Author Archives: Thea

Psychoanalysis and the Integral Yoga ... two letters

Introduction

This yoga can only be done in the end by those who are in total earnest about it and ready to abolish their little human ego and its demands in order to find themselves in the Divine.  It cannot be done in a spirit of levity or laxity; the work is too high and difficult, the adverse powers in the lower Nature too ready take advantage of the least sanction or the smallest opening the aspiration and tapasya needed too constant and intense.  It cannot be done if there is a petulant self-assertion of the ideas of the human mind or wilful indulgence of the demands and instincts and pretensions of the lowest part of the being, commonly justified under the name of human nature.  It cannot be done if you insist on identifying these lowest things of the Ignorance with the divine Truth or even the lesser truth permissible on the way.  It cannot be done if you cling to your past self and its old mental, vital and physical formations and habits; one has continually to leave behind his past selves and to see, act and live from an always higher and higher conscious level.  It cannot be done if you insist on “freedom” for your human mind and vital ego.  All the parts of the human being are entitled to express and satisfy themselves in their own way at their own risk and peril, if he so chooses, as long as he leads an ordinary life.  But to enter into a path of yoga whose whole object is to substitute for these human things the law and power of a greater Truth and the whole heart of whose method is surrender to the Divine Shakti, and yet to go on claiming this so-called freedom . . . is to indulge in a blind contradiction and to claim the right to lead a double life’.


Sri Aurobindo
Letters on Yoga, p.1310

13-14 March, 1987

 

Today I received your letter which I found very interesting on many levels, for many different reasons. My impressions may run toward slightly different conclusions than yours; or rather, I think there is one fundamental point, or a sort of line of demarcation: What you have been experiencing, the way it came, the orientation it took can be understood, explained by modern Western psychology. And if you cling to that you are likely never to make it to a spiritual breakthrough.

This is the problem I face with everyone who comes to this work from the springboard of Western psychology, psychotherapy, psychoanalysis. I say ‘problem’ because it causes a limitation in the consciousness if one wishes to ‘extend one’s boundaries’. This extension has to have the right poise. To be specific, if you seek to expand your consciousness, in the specific context of this work – and therefore I prefer to use the phrase ‘extend one’s boundaries’ – then you can’t do so with the ego placed centrally and reinforced. All modern psychology today does this. Finally it is disastrous in questions of spiritual advancement because the ego cannot sustain, support, give rise to the expansion. For people who ‘find themselves’ in or through psychotherapy, for example, it is dangerous to disturb that new-found balance, because a total breakdown can be the result. And so, the problem is complex, tricky, when they wish to take up a spiritual path, of the traditional order – not to speak of this one. It is necessary to go very gradually then and to break down this new ego-centred structure that has so laboriously been established. It is usually impossible and so I leave it at that.

But your case is interesting because it puts before us one of the major problems of spirituality vis-à-vis this new integral yoga. It also brings up certain issues related to the supramental yoga; but for the time being I shall concentrate on the former.

In traditional spirituality these problems do not arise, really speaking, because there is no question of transformation of the nature. There is no attempt to integrate the various parts of the being; there is no concern with the personality, or even the individuality, for that matter. In most paths it is the Self alone that matters – above, detached, disengaged from all that incarnation in a physical body on Earth implies, i.e., the necessity of the ego in the earlier stages of evolution of the species, the development of the personality, and so forth. And so, not having to deal with these aspects of the embodied consciousness and being – except inasmuch as is necessary in order to attain release therefore – that pernicious void at the centre of the human consciousness became consolidated. Psychology developed in the West as a desperate response to this hopeless state of affairs. A method had to be found to accommodate the human being, to adjust him/her to the travails of ‘life in the world’, and a highly competitive world at that. This was accomplished by sacrificing the spiritual poise in favour of the ego-centred poise of Western psychology. There was simply no other way. The West was not about to accept the Eastern attitude of detachment and resignation. The West had to secure its poise in Matter, not mimic the Oriental’s disengagement and obliteration in the Void – which in any case it could not do. Psychology was the tool.

But, as we know, neither way is the answer. Something of a blending of the two eventually comes about… But the East furnishes an essential point nonetheless. This is the disregard for the ego as the centre of one’s life. It prefers the Spirit, the Self.

Your latest letter is about the clearest display of the above dichotomy that I have ever come across. You can easily stay with your discovery; and that would be fine. But you will not be able to do so in the parameters of this work because it will be even more unbearable for you than ‘those years of darkness’ before this newly-found light! And why is this? Simply because your poise in the experience is dangerously off, and you are projecting outside, in an even more grandiose manner than you have ever done before.

But you yourself have given the clue to the off-poise. Or rather, the question you pose on page 2 of your letter is the lever to catch hold of if you want access to the right chamber. You write, ‘I wondered why my soul had chosen this set of circumstances to incarnate’ – meaning the difficult circumstance of having a mother who…etc, etc, etc. And then, regarding that mother, there is another telling reference in your letter, where, in the previous paragraph you write of the feelings of ‘pity’ for her that this new understanding has engendered – rather than disgust or anger, I suppose.

But you have missed the point. And it made me realise the difference (so subtle) between ‘pity’ and ‘compassion’. If your poise was truly of the integral yoga in this experience, then it is more likely that you would have used the word compassion rather than pity. Pity strikes me in this context as being extremely revealing in that it indicates that you are externally poised. You see yourself as the victim of a set of circumstances, not central and generative. This, then, would answer your question, ‘Why have I chosen these circumstances?’ And this is the major difference between East and West. This is the key feature in the doctrine of Karma – but, of course, it has been so pathetically watered down.

In other words, if you go a step further, if you plunge into the spiritual dimension while yet engaged in an integral, integrating process, you will see that you yourself have obliged your mother to do those vicious things she has done to you, that all along it has been your insufficiencies, your unwillingness to use the circumstances your soul chose for progress that compounded her condition. And then arises compassion – not pity. No superiority.

But to see this one must expand the vision to see the eternal trajectory of the soul, the unbroken journey to the light, and understand the real mechanism to reach that luminous summit.

What you have attained now is a very limited, albeit important and decisive view of things. And yes, I had given you a formidable ‘hint’ regarding that ‘dark knot’ in the lower vital. But the danger is that unless you act fast and get your true bearings or grounding in the spirit, you will simply end by reinforcing that knot beyond repair.

I have given you far more than hints along the way. But ever I have been avoiding this very situation that has arisen now. You may remember (and perhaps you are holding this against me…I can sense this in your letter) that I have always discouraged you to zero in on your parents and to seek to ‘find the answer’ to your woes in or through them. The reason is simply what I am describing here. Yes that early conditioning played havoc and consolidated your present personality. But, that early condition was of your own choice and making. In other words, we make our bed and we sleep in it, but this takes place in the higher reaches of consciousness and uses our infant and childhood instrument in ways we do not so easily appreciate.

This is the wisdom and maturity of the East.

Now, the point is that you have to take this experience and put it into its proper perspective. What you are doing right now is simply shifting the spotlight from me to your poor mother! Admittedly I’m happy to be relieved from my punching-bag role – but, I don’t approve, for your own sake. But what is important in this is that you were able to see the mechanism of your own psychology though you had to project it onto your mother and see her as the cause of the problems. It may appear so if you view life as starting from this birth, this isolated point in time, with nothing before it.

And yet, what I am describing is something far more complex and profound than the so-called Karmic Justice. I am saying that each individual is a responsible centre at each moment of existence. That responsibility is your really divine gift and attribute. The lamentable thing is that nowadays it is so fashionable to refuse responsibility for our actions, and to reject any feelings of ‘guilt’. Therefore psychologists are trained to be the perfect neutral ‘mirrors’ – no judgement, etc.

I am quite familiar with the narcissistic theory, having just finished Scott Peck’s book People of the Lie. But nothing of it ‘sticks’ much because it is, again, external to where it is really at. Nonetheless, these are stages, and sometimes aids. But, you see, all of this you have been given the opportunity to work out in the context of the integral yoga, where the Divine is the Mirror and all relationships have to be worked out according to our response and resistances to the Divine. Do you get the difference?

For example – the question of jealousy. You are again escaping the pressure by writing that you never really identified with that feeling, rather you identified with its companion, in your case: revenge. Quite true. But remember that in one of my recent letters to you I described the different types: one person is jealous and it turns back on herself – akin to auto-destruction. Another has to act on this jealousy and destroy.  That is what you now describe as ‘seeking revenge’ (for all the love you didn’t get from your mother…etc, etc, etc.

What I am seeking to point out to you is a very, very important thing. I would say it is crucial to your ability to enter fully the path of yoga – this yoga. It is, moreover, the really distinguishing point of this yoga in itself. That is, it is a question of remaining at the level of the person, or attaining the Person. You wrote recently of understanding how everything I say or write to you, you have been ‘taking personally’, as a personal offence or attack, and how this impeded you from making the best out of the help I was giving. This is more true than what you think. I promptly wrote to you to cling to that new insight. It would help you in what has to come.

In fact, now you stand at the crossroads: you are in danger of limiting your progress and becoming caged for good in the boundary of the person, the ego, the personality.

The release you felt, the happiness at your discoveries is the usual reaction in psychoanalysis: because you shift the responsibility. Then Patrizia comes along and saddles you with the whole damn burden again! – No, not the burden but the responsibility and the seed of causation. Without that, you can only stay put.


***


There is simply too much to comment on regarding your experience. I don’t know if I’ll have the time to cover it all. Last night I recorded a discussion on this, but it may prove too shocking for you all. I’m getting progressively more radical with each passing day!

Sexuality. The ‘lost paradise’ that you seem to be pining for is the surest ticket to hell. Go cautiously in this area and look at it like this: All the women around you are prisoners of their sexuality. They cannot do without a man. The sexuality you feel your mother deprived you of and that is the healthy right of the human being has only served to keep women pinned to their sex centre. For the spiritual path it is, undoubtedly, one of the main situations that keeps most people out of spirituality and away from a union with the divine. It separates the men from the boys as it were.

You are in the fortunate position of being free from this problem – and yet now you are encouraging yourself to believe that this freedom is a sickness. It reminds me of a person I knew in the Ashram who wrote to the Mother that he craved companionship, a family, etc, and so he wanted to get married. Her reply was: You sound like a free man who wants to become a slave!

You’ve got your position all wrong, as do the psychologists. Your problem does not lie in the lack of a fulfilling sex life. It is rather that your sex too is being affected by that ‘knot’ – not vice-versa. There are many people who do not indulge and have no knots – who have never indulged. X, for one. Now, the psychologist will consider that there is something radically wrong, abnormal in X. And he will search high and low in X’s make-up to try and find the disturbance that he can attribute to ‘sexual starvation’. This is why I say that Western psychology can never make you free – it can only imprison you, and make you adjust nicely to that prison if you follow its methods in full.

Why don’t you look at it differently: your soul chose to give you the mother you have precisely so that she would inhibit your sexuality – and thus leave you in a far better position for the spiritual life than 99% of humanity. Your responsibility resided in working out and through the kinks. Instead of using your mother’s influence to form a negative condition, the impulse of your soul has always been to make use of that apparently negative conditioning for its own purposes: to realise the Divine. But you have been fleeing from the soul’s light all along – primarily by always blaming others for your problems, and, above all, (I’m sure you will remember my constant harangues on this) by not having gratitude in your heart for the conditions the Divine has put you in, from the beginning, to further the growth of your soul’s light.

You are doing this constantly – and now you have the sanction of psychology for this infantile whining and bemoaning your sorry state. Whereas I see your mother’s influence as having been a ‘blessing in disguise’. It was up to you then to allow that to operate in the way your soul intended. The problems are yours, not your mother’s. But, again, it depends what your priorities are…

And there is this: I sense that you feel I will accept you and your difficulties more readily – give you that ‘love’ that I have been so perversely withholding – if you can show me that all of this rubbish is not you. It is really your mother’s rubbish that has been piled on you, the victim. The real you is worthy of my love after all. And in this way, once again, you believe you can extract what you want. Do you see the twist? Because right now you are flying high. You have found the method. You feel release. But tomorrow you are going to find yourself back in the dumps again, because none of this, in the way you are poised, is going to really bring the shift. And so, resentment will increase a hundredfold. Added to your original problems will be entirely new ones, which you are piling on yourself right now – I mean, problems in your relation with the Divine. You are adding self-indulgence and righteousness. It will very soon result in: How is it that she never realised it wasn’t me but it was my mother!? And then, more easily you can indulge in shifting of responsibility. Patrizia will be the punching bag again, which you will attack with re-doubled vigour! Because you will have in your support authorities of Psychology. This is a new escape, and hence a great ‘release’.

Count your blessings. See that the conditions of your life have always been the right ones, to lead you to the path. See this experience in its correct perspective. Gather from it what is valuable for your progress, what is helpful in freeing yourself of your inner demons. But do not use this experience also to tighten the Knot. Which is what you will end up doing because the poise is wrong, the vantage point is the ego, not the soul.

Please reflect on this deeply. You will not find one letter of Sri Aurobindo or the Mother to their disciples discussing any of the issues you raise and which you feel have brought you a new hope. They never got involved in this bag of modern psychology, its methods and conclusions. They dealt with what is – and strictly on one basis: the sadhak’s relation to the Divine. That is all, and that is everything. For all relations find their ultimate fulfilment in That.

Any kinks, twists, knots in the being came up in the sadhaks’ dealings with Them – and it is with Them, in and through this relationship that the disciple had to work through his/her problems. In this way, and only because of this, was the situation avoided of gathering any further knots, resultant from the method itself with respect to the spiritual attainment.

You were put in the most fortunate situation of a close contact for the above purpose. Your problem lies simply in one spot: you never accepted this guidance and sought rather to have me mould everything to your liking and satisfaction. What torturous conditions of the past which led you to this poise are not so important, since in any case you cannot really get to the root of those conditions in a true understanding. Your conclusions will always be coloured by your off-centre poise, by the ego, quoi. And so, all you had to do was to observe your relation with me and cultivate that basic attitude of the integral yoga: Surrender to the Divine. That is the master key. But you never used it. You ‘resigned’ yourself to my ‘commands’, feeling hurt, suppressed, abused, misused, unloved. But you never surrendered. And this is just what you did with your mother, and are indulging in in full force now: hurt, suppressed, abused, misused, unloved. And on and on goes the litany. Whereas all you had to do was to Surrender, to open to the Divine, on the Divine’s terms, whatever they may be, give of yourself unconditionally. And then you would have known love, the divine Love, which is in you. It does not come from outside, from anyone. By getting someone ‘to love’ you, including your mother, it does not mean that you would have found it easier to realise the divine Love. Rather the contrary. Those who have a fulfilling human love rarely turn to the Divine. Or if they do it is amidst great conflict and creates a chasm which they rarely successfully bridge.

Rather, cases of unfulfillment on the human level can be the greatest boon for the fulfillment of the Spirit. Provided the poise is right vis-à-vis the Divine. Provided one sincerely wants That, and only That. Then the ‘negative’ becomes miraculously positive. Then there is no resentment, no pity, anger, or whatever. There is only Love, compassion, understanding of the magnificent workings of destiny and the soul’s ways. Then there is acceptance – not resignation. Then Love is born and becomes a condition of being. It needs no object. It simply is. For it is the Divine in you.

The love which you have craved was not that. Indeed, it was not love at all. And therefore you never received it. But this lack also was made use of by the ego. It is always the ego that distorts, abuses and misuses what the soul sets up for our growth. Because we are a race in Ignorance, a half-species, moving toward a better tomorrow. You were insanely jealous and revengeful of Z for this ‘love’ you felt I unjustly gave to her, not you. But you fail to remember that all along I sought to shift Z’s focus to the Divine (and this was where your intervention was so destructive). And why? Because I knew that only if she cultivated that Divine Love could she find the strength to overcome the onslaught. Her failure (her responsibility) was that. But she too clung to her will and used that to impede the true Surrender – feeling hurt, abused and misused, and all the rest. In other words, I sought to have her make a contact with the Sun of this work – but the conspiracy was too formidable. The ‘centre could not hold’.

(In Z’s case: If she sees those hostile actions and what motivated them in her regard, it is useful only insofar as by this she is able to see where and when she failed to use that set of negative circumstances to make the breakthrough that was demanded of her. If she passes the rest of her life bemoaning her sad fate that brought so-and-so into her life, of whose nefarious activities she was the prime victim, then she has missed the point and misused the opportunity.)

And all of you ladies over there have it in for your mothers. All over the world, it is those damned mothers who smother! No one mentions their fathers except, as in your case, to put them up as victims (of the temptress Eve). Interesting, quoi? How shallow is this seeing, really how small. In a word, everything you have written me about your mother is simply your condition. Forget her. Deal with the condition which you both fortify in each other, in the whole human race. That collective karmic web…. For what you are doing in this latest experience is to reinforce that web, once more by fleeing from an acceptance of your own responsibility in fortifying that web, once more to blame others, life, the circumstances of childhood and whatnot, for your condition. And hence to escape, once more, in dealing with what is. It is always others who are to blame, and by consequence must change. Not you. Your part is only to see this blame, the vile manner in which they have encrusted you with a ‘false self’…and on and on it goes, the escape, the refusal to change by starting from the only place where change is possible: yourself.

And this is the failure of Western psychology, why it is so limited in its scope and capacity to bring well-being. It is a mental theory of escape. But what it can do, and often does, is to adjust the human creature to the limitations of the instrument and the society in which it functions, by a series of elaborate mental theories which provide continuous experiences of release by this process of shifting responsibility and moving out of the present, away from what is. For those who must function in the old world this may suffice. But not for the new beings. Consequently those new beings also need better instruments, and that is our aim as well.

But by this I am not saying that Western psychology is all wrong. Indeed, many of its observations are accurate. Its method in many ways is helpful. But it is limited by its goal and scope, that is all. Your task is to determine what is right for you, as determined by your soul. Hence see what is. (Concluded)

18 March, 1987

I feel that the answer I sent to Y’s latest, concerning her psychological experiences regarding her childhood conditioning, says pretty much all that I would like to say on this matter. Yet, of course there is always more. New things come up. New insights. At this point I can see very clearly, more clearly than ever before, the distinction between the approach of psychoanalysis and that of the Integral Yoga. I cannot see how the two can be reconciled – in the experience. Because the poise in psychoanalysis precludes the other. This is a fact; and never before has it been so clear to me as now, seeing the course Y is on, the direction her inner work is now taking.


What is very interesting is to observe (and I can do this from my own personal experience) how the two approaches are so similar. The method in certain areas is almost identical. True, as you write, a mental understanding is in no way sufficient. The emotions must be involved and the method must somehow engage the vital. But that is the dangerous part. The vital is power. It is the fortress of the will. If the poise is not the right one for the Integral Yoga, this engaging of the vital will result in a crystallisation of the ego-centre, the axis in the lower hemisphere. This is what Y is doing now. There was one thing certain in all of this: When she left she was poised rightly for the Integral Yoga. That is, her base was the right one from which to start the real process of yoga. It took many years to achieve just that much. But it was a lot. People spend lifetimes and they never come near to a poise of that nature.

But that was only the beginning. Now it is that very poise that is under severe attack and which she seems to be losing.

I think I ought to explain another difference – because you write often, as in this last letter, of wanting something other than a life in orbit of the ego; but I really wonder at times what that other ‘thing’ is for you. You see, we have our own ideas of a ‘life divine’, and more often than not this crystallises in a form of worship, rather than a real transformation of the being and a poise in which the Divine stands at the centre of our integrated being. I feel that for you psychology, psychotherapy are the answers to the knots in human nature. And once those knots are unravelled, then one can approach the Spiritual. Matters of the Spirit stand separate and apart for you. This is my impression, and I feel that this has come to a certain definition in your life in order to facilitate your day-to-day experience. It is an accommodation, an adjustment. And in terms of the old spirituality and the religion you have known, this may be true. The whole thing gets turned up-side-down when this new process (and power) is introduced.

I wrote that I had my own personal experience to go by in assessing the subtle difference between the two approaches. On the surface it would seem that what I experienced regarding my family conditioning, etc. (which I have recorded in The Tenth Day of Victory) is the same process you describe of re-experiencing and ‘mourning’. But there was a crucial difference. It was the poise in which this process was being experienced. I was at that time centred in the Divine – the Divine part of myself. The soul was the pivot around which all this was being played out. Indeed, it was precisely this that broke down the vital-ego will – once and for all.

This is exactly what is lacking in the Process Y is living now. And that is why it is so dangerous for her – in more ways than one. But I can hear you exclaiming that my case is different. I am perhaps in your mind a special case that cannot be compared to others, or that cannot be held as a model for others to follow.

This is wrong. I am here not to work out my personal karma and destiny but to open a path for others. A path that is one anyone can follow who wishes to attain the particular goal of the Supramental Yoga. The conditions I am put in and the instrument I am given to work with are thus the precise ones that will allow this experience in me, through me, which will serve to open this new path for others. And it has been precisely in this lived experience that I have been given the opportunity to see where it is that the human instrument, as we know it now, has failed; and the method by which we can evolve a better instrument capable of sustaining a new psychological synthesis.

You have read the 3rd Volume [of The New Way]. The process I described was this: the way to a new axis, a true centering in the Divine, in life, in the body.

I see that you have a special role to play in this. To me it has already been evident, even before we met, in that it was obliging me to focus all of this, to make it more exact. Or rather, to apply the knowledge gained in my own experience to the larger body. But I feel that in order to get the most out of your involvement, you are going to have to extend your boundaries. In the first place, you are going to have to make every conceivable effort to rise above the personal, to not permit yourself ‘to take things personally’, and to see your instrumentation, your involvement as a ‘service to the whole’. You had understood this while here in India. I am just reminding you, because we are ‘zeroing in’ and coming pretty close to HOME!

Y’s transparency once again in this matter has allowed me to assess an important aspect of the work I have to do. But something must be clarified at the outset: this is yoga; it is not psychotherapy. The needs that drive a person to seek relief through psychoanalysis are an indication that that person is not ready for the path of yoga – of practically any kind, but more especially the Integral Yoga. Here it is the Divine who is central – centred within, not beyond. There is no separation. But that centrality of the inner Divine cannot be experienced when the ego is the pivot. The only thing that can be attained of an awareness of the Divine when the ego is the pivot is a sense of a Divine Presence and Being through devotion, prayer, worship. But this implies separation and it is not the goal of this yoga. The Mother has said it well, ‘Those who worship do not want to change’.

This is the case with most Indian Yogas (the direct experience by identification), but the Integral and Supramental Yogas introduce a change, radical and total with respect to other paths. It is simply that we are working out a method whereby this central Divine can become our inner Sun in life, keeping in orbit of Itself all parts of the being; and ultimately, in the Supramental Yoga, of permitting the individual by this realisation to bring about a transformation in the world by a similar process of integration. That is when the new city-consciousness is established.

This work is not for people hence who need to strengthen their ego and who seek to ‘make whole’ something that in its very nature is separative and divisive. Its very purpose in being is to keep one in a consciousness of separateness. This may have been a legitimate function in a race of Ignorance, nailed to the cross of a severely limited physical instrument. But we are precisely concerned with introducing something else now, – a new instrument with infinitely greater possibilities. For that one has to be ready to extend one’s boundaries. This cannot be done with the ego upholding the process and the play of consciousness. If that had been possible we would not be the inferior species that we are and there would be no need of a Solar Line to forge this new way. But the evolutionary mechanism has its own laws, and wisdom. Above all it is an integral process characterised by a spherical wholeness. And so, we have to proceed on the basis of a progressive integration and reach an ultimate synthesis.

The time has now come to change the instrument and to raise the pivot and introduce a new axis. Those who do not see this and understand what it means and the sacrifices entailed, are simply not ready for this work. They can engage in a mental preparation which can be of benefit, but my experience has been that this involvement invariably creates a conflict in their lives. It is one thing to be on the outer periphery of this work, not in personal contact with the Centre or directly involved with the work, but nonetheless doing the yoga of a sort and striving in one’s own environment to refocus the being and to allow the new influence to organise our lives and gradually change the circumstances in which we live.

Another case is the person who holds simply to a mental involvement and persists in engaging in all sorts of activities which continue to reinforce the ego. In other words, who pretends to have his/her cake and eat it too. Ultimately this will create an even greater conflict in life and one or the other has to go.

But I repeat, the aim of this work is to introduce a new system which does not demand an ascetic ‘cutting away’ of all activities and aspects of life which appear to be in conflict with a realisation of the Divine. However, to achieve this the first prerequisite is a certain Surrender and an offering of oneself which permits the Divine to work in and through the instrument, in which IT decides what our needs are, what indeed must be integrated, and what must go. The decision is not ours, and is not mental, – that is, a rigid set of rules applicable to all. It is an individual process which, because of this, demands as deep-rooted a sincerity as is possible to attain. Insofar as this sincerity is precisely what the human being lacks, given the inferior poise of the instrument, then it becomes wise and necessary to have an outer guide who can check this sincerity and keep us on the right course in spite of our insufficiencies. This guide is not a therapist. The relationship between pupil and guide is entirely different, though at times it might appear that they are the same. And this difference is fundamental, for without it the Yoga cannot be done.

The process of therapy hinges on a certain interaction between therapist and client that is counterproductive for the purposes of this Integral Yoga. Herein the Divine is the guide. The teacher becomes, is, that for the disciple. In other words, while in therapy the therapist substitutes for the father, mother, lover, or whosoever and whatsoever, in Yoga the Guide substitutes for the Divine. That is, while the pupil has not made contact with his/her inner Godhead, the Teacher becomes that and plays the same role, though external. Yet, it is not external, insofar as the Teacher has realised that Godhead in him/herself, the process takes place in an integrated field of oneness and therefore the Guide becomes/is that inner Divine of the pupil.

This sort of relationship based on Oneness is impossible between therapist and client. Thus the distinction is crucial; and if a person schooled in therapy seeks to recreate with the Guide of Yoga that same relationship as between therapist and client, the goal of the Yoga can never be attained.

The therapist becomes or substitutes for the client all the relationships that make up the world as we know it. They are fragments and the therapist seeks to reconstruct and regroup these fragments in a particular process which will give a semblance of wholeness to a splintered ego. But the focus is always the ego, and hence the result is always an accommodation and an adjustment to that which is in essence unwhole, separative and divisive.  This is why therapy breaks down when it comes to the threshold of spirituality. It cannot cross that threshold because its method is the limitation. When a person has undergone therapy and has reconstructed his/her consciousness according to this limitation, the likelihood is that it will not be possible to introduce a new power and its processes. The element that stands in the way is precisely the ego, fortified by the mental and vital will. Because the only really unifying factor was absent from the process – the soul – then the reconstruction and regrouping of the mind and emotions is simply a fortification in a field not of oneness but of separateness. And all converges on the person, the me. It is for this reason that one of the outstanding characteristics of people who undergo psychotherapy is self-indulgence, at the centre of which stands self-will.

When a therapist has seen this limitation and wishes to overcome it, – as Scott Peck – then he shoots into religion. The development in Peck is classic and predictable; the conflict introduced is wholly understandable. It is then that a moralistic element begins to infiltrate and, I might add, contaminate the underlying premise of psychoanalysis. In Peck’s case, the development has carried him now to the logical conclusion: evil must be seen, labeled, defined. This seeking to carry psychoanalysis into a wider sphere has an undermining effect. If one is sincere, at a certain point one has to face the limitations squarely and honestly.


***


You give several reasons why you feel you should not be Y’s therapist. These reasons are very different from those that I have. You have had an important role to play in this matter, but you must draw the line at a certain point. In this type of work it is not at all healthy for fellow sadhaks to be involved with each other in the way you are now involved with Y. The forces you are dealing with are of a different order than in normal circumstances and you are reaching into a person’s destiny and karma and stirring things of that deep nature. It means that you have to be able to bear that responsibility. The process is different than common therapy. These forces are on the order of what Peck describes in his book People of the Lie, and which he terms ‘evil’ – we say ‘hostile’. His immediate reaction was to recoil and not have anything to do with them. He admits that he is not capable of transforming these ‘evil’ characteristics.


***


What I have to add, or rather emphasize, is that this work is for people who really want something else and have the capacity to undergo the process. If that inner strength is absent then there will be ‘breakdowns’, as you describe. Sometimes the breakdown is temporary. Sometimes it is complete and decisive, and the person realizes he/she is a ‘fish out of water’, so to speak.

I have written you in the beginning of this letter that only if you succeed in extending your boundaries beyond the personal and can appreciate your ‘service to the higher cause’ will it be possible not only for you to understand what you and the others have lived through, but to be able to continue in this work. The hard part is to see how we are being used. The ego gets hurt, takes offence, recoils. The soul knows that this is the way the Divine is getting the work done and established in the world. It is then that the right poise comes and the disciple realises along with Sri Aurobindo that he/she is doing the yoga ‘for the Divine’ rather than for the world, for humanity. The distinction is subtle but essential.

People are very quick to talk about ‘a new consciousness’, rescuing the Earth, saving humankind, stopping the forthcoming nuclear holocaust. But when they are brought to participate in the only process that can really change things, they flee: ‘That’s not the way it’s supposed to be! I won’t give up my ego which I have worked so hard to preserve!” Then they run to the nonsense of ‘extraterrestrials’ – no demand for change, for hard work. Just a prolongation, a status quo.

I am not interested in any of that. The old ways hold no enticement for me and I have no illusions about their limitations.

 Patrizia Norelli-Bachelet

The Emerging Cosmos

The malaise of our civilisation is not an inchoate or unpredictable development. Rather, it is the logical, foreseeable result of thousands of years of partial and ineffective spiritual visions and incomplete philosophical systems. These have always been the driving force behind the evolution of higher mental forms. Therefore, if our civilisation stands at a critical juncture at present, it is not in the secular and scientific domain that we must search for the cause of the decay. We must discover what has been lacking in the dimension of existence that moulds the more external and material patterns which condition life on this planet.

Once the root of the problem is located in its true area of causation, necessarily a change must be introduced in that sphere before the more external levels can be influenced. Thus if we can locate the root cause of the decay in that more essential domain, our task of bringing about a change in the individual and in society and of establishing a new world order on Earth is greatly facilitated.

Indeed, the crux of the problem lies here: for thousands of years sages, saints, yogis, philosophers, and men and women of wisdom have described  the purpose of birth on this planet as simply a passage to a reality beyond  not only our planetary home but entirely out of the cosmic dimension. The course our civilisation has taken can therefore be directly connected to this factor. The influence a vision of this nature has wielded has been devastating – for it has carried the planet and its multiple societies to the brink of total annihilation.

We may call this development a conspiracy of the spiritual elite which gradually influenced the whole tenure of life on Earth, spreading its tentacles of influence through religions and philosophical systems during the past several thousands of years, but now through scientific, political and socio-economic systems. The latter can invariably trace their inspiration to some spiritual or philosophical source. For even our most material ideologies that apparently deny the higher realities of existence and focus entirely on the physical dimension, have done so by virtue of a reaction to those more metaphysical postulations.

Many profound thinkers throughout the world have perceived that it is only a spiritual renaissance that can save our civilisation. Only if we attain a different consciousness, rooted in some higher seeing, can there be any real change, they feel. This may well be true, but what is not appreciated is that the present chaos is a direct outcome of our past mystic and spiritual perceptions. There are two aspects to this development. One is the course spirituality took in the West, which founded itself on a certain form of negation of life; and the other is the Eastern orientation, in its own way equally a denial of life.

In the West, out of denial and suffering there developed a certain strength. Believers had been encouraged to accept suffering as a way to God and the means to attain a heaven beyond this life.  Indeed, life on Earth came to be considered a prison and the fall of the soul. Salvation, through negation of life, could only come in a beyond, namely in some transcendent Heaven. The final outcome of this negation has been the materialistic philosophies and political ideologies which the West has given to the world. Presently there is a clear dichotomy on the planet, whereby  western civilisation has aligned itself clearly and decisively with what has come to be called in spiritual circles the ‘materialistic consciousness’.

However, in the East we find a similar denial of life, also as an outcome of its spirituality.  Interestingly, this negation took hold of the consciousness of eastern wisemen at about the same time that a similar denial caught hold of their western counterparts. About the end of the first millennium Indian spirituality veered fully toward a quest for otherworldliness: the philosophies of the day made the conclusive proclamation that all creation in matter was an ‘illusion’, a deceptive veil that seekers of Truth must tear through in order to reach the immutable, immobile, transcosmic and static Brahman; or a Self devoid of all relations in this material web of time and space.

Thus at approximately the same period in history, the stamp of otherworldliness and denial of life and the planet’s own truth of being and purpose as a home of an evolving species, became firm pillars of our civilisation. This conditioned everything. This denial coloured all our perceptions and gradually moulded every pattern we evolved for the regulation of our individual and collective life. And what we are faced with today is simply the ultimate display of that denial and negation of life. The human being has carried the formula of this negation to its fullest extremes:  What was seen as the highest spiritual poise has been carried over to the material realm, or the stage upon which all the ideals and more ethereal concepts of humankind are played out; with the predictable result that now science has furnished the race with the ultimate powers for its own destruction. If the only purpose of life on this planet is to escape it somehow, never more to return, then we are wholly justified in seeking means to destroy this springboard base as the ultimate and conclusive ‘solution’.

It is important to see clearly that the root of this problem is directly connected to the religious dogmas and spiritual visions that have conditioned our living since time immemorial. Spirituality is not a static expression. It has evolved pari passu with the material evolution. In fact, there is only ONE evolution, one principle evolving through the myriad forms that constitute our world. This ‘consciousness’ has two facets, – material and spiritual. But both respond to the same underlying energy and drive.

Consequently, to posit the ultimate solution in either the spirituality we know today or in materialism, with its own brand of denial of life, is inadequate. Indeed, such attempts have consistently failed.  Spirituality can only offer old solutions which were themselves largely the causes of the decay. Likewise, materialistic answers are prisoners of the same insufficiencies; and continuing as we are, they will drive us to a total destruction in order to play out the drama of denial of life that spirituality has constantly espoused in one form or another, under one disguise or another.

To accurately assess the situation it is required that we examine the problem deeply, in an effort to reach the core of the matter and discover the fount from which both science and spirituality receive their driving force. Therefore, it is necessary to perceive what stands behind the play of forces; and to do so we must come to a more enlightened understanding of the evolutionary process itself. This will provide us with a more holistic assessment of the condition of the highest instrument nature makes use of for the purpose of the evolution of the species, in order to effect this upward march to ever better forms of consciousness and life: the mental human being.

For this is the self-evident purpose of evolution. It is to bring forth evermore perfect forms in order to create more complex and sophisticated networks or patterns of structured energy that can express more harmonious states of consciousness-being. Our present stage is merely one step along the evolutionary way, albeit a decisive one. We have reached a major evolutionary turning point. There is a choice: Before us lies a totally new way of life and by consequence a new world order. For this, a finer, more refined instrument has to manifest. And this is the major focus of the present crisis. We are in the process of evolving a human instrument capable of sustaining the greater cosmic forces at play through life and matter on this planet, without experiencing destructive collapse of energies or succumbing to the old ways of escape through outdated solutions and methods the world has known until now.

The human instrument as it is presently constituted pivots a void.  At its centre lies a ‘black hole’ into which energies collapse, cave in, dissolve; resulting ultimately in decay and death.  And out of this condition of the instrument, through which the human consciousness perceives the reality beyond, came the projection of a world in chaos and collapse and hence the perception that salvation, of whatever order and under whatever guise, lay beyond this material universe and, above all, away from  this woeful planet Earth. The demon of the drama was seen to be the senses, which wisemen understood to be the limiting factor which distorts a reality that somehow could be disconnected from the body and experienced separately, free from our physical organs of perception and hence disengaged from the world of material creation, out of which and within which these senses have evolved. Thus, ways were devised to liberate the seeker from the physical, sensual instrument, limited by its own apparently untransformable insufficiencies.

To be more specific, such projections and perceptions of our condition are the logical outcomes of a species ill-poised, but for reasons quite different than those given in current religious, mystic and spiritual explanations. The human being has an off-centre pivot of his bodily instrument, which results in a distorted perception of our world; but which is, paradoxically, caused by the perception itself.  Consequently, to alter that perception it is required that concurrently we shift this axis of being – in the species – and allow evolution to carry us to a new and higher destiny.

The human instrument, an intrinsic part of the solar system and the universal harmony, is structured energy just as any other microcosmic or macrocosmic body. The human being has its ‘axis’ also, around which the individual frame is organised and because of which a separate entity can come into existence and sustain itself without dispersion, adding to this magnificent display of multiplicity within unity, which is the key feature of our material world. But because we are as yet merely a transitional species, albeit evolving to a higher form, the present ‘axis’ and its location within the  body, which has come into being in accordance with certain evolutionary laws, encourages atavism as the single most important driving force of the species.

Over the ages, wisemen, philosophers, seers, mystics, have sought through various means to alter this condition. In place of the inertia of atavism they have sought to install a higher purpose.  But the inadequate condition of the instrument through which perception is made, provided only a partial understanding of the problem; and hence the techniques which were devised in order to help the human being to find release from this limiting function were in themselves inconclusive and did nothing to alter in any way conditions on the planet.  Matters progressively worsened, until finally, seeing the gravity of the situation, all those who in some way have been concerned with this problem, came to a dramatic impasse.  Finding that it was apparently impossible to change this evolutionary determinism, all spiritual and religious paths proffered methods of escape from the ‘coils of this corruptible flesh’ as the only way to salvation, and to seek dissolution of the consciousness in a transcendent Beyond or a nirvanic Void.  Not only has this done nothing to change conditions on Earth, it has complicated the task of discovering the solution. And finally we find ourselves, as a species, facing possible annihilation.

Let us demonstrate the subtle ways in which this notion of irredeemability has penetrated the thinking of even those philosophers whom one would expect to perceive the position differently, primarily because they are indefatigably engaged in the task of instructing men and women the world over on the ways to a better life.  But a better life where? If  it  is  here, on  this  planet, then the flaws that emerge in these teachings must be  pointed out, which will serve to expose the fact that on the basis of  just  such erroneous visions the human condition is what it is and cannot hope to change. Rather, the condition becomes compounded.

To illustrate, we may quote a statement of one of the most eminent thinkers of our times, the late J. Krishnamurti:

‘Truth cannot be exact. What can be measured is not truth.’

(Krishnamurti’s Notebook, Harper & Row, 1976, p. 24.)

This declaration is sure to appeal to all those who have become disenchanted with life in the body and in the material  universe of which  measure is the salient feature, and who have subsequently posited the goal of their quests in some extra-cosmic heaven or transcendent Beyond. For, what is Krishnamurti really stating?

It is simply this: the higher reality is not of this world, measurable in time and space, and any such attempt to find truth within this material (measurable) universe is futile. Hence this statement is a denial of life and fosters a totally divisive consciousness (certainly not the aim of his teaching efforts on the surface), whereby truth is OUTSIDE of time and space and hence beyond our world. God, the supreme Reality, or Truth is not, according to Krishnamurti, found in what is measurable.

It is this sort of postulation that has carried us to the point of such a tremendous evolutionary crisis.  And lamentably, it is men and women concerned preeminently with the spiritual well-being of  humankind  who  have contributed most to this situation, either by encouraging the faithful  to live rightly and morally – but only for the purpose of reaching ‘heaven’ after death; or else by subtly and more often unknowingly, as in the case of Krishnamurti, consolidating the perception of an untransformable, irredeemable material creation, into which the soul and spirit of the human being has fallen and out of which some form of escape must be found in order to know truth in its transcendent, pristine and uncontaminated purity.

Krishnamurti provides us with another example of the way in which this vision has permeated the intelligentsia, in quarters that one could not have anticipated.  Of late two books have appeared with transcripts of his conversations with the physicist David Bohm. It is interesting to observe that Krishnamurti succeeds in carrying Bohm, a physicist and hence a person supremely trained in the art of Measure, into his vision of a featureless void, in which time is an illusion and there is no becoming.  A portion of their conversation will suffice to illustrate the nature of the problem:

JK: I am asking you as a physicist, is this universe based on time?

DB: I would say no, but you see, the general way…

JK: That is all I want. You say no! And can the brain, which has evolved in time…?

DB: Well, has it evolved in time? Rather, it has become entangled in time. Because the brain is part of the universe, which we say is not based on time.

JK: I agree.

DB: Thought has entangled the brain in time.

JK: All right. Can that entanglement be unraveled, freed, so that the universe is the mind? You follow? If the universe is not of time, can the mind, which has been entangled in time, unravel itself and so be the universe?

And further on, Krishnamurti makes this revealing statement:

‘…to be free of becoming? That is the root of it. To end becoming…Of course, there is only complete security in nothingness!’ (The Ending of Time, Harper & Row, 1985.)

This clearly, is the perception that must change if at all a new species and a new world order can safely take their place upon the planet for which they are destined. This calls for a complete readjustment in the ‘lens of our seeing’, precisely our ‘instrument of measure’, whereby the Earth comes into focus not as some eternal, irredeemable Hell that a chastising Creator has condemned us to, but rather the planet that serves a noble purpose in the cosmic order. This purpose is to evolve continuously higher and better forms of life. At present the human being is in transition toward a new condition. The breakdown we witness about us, inclusive of the marvels of technology that the human mind has brought into being, is an indication of that new order that is arising.  The axis of the human instrument is being encouraged to shift to a higher pivot, whereby the present atavism is no longer a rigid cross to which we are nailed as a race. Rather, the new species is liberated from this compelling drive and begins then a more conscious participation in this grand act of Becoming through which a new instrument is being wrought. But for this to occur, the orientation of our quest and its consequent goal, based on a truly new perception of the higher reality of existence, must shift. The direction must cease to be otherworldly, no matter how camouflaged this may be, as noted by the example furnished above. The answer lies here, on Earth, in the body – but transformed by the power of a new seeing.

How is this achieved?  The new axis is not metaphysical. It is a pivot that comes into being in accordance with precise evolutionary laws involving time.  By working with time in a particular manner, it is possible to restructure the consciousness, and ultimately the physical being, around a higher pivot.  This cannot be accomplished while religions and the old spirituality block the process by emphasis on a metaphysical experience that disengages the human being from any spiritually and materially meaningful contact with the physical world, and consequently absolves him from any responsibility therein. According to these now outdated ways, the purpose of life was to somehow find escape from it, to either expiate one’s sins and reach heaven, or to work out a karma and thereby become freed from taking birth again on this woeful planet. In the midst of such a conditioning, it was not possible  to alter the evolutionary pattern, insofar as the means to do so, in particular a conscious work with time, were denied their truth and the part they played to attain a higher reality.

The new world is a world in which both the being and the becoming are harmonised in the vision. Therefore Sri Aurobindo describes the choice of destiny that faces mankind at this crisis point as an accepting and embracing precisely of the becoming, as the means to attain the ultimate apotheosis, an evolutionary leap to a totally new status:

‘The significance of our existence here determines our destiny: that destiny is something that already exists in us as a necessity and a potentiality, the necessity of our being’s secret and emergent reality, a truth of its potentialities that is being worked out; both, though not yet realised, are even now implied in what has been already manifested. If there is a Being that is becoming, a Reality of existence that is unrolling itself in Time, what that being, that reality secretly is is what we have to become, and so to become is our life’s significance.’

(The Life Divine, Chapter 28.)

While the old degenerates into chaos and begins its collapse, there is simultaneously a work in progress to evolve a new species. The process entails, however, a laying of correct foundations.  That is, a new ‘blueprint’ is being evolved, the lines of which are drawn by time, the power of evolution for the gestation of any new form.

The new ‘blueprint’ being established at present is a pattern of harmony. Indeed, its inspirer is the closest, most complete pattern of harmony that we can observe and of which we are an intrinsic part.  It is the solar system – seen with a new eye and an entirely new and different instrument of perception and measurement. This blueprint of a new consciousness-being will provide the basis for a new world order. The outcome is a planetary society, inspired in its governance by the very harmonics of our System and in particular founded upon a vision that sees and accepts the Earth as the place where upon this progression is destined to occur.

But foremost in this evolutionary leap is the question of the purpose of evolution; and by consequence the purpose of our planetary home within the scheme of the cosmic order. It is clear that while we continue to turn to the old spirituality for solutions to our present state of collapse, we are only compounding that collapse, insofar as all spirituality considers life in this cosmos to be a fall and posits salvation in some form of a Beyond, unevolving and static. The dramatic shift that is required is then the complete refocusing of the lens we are provided with for evolution on Earth, and the resultant consciousness that introduces an entirely new direction in our perceiving. We cease to deny life and material creation as channels for expression of the highest truth principle. Rather, we see these as instruments on Earth of what Sri Aurobindo has called, the ‘life divine’.

There is a tested method to establish this new blueprint. It utilises time as the creative power for this revolutionary activity.  By a specific knowledge of the mechanics of our solar system and the relation of the planetary harmony to time, as experienced on Earth and in the human body, a shift is brought about in the consciousness-being of the individual practitioner, whereby a new pivot is established in the body, no longer prisoner of atavistic drives but responsive to a higher purpose.  On that basis a truly new harmony establishes itself within the individual and his society.  There is no longer a collapse of energies but rather a sort of mini-solar system manifests as a nuclear compound from where new influences emerge. Gradually these accumulate and extend and eventually draw into the orbit of the new System an increasingly wider sphere; until finally the entire planet becomes the home of this higher planetary society.

What evolves is therefore neither a new spirituality nor a new science or material ideology.  It is something beyond all these known methods but that miraculously harmonises and integrates all the expressions of mind, life, and matter in a splendid act of synthesis. The truth of our world is a magnificent manifoldness, expressing an exquisite diversity. But this multiple diversity is upheld and sustained by a power of integration and arises in a field of oneness, – just as our solar system is an expression of a superb manifold harmony within an integrating oneness.

This is an evolutionary process which respects the being as well as the becoming.  Hence it does not seek to obliterate the cosmic harmony which is rooted in time and is the instrument for the Becoming.  Rather, it evolves by the aid of those laws. Thus we can applaud Ilya Prigogine when he declares, ‘I want to feel the evolution of things. I don’t believe in transcending, but in being embedded in a reality that is temporal.’  (OMNI, May, 1983.)

The critical crossroad we have reached is mirrored in the expansion of this very solar system to the observing eye of humankind.  During the past several hundred years we have seen the System increase by three planets.  While over this same period, pari passu with this expansion, the consciousness of the species and the condition of our civilisation have also undergone singular alterations.  An acceleration in the evolution of consciousness never before witnessed has set in during this period, particularly heightened in our century. But what is required now, that ‘choice of destiny’, as Sri Aurobindo has called it, is a conscious collaboration with this process.  Prior to this critical juncture the human being was carried along on the crests of the evolutionary wave in an unconscious fashion.  But now, with the birth of a new consciousness and species, poised differently, centred on the higher axis of being, the possibility arises that we may collaborate consciously, guided by the harmonics of the very cosmos we inhabit and stand in awe of:  an applied cosmology, not another speculative theory.

In the midst of the chaos we see about us a sublime cosmos emerges. Its life does not depend upon the old in the midst of which it stands. It emerges as the old crumbles, uncontaminated by the morose suggestions of purposelessness that vitiate the atmosphere of this dying world. It emerges because the conditions for it are determined by higher evolutionary laws, and is hence a thing inevitable in the history of our planet’s time; even as the present mental being was an unavoidable and necessary circumstance, a step along the way but nothing more, and nobly played its role in the evolution of consciousness. The foundations of this new and higher species are solidly laid in the stratum that is indestructible. But not disengaged from material creation.  Rather, these new foundations are rooted in matter and they form the basis for a new species and society.


September, 1986
Aeon Centre of Cosmology
Kodaikanal, India
©1986 Patrizia Norelli-Bachelet

‘Sleeping Sickness’ and the Tapasya of Sri Aurobindo and the Mother

The following are transcripts of a dialogue between Patrizia Norelli-Bachelet and a disciple, on Oliver Sacks’ book, Awakenings (E. P. Dutton, New York, 1983), in which he reports on Encephalitis Lethargica (‘sleeping-sickness’), an illness that raged through Europe and America just after World War I; and what transpired when his patients were ‘awoken’ in 1969, nearly 50 years later.


25 November 1986


…What I wanted to discuss was this ‘sleeping-sickness’. Certain things have come together – incredible things – in my reading of The New Way, Volume 3; and they made me realise a lot of these connections even more closely.

   There’s a particular portion in Volume 3, ‘The Nature of the Core and the Question of Integrality’, that describes almost to a ‘t’ the nature of this illness, the way those people were experiencing it. You know, that portion where I write about these four Powers and the combined activities of 2 and 2: the 9 and the 4th (or the 1); and the 6 and the 3; and how these two bring Sri Aurobindo as the Transcendent and then the Mother’s action there in this contraction of consciousness. Then he comes to this ‘point’, this ‘seed’. And there’s this question of this speed that I mentioned, and that in this contracting process, it [the consciousness] attains so much speed that finally he bursts the limits of his physicality, as I wrote, and he comes back in the form of this Seed.

   Well, this is so descriptive of what these people were experiencing. I mean, there’s this question of speed. When they were given this drug in 1969, one of the things that clearly happened, that you can see when you read all their case histories, is that they were all ‘speeded up’. I think I’ve mentioned this to you, that almost hilarious description of that woman: when she’d start she couldn’t stop, and she’d take off to the next room, and rebound here and there like a billiard ball! But then there were other cases where really they were speeded up, their consciousness was clearly speeded up. But it was this complete…this distinction from this state of sleep and then the awakening which produced this speeded up consciousness; a lot of times even in thoughts and everything.

   But the really fascinating thing was, and I just realised it when I was reading The New Way, these passages about this awakening. This whole chapter, ‘The Nature of the Core and the Question of Integrality’, describes beautifully the action there that was going on. There is a portion about what happens to the Transcendent, and that this Transcendent actually falls asleep, when this contracting power of the Mother comes into play. I’ll read it to you. It was so phenomenal, the link with these people. And then I’ll go over the dates and you’ll see what…

‘Sri Aurobindo’s tapasya hinged entirely on rooting the Transcendent Principle or the Absolute in the Earth. As such the Third was his field, or the womb that would finally receive this seed. But the Mother was the indispensable bridge whereby the process of decreasing the Transcendent vastness could be accomplished. The secret of this process is contained in the Rig Veda wherein the nature of Aditi is described. She is the Mother of all powers, those divine as well as un-divine, – for Diti, the Mother of Darkness, is finally also a part of Aditi, the shadow of herself. The Mother in Sri Aurobindo’s tapasya was therefore this great cosmic womb through whom he decreased his vastness, or initiated the process of involution. In this second stage of his yoga he worked the transcendent vastness, or the Absolute, into the cosmic planes via the numerous dimensions or planes of consciousness that are contained in the cosmic womb, the Mother. This tapasya appears to produce a decrease or a diminishing which we can imagine as a whirlpool that carries a spiraling energy into its core; in that area all is then contained in a microscopic circuit: as the energy becomes more and more confined, its speed increases. There is thus a twofold action: the original substance or essence is diminished and this very act of tightening of an original substance into confined quarters creates a greater speed of the energy and thus binds it more solidly. It is thus that the seed is finally born.

The physics-minded seeker can readily understand that Sri Aurobindo’s tapasya was exactly the same as the creation of matter. The macrocosm is diminished in creation by the very same action and the original energy is crystallised in a constant process of tightening, whereby in the atom the action of confinement produces the tremendous speeds that serve to engender the energy that binds the nucleus. From this crystallisation process the solid forms of matter arise.

Fundamental in the process is the power of contraction. In Sri Aurobindo’s yoga this power was the Mother. She added the element that was altogether indispensable for his realisation. Without her he could never have accomplished the first and most essential stage of his tapasya; just as without the Third he could not have completed the final stage.

For Sri Aurobindo’s yoga therefore two feminine powers were indispensable. The first served as the field wherein he became involved or conscious in the countless cosmic dimensions born of the Transcendent, and by this means his vastness experienced the first effects of the power of contraction, bringing ever closer to the Earth dimension the essence of the Absolute. To fully appreciate the nature of his yoga one must envisage it as an awakening act: the Absolute, we may say, falls asleep in the passage of unmanifest to manifest. The deepest secret of this creation is thus the act of awakening of the Absolute. It is the reason why in many religious traditions this act is described as a Fall, a plunge into unconscious slumber. Indeed, at the heart of creation there is this slumbering Eye, and the purpose of evolution is the awakening of that Eye. Hindu tradition describes it as the sleep of Vishnu who is awakened by the power of Laksmi as he rests on the serpent Ananta (Eternity). Sri Aurobindo writes of it in his epic poem Savitri:


He is our seed and core, our head and base.
All light is but a flash from his closed eye
An all-wise Truth is mystic in his heart,
The omniscient Ray is shut behind his lids:
He is the Wisdom that comes not by thought,
His wordless silence brings the immortal word.
He sleeps in the atom and the burning star,
He sleeps in man and god and beast and stone:
Because he is there the Inconscient does its work,
Because he is there the world forgets to die,
He is the centre of the circle of God,
He is the circumference of Nature’s run.

Book XI, Canto I (CE, Volume 29, pp. 681-82)

And then I go on to say the Mother served as this divine Shakti in Sri Aurobindo’s yoga, making his act of awakening possible.

‘In her he realised his Self asleep in the vast cosmic manifestation, his very Self of which he had to become unconscious in order for involution to occur. She aroused him in the deepest recesses of her secret self. For the Absolute this is an experience of confinement, it must be understood. He awakens from his slumber, but finds himself contained in the cosmic womb of the Mother. Yet the greater dimensions of the experience prove this Body to be of the Absolute himself: there is no difference. In the passage of unmanifest to manifest, the Absolute transmutes himself – by his plunge, or his slumber – into his Body. Sri Aurobindo’s yoga or union with the Mother, then served to awaken him in this Body and initiate the process of contraction to a point, a seed. From the vast dimensions this original Essence is carried deeply into creation, in a process of tremendous and overpowering contraction. The deeper the Mother carried him into herself the greater was the speed he acquired. And this is the most profound secret of Sri Aurobindo’s tapasya: he acquired speed, his original essence-consciousness gathered such tremendous momentum that it allowed him to draw this energy into the minute confinements of the seed dimension of Form. With this accomplished, on the basis of the contracting power of the Shakti, he could leave and take birth as Agni, the Vedic principle of speed, of motion, of the upward drive – the God-leader of the journey who carries the movement to the realm of Truth.’

(The New Way, Volume 3, pp. 142-143)

Now this is so incredible because of the dates when all of this was going on. I was telling you that it was in 19…those years from 1917, 1919 to 1926/27. That was the end of it and then the thing disappeared completely. Now, those were the very years that Sri Aurobindo and the Mother finally came together for their joint tapasya. And I was reading in Volume 3, this interesting passage describing how…what the really important happening of the 24th of November, 1926, was, for the collective work. It was this factor, when they took up their joint tapasya together. Up until that time, prior to 1920 when the Mother was away, Sri Aurobindo was working on his own… That this was the really important thing because that was essential to working this out. So, during this period, these two Powers came together and this contracting process, putting him to sleep, more and more, as it’s described… And finally locked away in his room…and he came out totally asleep.

Well I mean, look at Satyavan. That’s all he does in the epic, he just goes to sleep…and that’s the end of it! He does nothing. I mean, you don’t even come to the awakening in [the epic].

And now this incredible story. But wait a minute, that’s not the half of it. Because, when did these people get this famous drug that awakened them? It’s clear that on the cosmic level these people succumbed to this sleeping-sickness, this encephalitis, because there was something tremendous happening. And this was a collective movement that responded.

But then there are the connections of the Mother with that influenza epidemic; because Sacks mentions in his book specifically that this sleeping-sickness came about after (I think on two occasions that something of this nature happened)…they directly relate it to that influenza. He believes maybe something weakened… So there, in Japan, I believe it was in 1918, – a few months in 1919 that that influenza happened… And that was when the Mother had that extraordinary experience of seeing the decapitated head, sort of the embodiment of that influenza that was the outcome, precisely, of the First World War. He was dressed as a soldier, I believe.


Yes, as an admiral, or something like that.


And then she stops the thing right there; almost dies, but stops it.


Yes, the ‘thing’ came to take her away.


And right after starts this sleeping-sickness all over the world: 3 million people afflicted. And then in 1920, she joins Sri Aurobindo and all during that period up to 1926-27, when he finally withdrew, this sleeping-sickness was raging all around. These people were put to sleep, and eventually then, just more and more and more became ‘contracted’.

Now, I mention about him falling asleep in the cosmic womb and being imprisoned in there. Well, you read Sacks’ book, you won’t believe it. The descriptions of these experiences! They were entombed, completely. I mean, it’s absolutely phenomenal. And then you have a reverse action. Now there’s a portion in this book where he describes, regarding a particular patient who was… He was baffled by all of this, of this contraction and expansion. And this question of speed of the consciousness that she [the patient] acquires afterwards.

‘Of the twenty patients whose stories I told in Awakenings, the one I did least justice to was Mariam H. Perhaps it has been only since 1972 that I have penetrated past a certain shyness and reserve, and come to realise the massive personality and intelligence within, how spacious she is as a person. Perhaps, previously, there was not only shyness but a contraction of self due to Parkinsonism and depression. If before she had to survive in the face of contraction…’

 (Before the drug awakened her)

‘…now she must hold together in the face of expansion – ’

(This is really too much, isn’t it?)

‘…the centrifugal power of Tourettish excitation – ’

(That’s a manifestation associated with Parkinsonism, tics and all kinds of things; obviously very speeded up and no control.)

‘…convulsive and compulsive motions and notions. If she were less massive, less spacious in her essential self, she would be carried away, or distracted, or fragmented, or contorted by the ‘false self’. The strange enkieness…which has developed on L-Dopa [the drug]. However, she shows not the least sign of being fundamentally discomposed by this – she is discomposed, briefly, in her tantrums and crises, but as soon as these are over, she regains her strong self: one must almost feel (to use one of her own favourite words) that her attacks are a ‘conduit’ to deal with excitement, to discharge it harmlessly, leaving her inner economy, her basic self, undisturbed. She readily accommodates Tourettish excitement, finding room for it in the outskirts of a commodious personality, and even gaining a certain advantage and pleasure from the extraordinary swiftness of thought and invention which goes with it. She lets it be, she allows it a place, but there is never any doubt as to who controls what: there may, indeed, be a ‘Tourettoma’, a false self, an ‘It’; but the real self, the ‘I’ is firmly in command, I find this incredible, when I think what she has been through.’

(Awakenings, p. 261)

Now, this is one case. Throughout the book he goes on describing this process where these people are contracted literally to a point.


With observation behind it…


But that’s the interesting thing, and that is what’s so pathetic about this, that somewhere that consciousness… Honestly, it’s just like being entombed and there is this tremendous wall between what they’re living inside and the capacity to express this outside. And I am convinced that this is due to the fact that their time-consciousness is completely off. I mean completely gone berserk. And what happens is that in this contraction process, that’s when they go into those lengthy, drawn out time sequences. It’s when they awaken that they go to the reverse, and they’re falling all over themselves. That’s one of the problems of this drug. They had to stop it…most of the patients then went into incredibly terrible experiences on the drug. First they were awakened and they had this remarkable opening; and then they started speeding up too much, and they’d fall and they’d break their hip and their arm and this and that. And then, of course, into hallucinations and all sorts of things.

There is that patient who accomplished this movement of just lifting his arm and cleaning his nose in eight hours! And only by filming it did they see that it was actually one motion and that he was totally convinced that it was done is a fraction of time!

So, there are these two processes, something absolutely extraordinary, where this contraction just drew them to a ‘point’ and enclosed them in this ‘womb’, this cosmic womb of their consciousness, of their illness. And then finally they lived the full process when they are awakened. Like the Transcendent that’s contracted and then awakens; and that is the main aspect of his [Sri Aurobindo’s] tapasya.

Okay, when did this awakening take place? I mean, this is the remarkable thing. Because of this drug…they first used it in 1969, in May, of 1969. Now, if you remember what I wrote in Volume 2 about the Periods of Enhancement, and how Sri Aurobindo’s began in May of 1969, because that was when in his time-cycle he passed over the Cardinal point before his 99th birthday in 1971. [See The New Way, Volume 2, pp. 302ff.] So the thing started when they administered the first drugs to these patients who began suddenly awakening. And then by 1971…that Period of Enhancement by his 99th year was complete. Of course that was the return to India in the form of that ‘seed’. And these people by that time, I think by 1972…because the experiences that he writes of in the book cover from 1969 precisely to 1972: Sri Aurobindo’s Centenary and the 100th year that marked the end of that cycle of Enhancement. Absolutely remarkable, this thing…

And then this quantity of 3 million people all over the world, just carried away…into this whirlpool of what was going on cosmically, when these two Powers came together. This isn’t going to be any consolation for them or their friends, but to me it’s just a remarkable play out and the way in which you see how the collective, at the collective level this sort of thing is possible when these formations come. Really, you can’t understand them otherwise. If you read his Preface you’ll see that he was just baffled by this, by whatever happened:

‘The theme of this book is the lives and reactions of certain patients in a unique situation – and the implications which these hold out for medicine and science. These patients are among the few survivors of the great sleeping-sickness epidemic (encephalitis lethargica) of fifty years ago, and their reactions are those brought about by a remarkable new ‘awakening’ drug… (L-DOPA). The lives and responses of these patients, which have no real precedent in the entire history of medicine, are presented in the form of extended case-histories or biographies; these form the major part of the book. Preceding these case-histories are introductory remarks on the nature of their illness, the sort of lives they have led since first being taken ill, and something about the drug which has transformed their lives. Such a subject might seem to be of very special or limited interest, but this, I believe, is by no means the case. In the latter part of the book, I have tried to indicate some of the far-reaching implications which arise from this subject – implications which extend to the most general questions of health, disease, suffering, care, and the human condition in general.’ (Ibid, p.1)

Believe me, he’s more right than what he thinks! I mean, phenomenal, this…really, just phenomenal. But at the same time, you see, I wouldn’t have been able to ever see this connection if I hadn’t perceived this in my own yoga, regarding these four Powers and this contraction. You know, I’ve been lingering with this book now for a couple of weeks, a few weeks, and just sort of barely inching my way toward the end. And now it’s just when I read that chapter [in The New Way, Volume 3] again about this Transcendent falling asleep and then awakening that I’m seeing that the times are exact. That makes me realise why I had to read Sacks’ book right now and discuss it. It’s become a sort of classic in this type of literature.

Some of this is so remarkable. I was telling you about the connection with the sign Cancer because that’s the first degree in the Precession of the Equinox in this Age of Aquarius. So all of this time from 19… So all of this is taking place in the first 72 years of the Age, which is ruled by the individual degree of Cancer. And this whole question of going into this ‘tomb’, this ‘sleep’ and all, is obviously so characteristic [of Cancer].

Now listen, here’s one…describing what this woman called Rose experienced just before she ‘fell asleep’, which probably came to light when she had awakened, I suppose:

‘The night of the sleeping-sickness, and the days which followed it, can be reconstructed in great detail from Miss R.’s relatives, and Miss R. herself. The acute phase announced itself (as sometimes happened…) by nightmares of a grotesque and terrifying and premonitory nature. Miss R. had a series of dreams about one central theme: she dreamed she was imprisoned in an inaccessible castle….’

(The Queen of Night’s castle? Isn’t this incredible?)

‘…but the castle had the form and shape of herself;…’

(Phenomenal, eh? I mean, why a castle? You know, if it was herself, what was… But how interesting compared to Cancer, no? And The Magical Carousel? How absolutely fascinating because obviously that castle image is very apropos. Witness H’s dream about the Ashram and her life at present in the form of a castle, and all connected with Diti and Cancer…)

‘…she dreamed of enchantments, bewitchments, entrancements; she dreamed that she had become a living, sentient statue of stone; she dreamed that the world had come to a stop;…’

(Isn’t it remarkable, this intense contraction?)

‘…she dreamed that she had fallen into a sleep so deep that nothing could awake her; she dreamed of a death which was different from death. Her family had difficulty waking her the next morning, and when she awoke there was intense consternation: ‘Rose,’ they cried, ‘wakeup! What’s the matter? Your expression, your position…You’re so still and so strange.’ Miss R. could not answer, but turned her eyes to the wardrobe mirror, and there she saw that her dreams had come true. The local doctor was brisk and unhelpful: ‘Catatonia,’ he said; ‘flexibilitis cerea. What can you expect with the life she’s been leading? She’s broken her heart over one of those bums. Keep her quiet and feed her – she’ll be fine in a week.’

‘But Miss R. was not to recover for a week, or a year or forty-three years. She recovered the ability to speak in short sentences, or to make sudden movements before she froze up again.’

(A living tomb. Literally, huh?)

‘She showed, increasingly, a forced retraction of her neck and her eyes – a state of almost continuous oculogyric crisis, [The eyes become fixed] broken only by sleep, meals and occasional ‘releases’. She was alert, and seemed to notice what went on around her; she lost none of her affection for her numerous family – and they lost none of their affection for her; but she seemed absorbed and preoccupied in some unimaginable state. For the most part, she showed no signs of distress, and no signs of anything save intense concentration: ‘She looked,’ said one of her sisters, ‘as if she were trying her hardest to remember something – or, maybe, doing her damnedest to forget something. Whatever it was, it took all her attention.’ In her years at home, and subsequently in hospital, her family did their utmost to penetrate this absorption, to learn what was going on with their beloved ‘kid’ sister. With them – and, much later, with me – Miss R. was exceedingly candid, but whatever she said seemed cryptic and gnomic, and yet at the same time disquietingly clear.

The following are typical of some of the ‘dialogues’ I had with Miss R.:
‘What are you thinking about, Rosie?’
‘Nothing, just nothing.’
‘But how can you possibly be thinking of nothing?’
‘It’s dead easy, once you know how.’
‘How exactly do you think about nothing?’
‘One way is to think about the same thing again and again. Like 2=2=2=2=2; or, I am what I am what I am what I am. It’s the same thing with my posture. My posture continually leads to itself.’

(You see, this ‘contraction’ and turning back on itself all the time…)

‘Whatever I do or whatever I think leads deeper and deeper into itself. And then there are maps. I think of a map; then a map of that map; then a map of that map of that map, and each map perfect, though smaller and smaller… Worlds within worlds within worlds within worlds. Once I get going I can’t possibly stop. It’s like being caught between mirrors, or echoes, or something. Or being caught on a merry-go-round which won’t come to a stop.’    (Ibid, pp. 68-69)

It’s like all those mirrors of the Queen of Night’s castle…and with the labyrinth of Cancerland, – and all this is taking place in the United States: Cancer personified! She even mentions a ‘merry-go-round’!

There’s this uncontrollable motion with these people. You see that the whole motor thing is completely haywire and they cannot control their movements anymore. And this question of uncontrollable motion is interesting in relation to Cancer too [by its relation to the mechanical, cellular mind].

What an extraordinary happening! I mean, the things that happen on this planet and that people really can’t link to anything. Like this man [Sacks] who is so concerned about making sense of this illness, and the book is beautiful in this respect. He goes into subjects that are quite deep toward the end. But you can see that he is just baffled by this phenomenon but that he has no way… How can you explain something like this? How can you explain the nature of the illness, that is, the pathology of the illness. Or how can you explain, then, something even more: How the devil did it come about? Why did it leave? That’s the crux of it. I mean, why did it affect people at that period? And then of course, for me it’s even more interesting, that particular period connected to the time when they awoke which involved his whole… By that time that ‘seed’ was there.

Then when they [the patients] awoke there is this speed… This speeded up action from that point on; and then these people again carried away and used in this; and then coming out and speaking and some of the most incredible things they’re saying. Just the state that they are describing is something extraordinary. You have to admit that it is phenomenal that, as I say, this isn’t schizophrenia, this is the vital-physical. This is the motor being, the instinctive, the vital-physical, where mentally they’re undisturbed in a way, except that they don’t have the link by which to… They’ve lost that link-up there, where they can observe and they can experience the states, but they can’t express it; then when they were put on this drug they were able to express it but speeded up so much that it would be even more disastrous.

They take the drug for a while…suddenly, almost immediately went into this extraordinary awakening where they thought that they were cured, you know. And then suddenly start these catastrophic experiences. They had to stop the drug. Invariably, there was hardly one or two cases where they could keep on giving it. He had to constantly vary the doses.  He had to then finally stop it in some cases because they got so bad, they got so hyped up, let’s say, that then they had to stop it entirely.

So they used to call it a hell and yet at the same time it was this heaven because it took them out of their sleep. But then it became a living hell. Sure, because, you see, this is the whole thing: their time experience, as the experience of consciousness, the vehicle of consciousness… When they were asleep it was contracted, and that’s why a lot of them didn’t age. They looked half their age. Their aging process even went to sleep…


Just on those terms, science ought to go wild over this.


He mentions it so often, regarding age, that most of them looked half their age. That to me is phenomenal. This is not just a sleep, because in a normal sleep you age. Something else was put to sleep…and what it was is their time-experience. Like that man who accomplished his action in a whole day instead of a few seconds. Obviously he wouldn’t age as much, no? But then when they gave him the drug this whole thing speeded up and it was affecting again the particular ‘clock’.


It’s clear, as you say, it’s the vital-physical.


Yes, exactly, because I’ve always described my work…now at the third level, the vital. That’s why I can deal with time, because that’s really where time becomes crystallised, in these periods. That is, in these periods we can begin to define.


Wasn’t it in that period when Sri Aurobindo and the Mother’s yoga was going on in the vital levels and they were predicting they would progressively begin to look younger. And then the whole thing came to a stop and they started aging. And they got down to the physical.


I was also reading this in the third volume, because I start describing this episode, you know, of the beginning of the Age, and that’s how I led up to this point about these four conjunct Powers. So, I was describing the ‘brilliant period’ of the Ashram. It was in the vital. Then he [Sri Aurobindo] put his foot down and stopped the whole thing and they plunged into the physical, and then of course started all the illnesses, started everything.

Now, that’s the same thing that happened with these patients because by that time they were just going into their deep slumber and then even the outburst of the illness itself came to an end. And then they were just left there. So they were left there 50 years! I mean, can you imagine? You know, from 1927…26, 27, 28. It would be interesting to get the exact dates. He gives the years but it would be interesting really to know when was the last recorded case? In any case, it was then 50 years later when they were awakened. And they were put into this sleep. And coinciding with the exact time of Sri Aurobindo’s Enhancement and virtually his own awakening.

I mean, that’s what happened in 1971, which was the beginning, with the return to India. This was the beginning then of the action of that Seed. And then of course, that was my ‘awakening’…and that was the channel through which this had to be done. Then, in 1976, came this final awareness of precisely that ‘seed’.

And all during this time, these poor unfortunate souls have been…I mean, you can’t even call them ‘sacrifices’ because it doesn’t make much sense unless there’s some reason why this had to happen, that there had to be a collective process also that accompanied this…

So, what is the reason that such a thing was necessary. That is, was it necessary, or was it simply a projection of what they were doing and that it was uncontrollable in the sense that since the field is one, this thing had to have certain repercussions. Or was it really a tactical necessity. You know, that there should be this certain amount of people, like this mass that was there following this process… that it was necessary for his own realisation – to root this on the Earth – that this group consciousness should have lived this experience. It would seem that there would be some sense to the thing like this because, since you’re dealing in the Supramental Manifestation with this vertical/horizontal, with this individual and the collectivity all the time. There’s always an interrelation and harmonisation of that. You would think that this was the means by which his yoga was affecting the collective experience and that this was part of the mechanism, part of the tactics, let’s say.

Then look, how interesting in his own yoga. I mean, how from that point on…from the point when this illness stopped he withdrew and he was confined. And all these people were confined from that point on, I mean literally confined. As this woman describes a castle that was her own self, her own being, and there he is in this room through this whole period and this ‘confinement’. Then, of course, experiencing this speeding up of the consciousness by this contractive process. But you know, it’s really at the fourth level then when this speed comes to the physical. You understand that that is the essence of matter.


Actually also, even the way he went was through a coma, wasn’t it?


It was, but that strange ‘coma’, eh? Where he’d come out [of it] and go in and come out. But virtually he was…that’s it, he was in a coma. Deeper sleep than that?

Isn’t it absolutely fascinating? How this played itself out so perfectly in the conditions of his own tapasya, you know. This we’ve known and discussed so many times, but in cases like this, I’m absolutely in awe of the way these details take shape. And then, – why? I mean, it’s clear: because these correspond to cosmic principles. As I write in the third volume, this is the very process of creation. So you get down to that seed level where that speed is, where this confinement of his consciousness comes to such a degree, you know, where the speed is such that it generates that energy that binds and that is the core of matter. And that happened then, you see…I mean, that played itself out on Earth, let’s say, from ’69 on, when his Enhancement started and then ended with his return to India. You see how absolutely remarkable…but that’s when you get to the physical level. Precisely. That’s it… That symbol of coming as a small child…I mean, the whole thing plays itself out so beautifully, you know.

When I was reading this, I have to say, all along I was just simply overwhelmed by this phenomenon…the descriptions of this illness. Oh, this fact, as I was saying before, that this is of the vital-physical, that’s where…And these people…the mind is almost intact except insofar as it uses the brain and the brain becomes afflicted to some extent. But you know, obviously then some distortions at a certain point come in, especially when they were speeded up. That’s when they started having hallucinations and everything. But when they were in that state…that was the pathetic thing about it, that there is this consciousness that’s aware of the condition and can do nothing. It’s not schizophrenia. This is a split on that vital-physical motor level. Schizophrenia is a mental condition, an aberration, so there’s nobody witnessing it any more. There is no consciousness of the pain even, because all of that is completely shattered. But here the tragedy is that they were aware. They are not mentally disturbed, as such.

And so, you have to look at all of these things that happen, like AIDS…Clear, I mean, I tried to bring that out – about how much connected it was to something that’s being worked out, this whole guilt… It’s evident that something like this just doesn’t happen because of promiscuous sex. There’s got to be a consciousness factor behind it that’s causing it. When it…it happens on an individual level, imagine on a collective level! Obviously it’s got to gain force.

The remarkable work this man has done, and so dedicated, sensitive, you know, and in his dealing…


That’s the feeling you get from his descriptions.


Of course being English, he has really a very fine use of the language. Certain portions are so beautifully poetic. There’s one place here that…I think it was in his Epilogue… Oh, he constantly talks about it as being ‘in a black hole’. One of these women who would go from extremes, fluctuating between a ‘black hole’ and a ‘super-nova’. Before the awakening she was this black hole. I mean, can it be a more interesting description? Because for me that’s exactly what it is, when this time lengthens then to such an extent where it virtually comes to a stop. And that is what that woman, Rose, was describing: that the world stopped. And then of course this ‘super-nova explosion’…

Here’s a footnote to this Epilogue:

‘There has been a continual struggle to understand the nature of “space” (and “time”, and indeed “reality”) insofar as it may have a peculiar character for the Parkinsonian. In Awakenings (1973) I saw these peculiarities as “Einsteinian” in nature, “a systematic disorder of space-time parameters”, “a systematic warping of coordinate-systems”, though there was a certain paradox or contradiction inherent in such notions, which became explicit, an oxymoron, when I spoke of “Einsteinian delirium”.’ (Ibid, p. 318)

Oh, to have been able to discuss with this man, I mean this question of focus on the time factor and see how you can deal with it. I don’t know, in medicine how could they? Because this is a phenomenon of consciousness, a warp; a consciousness warp that expresses itself in their time experience and you do have these drugs that speed up the consciousness, which is clearly what L-DOPA was doing too. But that doesn’t heal, I mean it doesn’t solve anything. In fact, it was complete imbalance in most of the cases, where they really went off.

There were some portions here I wanted to remark on…where he talks about love, and that necessity….

You know that many of these patients were able to attain a sort of accommodation because they had some contact, some love, some human warmth there; that they forged a relationship with either someone in the hospital or family members and that helped them. But at the same time, in other cases where they lost that element then they died immediately; and they just sort of ‘turned off’.

Then there is another very interesting thing: that a certain ‘something’ was controlling the illness, because there are cases which he describes when no matter how much of that drug they gave, it had no effect at all. When the person sort of turned it off, it was turned off; and nothing, nothing could awaken them again. That there was an element that was clearly utilising all this and sort of even conscious of the awakening and able to turn it off when it wanted. Like the interesting cases of several he describes of having this clear premonition of their death during the night, and saying… One lady saying goodbye to everybody: I’m going to die! And then she goes to sleep, and doesn’t wake up again! And there are several of them like that, that knew exactly, you know, when they were… This is quite something because these are states and perceptions that the ordinary human being doesn’t attain. So that alone should have been enough to really make people… Well, as he did – to seek to find the ‘metaphysical’ aspect to all this. Metaphysical, in his terms, meaning just something beyond the physical, some other element. He goes on about this: we have to take this into consideration if we want to understand this disease.


To understand disease itself.


Of course, but here you have a clear example of… It’s like an experience, an experiment that was so concise that you could follow it; because it was over a period in which they were put to sleep and then awakened, you could deal with this. Isn’t it incredible? Something here…

‘One must allow the possibility of an almost limitless repertoire of functional reorganisations and accommodations of all types, from cellular, chemical and hormonal levels, to the organisation of the self – the “will to get well”. One sees again and again, not merely in the context of L-DOPA and Parkinsonism, but in cancer, tuberculosis, neurosis – all diseases – remarkable, unexpected and “inexplicable” resolutions, at times when it seems that everything is lost. One must allow – with surprise, with delight – that such things happen, and that they can happen to patients on L-DOPA as well. Why they should happen, and what indeed is happening, are questions which it is not yet in our power to answer; for health goes deeper than any disease.’ (Ibid, pp. 236-37.)

There’s a certain portion where he talks about the personal, and the person, how much this is so wrapped up with this experience. Really remarkable.

And now there is this other thing brought to my attention, this ‘Sudden Infant Death’, ‘Crib Death’. Now you have a new phenomenon. I’ve got to get the dates on this; I really want to see when the first such deaths were being reported. But it’s clear that this is going to be the thing that’s winding up this Cancer degree, in the Precession [of the Equinoxes]. This is going to be…to play itself out until the end of the cycle, – which ends in 1998; that this too is connected to something and probably going to be accentuated in the last 9 years, then bringing the shift to the next degree, which will be Leo. So it really makes you wonder, like…to what extremes is this going to go? Here you have 7000 babies dying annually – that’s a lot in a population that is not growing so much, you know. And then, how can you control it? Suppose tomorrow all the babies in America decide they are going to leave like this and you can’t do a damn thing about it! They already can’t handle AIDS: that’s gone completely out of their control.

And now there is this phenomenon of these babies that just take this decision to leave their bodies. Clearly, as clear as a bell – before that connection is made. How fascinating: Those first 6 months when they haven’t become enmeshed in this web, or this network of time on this planet through the lived conscious experience. Obviously, it has to be when they are in a state when they are not living that conscious experience yet.

I mean, I remember P, for example, how long it took him to really get rooted down here – how long? 12 years before he was really in his body; and those first 6 years…Good God, he was elsewhere most of the time, you know. I mean, it wasn’t something like ‘going away’. It was a state of being. His state of consciousness was like that all the time.

So, these little infants, clear, they just slip through the skull there – that’s wide open – as a symbol, really. Not that it would impede it. It’s the opening in the cranium that indicates that that rooting has not yet really taken place. There they go! They take this decision to leave. Now, why do they take that decision? What are they playing out?

Now, it’s clear that as these [sleeping-sickness] patients were representing a tapasya that was going on in the transcendent-cosmic level and they were following the Transcendent’s sleep and awakening, these patients, these babies, are describing a work that is going on in our times, which means also a greater consciousness in birth, in the birth process, as well as the death process. (I’ve written about this – this conscious death.) But, if they are living this, it’s playing out the drama of this critical juncture that we’ve reached on this planet, where clearly they’re the ones that don’t want to hang around to see it, you know. And they consciously leave.

I mean, the atmosphere on the Earth must be so terrible. Imagine a certain awareness in the process of birth, where you are really conscious of those ‘layers’ which most human beings don’t feel. Imagine the chaos which must be going on in there. And that if you retain a certain consciousness and you realise what’s going to hit this planet, let’s say – because of all this chaos which is first felt up in those planes – these little creatures don’t want any part of it, you know? And they are playing out a certain collective choice to leave. And so, it kind of makes a mockery of all this stuff about being lifted off the planet, because you don’t need a space ship to come and get you. Here’s a case – you just leave!


So juvenile.


It is so juvenile… So many things can be the channels for that departure: illnesses, wars, any destruction for that matter. But, I mean, it’s people that always want to cling to…who they are in themselves, in their bodies, as they know them. So, let’s go off on a space ship and then return after it’s all over! It may not play itself out so easily, you know. But these little creatures are definitely sending a signal. And they are, in some way, elements to describe a particular transition right now in these last 12-15 years….

You know, Cancer is the Night; then you go to the everlasting Day….



26 November 1986


I finished that book last night, and I wanted to just add a few words, because I was looking for some dates there: when he actually started using this drug. Apparently it was released or ready for use in 1967. It reminded me of Sri Aurobindo once saying that by 1967 his work would have reached a decisive phase. That was 9 years before ’76 – I always remember that. Anyway, in ’69 they started. There’s one case he mentions, where they started in March administering this thing. Clearly in the spring. The main thrust was from May into the summer. That’s when the thing really got going.

But I can’t tell you how much this has impressed me, this reading. All last night…I came to the end of it and he mentions as a footnote to his epilogue – a long footnote about this ‘Einsteinian delirium’, or something. Because he talks about this time-space warp that’s so noticeable in what these people are living. And then that really brought up some more interesting facts that we didn’t discuss yesterday.

The fact is there is this awakening, like I was talking about, in the Transcendent, as I wrote in the third volume. The awakening in the cosmic dimension – sort of like this ‘integrating process’, as it becomes conscious in all these dimensions. And these people… It is clear, that in this process, this sleep they go into, they become then possessed, really, by the powers in those other planes. That this sleep creates conditions in this vital-physical over which they have no more control eventually. They gradually become totally possessed by this. But the possession, as long as they are not awakened, just means that. It means that they are like in this cosmic womb, this tomb.

When they awakened these people that’s when all these bizarre things really started happening, because they were then just this ‘field’, and they couldn’t control it. A lot of them speak about a ‘force’ just coming like…blocking them, stopping them dead in their tracks…whatever. And all kinds of hallucinations, seeing beings. They became these fields then – because they are open in that dimension. That’s the whole point.


            So they do have some subtle vision?


Yes, yes, hallucinations definitely. There was one lady who was visited every night by a nice gentleman; and he [Sacks] sort of overlooked it, as if to say: Well, it was her companion! He would come in through the window every night!

And then there was this other fellow, Leonard, who was Sacks’ favourite there. He was really articulate in what he was experiencing, to a very high degree, I must say. He had this painting, sort of like the wild west; some town in the wild west. He used to hallucinate with that. During his drug days, when he was taking this drug, he really went wild. And then became, as happened usually… You know they would let themselves go into hallucinations, but then eventually with this drug, those hallucinations overpowered them. They couldn’t block them out. That had opened to all that, awoken all that, and they were in this strange way cosmicised. You know what I mean? Their beings, through this sleep process, whatever it was that happened. This is the way I can see it: Whatever it was that happened to them in those long periods of sleep, especially during the illness as such, allowed for this kind of… Like an interpenetration, or something, with these other dimensions and these forces. I mean, they really lived the process of this womb that’s their tomb, eventually.

I had an experience in Pondicherry like that. I think I may have told you. Once I woke up in the middle of the night. The mosquito net over the bed was really like the womb of the Mother – the cosmic Womb. And then it just became larger and larger, to become the city, and then finally the whole earth, and then the whole universe. And it was this enveloping consciousness.

But then, it was very interesting because Sri Aurobindo was there too. That was when I had this clear realisation of these 3 Powers and how with this Triad all the possible relations were there, you see.

But there was a phase after that, in the days that followed, where at times I felt this being like a prison, you know, and I could understand very well why it was that people wanted to flee from that. Then on the basis of all those experiences – they lasted for many days – I was writing in the second volume [of The New Way] about the Room, going into the Room…and how it becomes, when one hasn’t made the breakthrough… It is…this womb is like a prison. Then that is why many of those realisers just shot off and tried to dissolve the whole cosmic manifestation. Because it seemed like a prison. And of course if you don’t go beyond that point it is a prison.

And these patients…think of it – there were about 3 million people afflicted, which means that there were a lot of people who were overtaken by the forces on those planes. I mean, look what was going on! Then you had the Second World War – that whole period then was tremendously important occultly. Really the period in which the Mother was so active, and that was her dimension [the Cosmic]. All this was happening in there.

There is another interesting factor, because this last degree of the sign…this would have happened in the last 9 years just preceding entry into Aquarius. So you could say, the last degree of Pisces, the very last seconds of degree, you see, of the sign of Pisces, (in retrograde motion, of course)…so, I’ve always found that the last degree is always the most intense. When a person is born with the sun in that very last degree, it’s really not the other sign yet until you get over the hump into the zero degree of the next sign. But it’s like the last death breath. You know where a person comes back to life again and you think he is going to survive, and then he collapses again. So, it’s like this: Those last 9 years of an Age have to be very, very intense indeed and this obviously was one of the expressions.

But what was happening in the whole world was so fascinating. Think of it: the depression, the collapse, – monetary. Look at what was caving in then! Everything was just caving in, and all this… Because you see now, even with the difficult financial situations in the world, somehow they are always propped up. You don’t get the feeling that it is ever going to be possible…something like that – a depression – again, on such a massive scale. World wide and in the States.


Such a peculiar thing. Take a place like New Zealand. However could they have experienced it in a land of plenty like that? But they went through the same thing.


What is behind it? What is manipulating all this? It doesn’t have any logic. Of course, maybe in economics they could explain it because certain key factors work worldwide. But surely there must be some way to protect yourself. As you say, a place like New Zealand ought to be able to survive – with a handful of people on it, you know.


I know, only 2 million people at that time. It was a whole trade breakdown too. And of course the States being the focal point.


Well, but at the same time, was it [the USA] really so much a force? It wasn’t the power that it is now for sure; or that it became after the war. Or after the depression, as a matter of fact. That’s when it started getting itself together.

But anyway, the interesting thing is that these are really indications of cosmic forces working and manifesting like this. If you really see the influences prevailing and you see where it’s headed, you can pin-point…and you can see what it’s building up, what it is breaking down.


Whereas now, it is not on that cosmic level – more individual. Terrorism, for example. Individuals, sort of isolated.


It’s very different now. And then, in the 20s, 30s, a little before, you really had mass movements. Everything seemed far less conscious, you know. The individual was less aware, so… Look at Nazism, how that was able to come and take possession of people. What’s comparable today? Iran and what is going on there? I mean that’s minute compared to… They have never been able to get that power together. That power is able to work isolated, you know, for those people. Period. But in Germany, this was something that went far beyond and involved the whole world. Quite different you see…


That it was able to take possession of a nation which was in a crucial position, that’s the other thing too. That’s the difference between…Iran, what is it?


No, you’re right. It’s not a key factor at this point but Germany then was. Europe was.


            Germany was the cockpit of Europe.


So, this has been an interesting experience to realise that this was happening. I had no idea of this. Then it was so beautiful when I was reading those chapters in Volume 3 describing this exact process – awakening in the cosmic dimension. I mean, the words were so… And the Absolute’s sleep, the Transcendent’s sleep and then this contraction [power] of the Mother. These poor people. This is actually what they were put through – this contraction like that. Phenomenal.

And this hell and heaven that they experienced with this drug that released them. But then, the release was what? The release was an opening in those dimensions, you understand, over which they had no control. That’s why they went so berserk. Sure, he awoke then – but I’m telling you, something was cosmicised in these people. Cosmicised, not meaning in the sense of cosmic consciousness but physical-vital – some interpenetration there during that sleep period. Then they had no control over that any more. Yet, their mind was aware. And so, he awakens them and they are at the mercy of this thing, and so before long they are plunged into this absolute hell and with no control whatsoever.


It’s like taking drugs, LSD…


Exactly. But even more interesting because in a sense they are far more aware than the person who is… Because it was not on the mental level, like a schizophrenic. It was a completely different manifestation. That’s why also, having been so cosmicised like that, they had this time-warp, you see. And he remarks on that in the very last pages of the book: this immense slowing down; and then with the drug just the contrary – this acceleration of everything. Just fascinating, huh?

I don’t know if any of these patients are still alive. But when the last one goes that’s the end of it, you know. I mean, it hasn’t repeated itself; it’s not likely to repeat itself. It’s just going to be this interesting phenomenon that hit the Earth and left. Because you know there are other sleeping-sicknesses. I remember…the tsetse fly carries this virus in Africa. But I don’t think anything of this nature happens. This then develops into Parkinsonism, but with the difference that apparently – this is another interesting thing – it doesn’t degenerate, whereas the real Parkinson’s Disease is a progressive degeneration. It gets worse and worse. These, they remain at the level of their illness. It doesn’t progress, except of course when he was giving the drug. Then all these phenomena started happening. But it’s different from the ordinary Parkinson’s Disease; it’s not degenerative like that. So they stay, for as long as they live, in that condition permanently.

And this fellow, Leonard, that he writes about… It’s very curious: he couldn’t speak. So being very articulate and all, he had to write it out, tap it out, tap out his words. But then, he’s given this drug and he starts bellowing out! Phenomenal, no? I mean, like that – from one day to the next. And then…Okay, that’s fine – his first awakening… And progressively it got worse. He became an absolute demon with all kinds of hallucinations, of being the Messiah, and everything. Completely, obviously overtaken, and since he probably had a better instrument for something like that, these forces really wrecked havoc. So then they had to stop all of that; and of course stopped his speaking, because he couldn’t speak without this drug. And then, at times they used it again but it didn’t have any effect. Finally, after years, maybe 12 years, they used it, and again he started that bellowing speech….

Then, there was this Rose…when she was awoken, she awakened to the world of 1926, when she fell ill. Fifty years earlier, you know, forty years earlier. She couldn’t cope with this fact that the world wasn’t 1926 and that she had lost 40 years of her life. So they had to just stop the whole thing.

There’s a photograph of her and it is so impressive. She is just fixed, you know, frozen. She is the one who is going on about becoming this castle [in dream] and then looking and seeing herself [in the mirror] having become fixated, tomb-like creature. I mean, tremendous….

You see, with illness and all, eventually there has got to come some higher understanding, when they really realise that most illnesses have some sort of connection with some cosmic force manifesting, you know? And that…AIDS is like that. All right. It’s this process of guilt, and all. But there is obviously some force active. I mean, to activate all of that. To push it forward, to get this worked out in some way.

And now it’s getting even more and more acute… [tape ends here].


Patrizia Norelli-Bachelet

Aeon Centre of Cosmology
Kodaikanal, November 1986

Art and the Symbol Forms of Supermind

In continuing my reading of C.S. Nott’s book, Teachings of Gurdjieff (Routledge & Kegan Paul), I have come to see that there are some basic misconceptions about objective art, or rather, discrepancies in definitions. As you know, the Gurdjieff school is influenced strongly by the Christian and Sufi schools. Nott, in discussing architectural pieces he believes to be examples of objective art, mentions several belonging to those traditions. One is the Taj Mahal in northern India; then certain Gothic Cathedrals in France. But I do not agree with this assessment, and I think the definition Gurdjieff himself provides as reproduced in Nott’s book, makes it clear that objective art in architecture is not just superior aesthetics. For can we consider the Taj Mahal as anything other than a masterpiece of exquisite proportions. True, it reaches a pinnacle in this sort of expression, and its harmony is indeed mathematical, as Mr. G emphasises. A similar harmony was known to the Greeks and to the Renaissance masters. Even today in the Orient there are schools where mathematics form the basis of art. But this, to my mind, does not qualify a piece to be considered objective art, even as defined by Gurdjieff:

‘Love not art with your feelings. Real art is based on mathematics.  It is a kind of script with an inner and outer meaning. In early times, conscious men – who composed music, designed statues and images, painted pictures and constructed buildings – all of which were such that they had a definite effect on people who came in contact with them: on their feelings and senses.’

(p. 67, emphasis P.N-B.)

The question of ‘meaning’ is the important part of the above information. In terms of my work, that ‘meaning’ refers to knowledge, and especially the supramental Gnosis. Hence, a piece of objective art is indeed like a book with a script emerging from the forms.

In my last letter I referred to the Mother’s Chamber as such a ‘book’, and the script being the new Language that evolved simultaneously with her creative act of Seeing. Remember, these two aspects of the Temple began to ‘descend’ at the same time. The Mother had her first experience of the Temple in the first days of January, 1970. During that period she also carried out the second and most important phase of the process when she gave the ‘measure’ of the Vision, the formula (in the exact measurements of the Chamber) which would link the higher planes in which the Temple exists in essence with our physical world of form. Certainly that was by far the most important part of the process, without which no real connection could be made between these dimensions. Without that Measure, the vision would not have had any power to influence happenings on Earth. It would have remained a vision above, a seeing which only sporadically seekers could enjoy in an altered state of consciousness, disengaged from the body, not one rooted in the Earth dimension and hence able to serve in the Supramental Manifestation in the manner in which her Temple was destined.

When the Seeing and the act of Measuring were completed in those first few days of January, 1970, the next phase of the descent took place in March immediately thereafter, – in another part of the world. That was when I saw The Magical Carousel, and recorded that seeing. If you recall, the 10th Chapter gives an accurate description of the Mother’s Chamber, in particular its ‘essence’, or the precise nature of that inner content or meaning, that ‘script’, to use Gurdjieff’s term; for this was the beginning of the descent of the Knowledge connected with the Temple, the symbol-heart of the new city-consciousness. Indeed, the seeing was so complete – notwithstanding that I had no connection with the Mother at the time – that it incorporated certain aspects of the difficulties in the execution of the plan which were to surface several years later and were to become key elements of discord when we sought to have the Mother’s original plan reincorporated in Auroville, and not the architect’s modified version. Among others were the single entry into the chamber through the floor, and the walls without any openings. In The Magical Carousel, these specifications that the Mother insisted upon were confirmed when the story describes how the children ran their hands around the walls of the chamber to see if there were any openings, as well as the manner in which they ‘rise’ into the Room, rather than by any entry through the walls. And then there was, of course, the main point: the hole in the centre of the Room, which is closed as the story describes by the rising presence of the Time-spirit into the Chamber.

These were some of the principal items that were subsequently altered by the architects and which, until 1976, we sought to have reincorporated in the building, since it was still possible to do so at that time. These attempts failed, however, and the result is the meaningless piece of contemporary architecture that has arisen at the centre of Auroville. There is no element of objective art in that structure, contrary to the plan the Mother gave which is the purest expression of objective art.

The point I wish to make is that concurrently with the Mother’s seeing of the Temple, the ‘script’ also began to descend into our physical world in which language – name and form – is a vital ingredient. Language, the body of the Word, is the vehicle of the Knowledge, or ‘essence’. Hence, it is understandable that in dealing with a piece of true objective art, this special language with its own perfection and integrality of form, would come into being together with the Mother’s original Seeing. The years that followed witnessed the consolidation of the true Temple at the heart of the new Creation, through the ‘Yoga of the Chamber’ which it gave rise to, – a central feature of our work over the past 15 years. This has revealed the manner in which the gnostic species will come into being through the evolutionary process. Indeed, the nucleus of the new Creation has already evolved as a result of that yogic process which the Temple’s descent set in motion.

In contrast, what is the ‘script’ of the Taj Mahal? Or the Gothic Cathedrals, which are purported to be examples of objective art? Certainly there is a superior understanding of architecture in those creations, a true sense of the sacred even. But knowledge and above all process are lacking in those structures. An atmosphere is indeed created to carry the viewer into an experience that was central to Christianity in the Gothic Cathedrals; for example, the littleness of the human being vis-à-vis the Creator, which seems to have reflected the consciousness prevailing at the time the Cathedrals came into being. Higher authority, be this religious or secular, was overpowering and omnipotent. And this is accurately conveyed in certain Gothic Cathedrals. The experience of God that comes to the viewer in such a structure is perfectly in tune with the conceptual appreciation of the Judeo-Christian divinity.

But the Gothic Cathedral goes no farther than that. It does not encompass process, higher cosmic harmonies, and hence it does not convey the ‘laws’ that are operative to bring into the Earth’s atmosphere the essence and powers which true objective art is meant to do, when indeed such structures contain ‘scripts’ of higher knowledge and its consequent power. In a word, the Gothic Cathedral makes no link between the higher and lower planes.

Nott refers to the creation of the Cathedrals as being products of conscious processes, and is fascinated by the fact that their execution was anonymously carried out. In contrast we have the spirit of the Renaissance that followed, when the individual’s role in the creative process became supreme. The ego of the artist was never so glorified and had never attained such heights!

Though there was clearly a purpose behind the design and construction of certain Gothic Cathedrals, this alone does not qualify them to be considered objective art. The anonymity of the execution is, of course, a paramount aspect of all true sacred art and architecture. We find this to be the case still today in India, though a degeneration is also beginning in this respect here.

India still maintains the pure traditions of sacred architecture. But please note that I am making a clear distinction between various architectural forms in this analysis. One is aesthetic and deals mainly with mathematical proportions for the purpose of carrying the viewer into a higher experience of art for the sake of perfection and beauty of form, and little else; the Taj Mahal, for example. Another is the sacred, which encourages an experience proper to the religion or mystical bent that the structure focuses on, – such as the Gothic Cathedral, or even many temples in India and throughout the Orient. Today we do not find sacred architecture coming up in the West. Church building has fallen entirely into the hands of contemporary university trained architects. It is out of the realm of sacred art. An example is the recently constructed Baha’i Temple in New Delhi, opened to the public in late 1986.

In the East, however, this art form is still alive. In consequence, the tradition of anonymity continues. In India, for example, the name of the architect is never prominent in the execution of a new temple or a sculptor in the fashioning of a special idol; nor are the names known of the architects in the construction of the temples of antiquity. However, one questions how long this tradition will be able to survive, inasmuch as the government of India, in an effort to stimulate the crafts and honour good craftsmanship, to revitalise certain aspects of India’s ancient heritage and culture, is interfering in this tradition by conferring awards on select craftsmen, thus endangering that essential feature of anonymity in the execution of sacred art.

This would seem to be a laudable development from the standpoint of good government. But if it is carried to extremes, it is certain to corrode the true tradition and the imperative need to cultivate the correct poise in the executor with regard to the source of inspiration and the creative process, which deal with higher experiences of consciousness.

But, let us be more specific. The important feature of such art and architecture is the consciousness out of which the vision arose. In true sacred architecture (not to speak of objective art), there was always a seer to whom the vision came (like the Mother in the vision of the Temple). This vision was then passed on to the executors, who never interfered in the fashioning process. Out of this, very detailed shastras, or scriptures, have evolved over the centuries, dealing with the question of accurate Measure and Form in the effort to secure that the purity of the original vision be ever maintained and no distortions creep in with the passage of time when the vision is reproduced over the ages. These Shastras are still followed meticulously today in the fashioning of the idols and in temple building in India. However, you can easily appreciate that constrictions of this nature are intolerable to the Western architect, a truth that was amply proven in the construction of the Mother’s temple in Auroville, in which the execution was entirely in the hands of architects from the West.

Thus the Seer to whom the vision came remained always the supreme authority in the creative process involving sacred forms, never the architect, the sculptor or the painter. In the West this tradition does not exist. But even regarding India we have to consider the deeper issues which lie behind the tradition and assess just where that tradition stands today. This draws the discussion once again to the Mother’s Temple and the question of true objective art in contrast to the sacred experience or the aesthetic. We can make certain comparisons for this purpose between Christian sacred architecture and Indian. I trust that this will reveal what is lacking in those creations that tend to carry the viewer into the realm of aesthetics rather than the sacred in art.

Conditioned as the Westerner is by aesthetics, which many have little to do with the sacred, and nothing to do with objective art, it is understandable that when the West made a closer contact with the East during the colonial period, there could be no proper evaluation of the spiritual world expressing itself in the eastern art and culture that the colonialists met. The yardstick used for the purpose was far removed from the Indian experience and tradition. The Westerner is conditioned by the glorified persona of the artist and by aesthetics in his experience of the sacred in religious art. And this aesthetic yardstick is wholly subjective. But what do we find in India, whose sacred art is still today rooted in the higher experience and seeing of seers and maintained through a formidable body of Shastras?

We find idols and temples fashioned according to accurate measurements which, as I explained in my first letter to you, serve to link the higher planes where Seeing takes place to the physical dimension in which we live. Not as a ‘conscious’ process, but resulting from the condition of being of the Seer. Thus the important feature is that measure. Therefore, how can the Westerner, whose conditioning is so foreign to this tradition with its respect for that condition of Being, ever understand the imagery of the Hindu idols and temples when he is completely closed in the box of aesthetics and personality and has never penetrated the planes in which the Indian Gods and Goddesses have their ‘abode’?

Failing to do this, the western critic cannot understand the forms those Godheads require in order to make the link from plane to plane and thereby bring into being on Earth a focus of living energy. The Hindu idol captures a living force, for which purpose it has its particular design and measure which must, at all costs, be respected.

In the age when the numerous Hindu Godheads came into being – namely during the 8th Manifestation, or between 2000 and 8000 years ago – Hindu imagery perfectly served the purpose of linking the planes that had been reached then via the spiritual experience of the sages. These were the Overmental planes, to use Sri Aurobindo’s terminology. That was the apex that had been reached during the 8th Manifestation. The exuberant abundance of forms, to name just one feature, is a clear reflection of the Overmental Consciousness, a step below the Supramental.

The point I wish to make is that in India the tradition of sacred and objective art has been preserved throughout the ages without interruption. That is, the process and its purpose are known and still respected. And indeed it is in India that the renewal of these superior art forms is being carried out, to align the process with the forces operating in this new Manifestation, the 9th. For this is what the Mother’s Temple is: it is the element which carries the experience a step higher (though interestingly closer to the core of the most ancient Vedic truth-seeing). Her Temple, in its original purity, carries us to the Supramental plane above the Overmental, and accurately links our physical world with that higher one. Being objective architecture, it introduces at the same time the process whereby the principle of Supermind can secure itself at the heart of the new world and evolve from itself the new gnostic species on this planet.

India has always been central to the evolution of consciousness on Earth. But the entire world, India no less, is feeling the effects of the great transition of our times. This means we are experiencing all the travails and ‘labour pains’ inherent in the difficult transitional passage from one Age to another, from one plane to another, in the effort to carry the evolution of the species out of the limitations of the Overmental creation and extend our boundaries to the Supramental. Indeed, this brings me to the final point of this discussion, if it is to be complete: the question of cosmic harmonies.

All true higher sacred and objective art is grounded in a vision of cosmic harmonies. As I pointed out in my last letter, central to all art is the question of Form; and central to sacred and objective art is a Form that encompasses the cosmos; or rather, it evolves from a consciousness that is, at the very least, cosmicised. The Mother’s, for example. Hers being the Temple of this new age, a ‘new model of the universe’, it is clear that the ‘script’ it contains creates a new cosmic language. Name and Form combine to provide a new and enhanced seeing and experience of the cosmic harmonies. I have proven this to be true in my books, namely The Gnostic Circle and The New Way.

The important point is this: ‘As above, so below’, to borrow the ancient Hermetic aphorism. But what has happened to that ‘above’ in recent times, distinguishing it from all previous ages? Its measurement has increased. By three planets, to be exact. In view of this increase, it is clear that a temple, as objective art, must incorporate this increase. That is, it comes into being precisely as a product in function of this enhancement. Accordingly, to seek to install a piece of objective art from the past as the focal point of the present, as some people do, is both a futile and a foolish exercise. Only the experience in the present can faithfully encapsulate the new harmony and enhancement.

Therefore I have had to refer constantly to the Mother’s Temple in this discussion, otherwise it is meaningless, abstract and theoretical, – features completely foreign to true objective art. But I shall have to be faithful and true in this matter and refer to the entire experience of the descent of that Temple, in order to engender the fullest appreciation of true objective art and its purpose.

Thus we have a new vision of cosmic harmonies that perforce has to come into being in view of the enhanced measure of our solar system. Indeed, the new Language conveys just such a vision, the Gnostic Circle being the ‘alphabet’ which provides the elements necessary for the ‘construction’ of the Temple in The New Way. But I have always stressed the fact that India is the centre of the new Age, and it is therefore in India that the old has to be worked out and the new established. Let me now provide the details of this process, to prove this statement, and at the same time reveal the difficult destiny this central position brings.

Indeed, the Temple of the new Age and its objective art have descended in India, as well as the new Language. But why was India able to be this channel? It is because the truth-seeing has ever been present and preserved in this land. India’s vision of cosmic harmonies has always been a measure of 9, the measure, in fact, of our present-day enhanced solar system. This resulted from an incorporation of the lunar nodes (Rahu and Ketu) into the measure from very ancient times, – not as planets properly speaking, but as powers or notes, to use the Gnostic Circle terminology. One must bear in mind that the Indian school of imagery is concerned pre-eminently with capturing living powers, or cosmic forces, if you will, in the idol (or the temple). It is not a question of aesthetics at all, or even sacred art or architecture as such. These may be present, or they may not. The emphasis lies rather on content, on ‘essence’. The purpose in India is to bring into the Earth atmosphere the living power of what the idol or temple represents or proposes to capture from the higher planes. A Ganesh, for example, with his elephant head, does this superbly when the deity’s particular form and measure are respected in the fashioning. (In the same light, the zodiac was seen in the form of certain animal figures, insofar as these bore a relation to particular ‘essences’ that in our material world of name and form could be conveyed by the figures of those determined forms. The Horse and the Cow served the same purpose in ancient Vedic times.)

Now, it is evident that the question of enhancement of the System introduces something entirely new, and, I would add, revolutionary. There is a sort of displacement. The focus shifts to a higher poise; but this does not negate the former. When that previous seeing is faithful and true to the essence on the subtle plane and perfectly representative of the cosmic harmony as perceivable by the human ‘eye’, and therefore consonant with the level of consciousness of the species at that particular point in evolution, the former vision is integrated into the higher and finds its place in the new harmony of the fuller vision. This is what has happened in India because of the Supramental Manifestation. And already having a basic measure of 9 as its formula of cosmic harmonies, it has been possible to carry out this integrating, synthesising action in India, once the solar system increased to 9 planets in this century.

In the Mother’s Temple we have the new Name and Form. The Core of the Temple (see the frontispiece of The New Way, Volume 1&2), including the descending solar Ray, is the form that describes the supramental truth-seeing. This displaces the traditional Hindu idols from a central position; but it does not negate their truth and place in the new dispensation. Their truth remains a valid ingredient, and indeed it assists us in fully understanding the new and higher vision and the new Forms. Thus the supramental Creation becomes truly a gradation from truth to greater truth. There is increase, in the light, no longer a blind fumbling in darkness, with only faint sporadic glimpses of the truth to bear us along. And for this reason in my written works I have continuously referred to the Hindu Overmental Godheads, as well as to the myths from the Puranic period which superbly describe the nature and action of those powers on Earth. This has helped to prove the above statement that those former truths enhance our new experience significantly, without which its richness would not be so appreciable. We build on those foundations, as it were. And in this way the past is redeemed, the time-energy it hoards is released and thereby becomes the fuel for the rise to new and more all-encompassing heights.

However, this can come about only when the forms of the past are products of truth-seeing, and hence bear intrinsically the features of objective art. This tradition still lives in India, and the sanatana dharma (the eternal Truth) that is Hinduism provides for a continuous process of renewal in accordance with the cosmic harmonies and the demands of the Time-Spirit in any Age. An example of this renewing mechanism is presented in the Hindu line of the Ten Avatars, each of whom represents a stage in the evolutionary work in accordance with the conditions prevailing in any Manifestation.

Such a time of renewal is upon us, in this age of the last Avatar. Thus the core of the Mother’s Temple is, as she herself described it so wonderfully, ‘the symbol of the future realisation’. But the ears upon which those words fell were deaf, representing as they did (and do) the realistic conditions of the present which has been propelled into the new future – a leap it finds difficult to make because first it needs to disengage itself from the accumulation of distorted forms and names that the past has consolidated.

Therefore, what is the situation we are faced with in the episode of the Mother’s Temple, the only living example of objective art, and the element which can link the material planes with the Supramental? The past exerted its pull, its inertia, and succeeded in distorting those forms, thus carrying the structure that is coming up in India into the dimension of ‘man’s own image’ rather than the Divine’s. But the interesting aspect to this difficult labour has always been to observe how truth is ever present, even in those distortions. We have, for example, Italian architects in charge of the project in Auroville, – Florentines, to be even more precise. To these fell the task of overseeing and deciding what was to be built in the final analysis. I have always considered it extremely interesting that Italy, the centre of the Age of Pisces, should have been brought into that ‘cauldron’ wherein those old things are done away with and the ‘new brew’ is concocted, in this manner. This bears with the essential truth of the supramental yoga that the individual is extremely important in the process; but unlike former times in the West, his/her instrumentation is impersonal and represents a cosmic process and global conditions, rather than any personal furthering or importance. Needless to say, it is rare to find instruments conscious of this extended scope. Usually the consciousness is too closed in the confines of the personal and fails to appreciate this larger extension and collaboration.

Thus the key feature of the Florentine Renaissance, that extreme focus on Individualism, was carried into a central position in the question of the execution of this fundamental piece of objective art, going against what is held as most sacred in India: respect for the vision of the Seer. And that Renaissance consciousness is a great obstacle to the successful accomplishment of this type of execution, not to speak of its significance regarding the evolution of consciousness in the species and the egocentric poise that has to be superseded now.

These subtleties are not easily appreciated by the uninitiated. As I pointed out in the example of the Government of India and its efforts to foster and honour craftsmen and thereby encourage a renewal in the nation’s cultural and artistic traditions, when no clear-seeing is present these acts of goodwill can produce contrary results. In Auroville we have a perfect example of this situation insofar as there are no people of Knowledge guiding affairs. I refer to the fact that the Government of India was obliged to take over the project a number of years ago, because of the disputes over ownership and control that arose in the community in the course of its development. In this part of the discussion I will provide an example of the uselessness of goodwill when one is dealing with matters of higher vision and purpose.

The Government of India is ‘paranoid’, to use Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi’s own expression, about foreign missionaries and the corroding influence they have on the national culture and religious heritage. This is certainly a fact which any objective observer can affirm, and it is understandable that the Government should seek to tackle this problem and curb this influence in some way. This it has been doing, sometimes ‘paranoically’. But the Government, not being a body influenced by higher knowledge, as all governments throughout the world, can only act in this matter according to these limitations. Added to this, being ignorant of the real root cause of the decay, it often ends up by supporting those very elements it believes itself to be nobly combating for the good of the nation it serves.

Therefore, what is the position in Auroville? The Government is in control of the project, by a decision of the India Supreme Court. Under its benevolent aegis the city grows and the distorted temple under construction there comes up. And ironically that structure is consolidating on Indian soil the corrosive influences and forces that the Government believes it is successfully ridding the country of in its campaign against the infiltration of foreign elements which undermine the nation’s cultural heritage! Can there be any more serious undermining to that heritage than a ‘temple’ coming up with government patronage that strikes at the very roots of all that the Sanatana Dharma has held sacred throughout thousands of years? The elements in the human consciousness that resulted in an overpowering exaltation of the individual instrument and hence the exaltation of the human consciousness and seeing rather than the Divine’s, are what has been brought into India and given a preeminent place at the centre of Auroville.

But the Government, being a body that functions on the external strata, cannot appreciate this condition. And so, it fosters in one place what it condemns in another. The seeds of the Age of Pisces have been brought into India and given a secure position on its soil, and in astrological tradition the inferior aspect of that sign is self-undoing. Surely this is a prime example.

Let me quote an interesting portion from Reshad Feild’s book, The Last Barrier (Harper & Row, USA, 1976), in this context, when his Sufi teacher declares, ‘…what will come about will be like nothing that has even been seen before. I am speaking of a completely new way of life, and it is those with knowledge of Unity who must forge the way now. It is those people who can make decisions stemming from real knowledge and will breathe life and order into the New Age.’

However, all is not lost. Indeed, just the contrary. India is merely playing her role of “Mother of the Supramental Age’. For it was necessary to draw those elements into the nation at this centremost point, in order to deal with the root cause of the decay. At the same time and in conjunction with this, India establishes the new. Hence, while the construction continues in Auroville of the representative model of the dying past Age, the true Temple has been ‘built’, its Knowledge has been brought down and the process it fosters has carried the integral yoga into the dimensions of the supramental. The Sanatana Dharma has been renewed, revitalised, re-poised on fuller foundations, in accordance with the new cosmic harmonies.

What happens to the old in this case? It goes on, drawing its momentum from inertia, from the dead past. And it provides a choice to seekers: the old or the new.

At this point, let me refer to another related ‘symbol’ development, which also reveals that truth is indeed present even in the distortions of itself. For while at the centre of Auroville the Government of India fosters the rise of the disfigured temple, which perfectly symbolises that purposeless world that is dying and which arose out of the consciousness of Europe’s dark Age, what do we find in Pondicherry, at the centre of the ashram Sri Aurobindo and the Mother founded? There too we have a symbol, but not of the failed future; rather it is of the old creation. The focus of life in the Ashram is a tomb, – the Samadhi, as it is called, or the place where the bodies of both Sri Aurobindo and the Mother lie.

How can this be, one asks? It is simply that when the new Form was provided by the Mother in 1970 and this was rejected, the logical follow-up was the complete split between the Ashram and Auroville. And each one, in isolation of the other, consolidates at its centre a symbol of this failure to integrate and harmonise. The Indian factor has been largely equated with the Ashram, and the Western with Auroville. This too is accurately conveyed in the symbols central to each organisation. For the Indian impasse is clearly demonstrated by the fact that no new forms manifested in the Ashram to capture the living essence of the Supramental Truth that Sri Aurobindo and the Mother brought down on Indian soil. The Mother did indeed provide the new imagery with its truth-measure, thereby elevating the world of sacred and objective Form and Name to the truth-conscious plane. But this was not understood, and in the Ashram the weight of the past impeded any embracing of this radical newness. At that point the Ashram cut itself off from any meaningful involvement with the future of their work, and the symbol of this truncated process is the Samadhi.

We have then, relics of the old creation as the most important symbols of that institution. Though the idols of Hinduism capture by their measure and design the living forces of the Gods and Goddesses of the planes they bore relation to – something the western missionary could never appreciate and hence his constant harangue about ‘paganism’ – , the Ashram never graduated beyond and to a higher expression, to that ‘symbol of the future realisation’.

A ‘tomb’, no matter how venerable, sacred, meaningful for devotees, can never be the focal point or the key symbol of that future realisation in the Supramental Manifestation. Nolini Kanta Gupta, one of Sri Aurobindo’s closer disciples, who until his death in 1984 was the seniormost member of the Ashram and by far its most respected, perceived this when at the time of the Mother’s passing he gave out a statement to the effect that her body ‘belonged to the old creation’ and that ‘the new one would come’. This statement, which was meant to adorn the Samadhi where her body was laid to rest along with Sri Aurobindo’s, caused a tremendous uproar among ashramites at the time; and he was virtually obliged to withdraw it. Yet Nolini Kanta Gupta’s seeing was accurate.

In an ordinary ashram a situation of this nature would be natural: the Guru leaves his body and the tomb where the body is placed, or the urn containing his ashes, is thereafter venerated. If the Power has not been passed on to one of the surviving disciples, the locale becomes simply a holy place, frequented by pilgrims ever after. But in this case we are not dealing with an ashram in the traditional sense of the word. This was rather a centre, a sort of laboratory for the working out and the establishment of the spirit of the new Age, the Age of the Supermind. And in view of the unique and very special characteristics of Supermind, a development such as the one we find in Pondicherry becomes even more significant. The Divine Maya, or the Supreme’s fashioning Power in matter, is a central feature of the new Creation; and by consequence new symbols and forms are intrinsic parts of the manifestation. In addition, underlying the truth of Supermind is the principle of Immortality. Hence, the new Symbol and Forms which are capable of conveying this essential quality must accurately reflect that principle. It cannot be otherwise. A tomb, no matter how charged it may be with the Master’s force, is and always will remain a tomb. And this is fundamental to bear in mind in a work in which ‘the symbol is the thing symbolised’, to paraphrase Sri Aurobindo (see introductory quotation).

We can take Christianity as an example of the symbol being the thing symbolised. The major symbol of Christianity, worshipped by every one of its adherents and prominent in all its places of worship, is the cross bearing the crucified Jesus. Now, no matter how much we seek to philosophise the matter, it reveals that there is a symbol of Death central to all Christian worship. The theologians will explain that this was the way in which man’s sins were expiated, by the blood of God’s only begotten Son, and that the Resurrection is the real issue. But where is the symbol of that resurrection?  It certainly never became the focal symbol of that religion, comparable to the Cross. Rather, we are faced with the clear facts, just as in the Pondicherry Ashram: the central focus of worship displays, in terms of the symbol being the thing symbolised, that the work is incomplete; and demonstrating this is a symbol of the old creation, just as Nolini Kanta Gupta had described.

However, if the Mother had not completed her mission as the incarnate Formative Power of the Supreme and given out that Divine Maya or Measure, then the state prevailing in the Ashram would be legitimate. But she did complete her mission, and therefore it is an aberration. Not only did she give the new Symbol and Form, as well as lay the foundation for the new Name (the new language) just before her passing, she also specified that it was indeed the ‘symbol of the future realisation’. She has never said this about the Samadhi, to my knowledge, nor of anything else she left. In addition, she stated specifically that in the Chamber of the Future Realisation there should be no photographs of herself and Sri Aurobindo; only their symbols. Indeed, those symbols are the essential features of the new Language and the only elements of the past and that ‘old creation’ that are to be legitimately carried over and to form an integral and intrinsic part of the new Symbol-Word. Not a tomb, symbol of Death. Nor even their physical features which have now become so representative of the past forms. Rather, their symbols at the heart of the Temple provide us with the fundaments of the Supramental Gnosis. And the Core of the Chamber can be described in two ways: the symbol of the new Heaven and the new Earth, or the symbol of Immortality.

But of course, if one has no understanding of Symbols and the role they play in all higher knowledge, and particularly regarding the Supramental Manifestation where the question of Symbols has reached a perfection and an apotheosis never before attained, then it is impossible to appreciate what it is that the Mother meant by her injunctions. Indeed, all the developments connected with that ‘symbol of the future realisation’ are simply incomprehensible mysteries to the uninitiated. And lamentably, there is hardly a person involved with the Mother’s work in the Ashram or in Auroville who has even the remotest idea of these essential elements of the New Creation. Not only are they lacking any Knowledge in this area, but they combat vigorously anyone who might have this special insight.

What I have written you above is sure to vex the devotees and all the people who are pouring money and energy into the construction of the Matrimandir. But fortunately when one has attained the higher Seeing through the laborious travails of the Integral Yoga and crossed the threshold into the Supramental Yoga in this pioneering stage, it is clear that one has earned the right to make use of our much tooted ‘freedom of expression’. And since you seem to be sincerely seeking real insights into these matters, it has been entirely necessary to provide concrete examples of the statements I have made, without which we would still be in the realm of the theoretical and the abstract, features which have lined the path of Knowledge with many corpses in the course of history. ‘The symbol is the thing symbolised’, must be the aphorism to bear in mind in these matters. This is something the seeker all too easily forgets in his quest. Indeed, nowhere can it be better applied than in questions of higher knowledge and more especially in the realm of the supramental Gnosis which, I repeat, has drawn this aphorism to a peak of unparalleled refinement.

Therefore in Pondicherry, which is where the Master did his initial tapasya and broke through the many crusts in the atmosphere to allow the supramental Light to penetrate our world, we have as the focal symbol a womb/tomb of the Past. In astrological tradition this would be represented by the sign Cancer (the womb and the tomb), corresponding to Diti of the Vedic tradition. To illustrate this connection, let me draw your attention to the Puranic stories concerning Diti, as the sister of Aditi.

In one particular tale, both were married to Kasyapa, son of Daksha, and bore him a host of children. Aditi is reported to have given birth to the Gods, twelve in number, who became known as the Adityas, while Diti gave birth to the Asuras, the Titans. There is something very revealing in this story about the birth of those powers known as the Maruts, which were the helpers of Indra. This tale displays the important symbolism of Diti with regard to the ‘womb’ and the divisive aspect of her nature, for she is known as the Mother of Disunity, of Division.

To be brief, Indra came to know that Diti was carrying in her womb a son who when born would be capable of slaying him. To avoid this, by a ruse he entered her womb and therein cut the embryo to pieces, in stages of seven so as to make 49 in all. And these later became the Maruts, his helpers in the divine Labour.

In modern psychology, Diti would be the personality in contrast to the individuality; Prakriti (Mother Nature) in contrast to the Adya Shakti, the Supreme Mother. And regarding the tomb at the centre of the Ashram, the connection with Diti would also be indicated by the fact that there the Mother has become largely associated with a personal force and symbol of worship. The situation has reached such revealing proportions that in certain circles it has virtually become a sin to refer to her as the Mother, using the article. This is another indication of the personal tone that has been adopted and the loss of the vision of the Divine Maya, that Aditi of Vedic tradition. In a development of this nature, one would expect mature disciples to question first of all why it was that Sri Aurobindo always wrote of her as the Mother; and then, what it is that is compelling people to join this cult of ‘Mother’ that has now become so prominent.

Concerning this question of a ‘tomb’, I would like to bring this letter to a close by relating an interesting anecdote which can also provide another example of how truth is ever present, even in its distortion, provided one has ‘eyes with which to see’, and the will to do so. This episode occurred when I was living in the Ashram and holding classes in cosmic harmonies in the early 1970s. It so happened that during one of the courses it became necessary to demonstrate what exactly a horoscope was, because the students were ignorant of the actual mechanics of the System and how a horoscope evolves out of the cosmic harmony. Therefore I decided to select an item as an example that would be of some universal significance for all and draw up a chart for that event. I chose, therefore, the time the Mother gave for the work to begin on the Matrimandir. What developed in that class was extremely interesting in the light of what I have written above regarding tombs and wombs and symbols! I should also mention that at the time I was holding these classes, I had little or no connection with what was transpiring in Auroville around the Mother’s Temple. It was not until two years later that I discovered her original plan and realized that it had been changed by the architects.

To draw up any horoscope the exact time is required. This was provided by one of the students, a resident, if I recall, of Auroville. I drew up the chart, instructing the students in the method step by step. When the horoscope of the Matrimandir was complete, I proceeded to illustrate how traditional astrology ‘reads’ or interprets a chart. As I recall, the first item on the agenda was a discussion of the Ascendant, or the point of the zodiac on the eastern horizon which is determined by the exact hour and minute of an event. It is called the lagna in Sanskrit and sets the tone for the entire reading. But, to my astonishment, according to the traditional interpretation, the analysis of this item would indicate that the Matrimandir was a tomb! Perhaps to house ultimately the bodies of Sri Aurobindo and the Mother? What else?

I was rather shocked and I expressed this to the students. But from that point onward what happened provided a most interesting finale to this symbol-anecdote.

A person entered the room then who had actually been present at the ceremony for which we were drawing up a chart. He emphatically stated that the time provided by the student was wrong. It was incorrect by ten minutes (I believe). This was vivid in his memory because Nolini Kanta Gupta, who was presiding over the ceremony, had to improvise by reading certain passages from Sri Aurobindo’s writing in order to ‘kill time’, as the saying goes, so that the moment of inauguration would be exactly the one stipulated by the Mother. His improvised reading lasted for some time, and the ceremony was thus carried out according to her precise instructions as to the auspicious moment.

Of course I hastened to draw up the horoscope on the basis of the revised time, and this put the Ascendant and hence the ruling planet into a different section of the chart which bore an entirely different meaning. It cancelled the interpretation of a ‘tomb’. And this, I must add, is exactly what happened concerning the Mother’s original plan of that Temple.

This episode provided a forecast of the work I was later to be called upon to do, but of which in 1972 and 1973 I was still unaware. It involved rescuing the Mother’s vision and the new Symbol and Form from fossilization. Thus when I came upon the Mother’s original plan, prior to its alteration by the architects, I immediately discovered in it a womb of knowledge, of life, of living power. But for this, a respect for its exact measurements was demanded, as in the above episode a respect for the exact time was required in order to rescue the interpretation of the chart, and indeed to render it a faithful expression of her creative act. But there is more to the matter, and the incident was prophetic in a very essential area of the work that would soon begin but which at the time I ignored. It did concern Time, but in a very specific way.

The Mother’s contribution regarding the Temple was to give forth its space plan. This involved hence the Measure of 12, a fact which is made evident by her own symbol which consists of 4 inner petals and 12 outer. This, in effect, formed the basis of the Temple’s design.

My contribution centred entirely on the Temple’s time plan. The anecdote I have related was telling me what that future contribution was to be and warning me in the process that a respect for accuracy was needed. Indeed, had I not discovered the Mother’s original plan and seen only the altered version of the architects, I would never have been able to contribute that most essential time measure or plan; for it is only when the time plan comes into being that those measurements provide sense, meaning, knowledge, and they can then be ‘read’ like a book.

In due course of time I came to adopt a symbol for myself, following the realisations that allow for such an adoption, which is reproduced below. Beside it is the Mother’s of 12 petals. As you can see, mine consists of 3 inner petals and 9 outer. These two symbols represent the vertical-time dimension (9) and the horizontal-space (12), and their superimposition formed the valuable Gnostic Circle, the crucial key of Knowledge that made it possible to unravel the mysteries of that marvelous Temple of the New Age.


                                  Thea's Symbol, The Mother's Symbol

In The Life Divine Sri Aurobindo has written, ‘At present mankind is undergoing an evolutionary crisis in which is concealed a choice of its destiny’. What I find very interesting is that when his disciples or devotees or others connected with his work read a statement of this nature,  automatically they consider that this choice pertains to others, – that ‘big bad world out there’ and that it has no relation to them. Having ‘chosen’ Sri Aurobindo and the Mother, they consider themselves to be exempt from the very difficult labour of facing the responsibility that accompanies this critical choosing at this evolutionary turning point. In addition, experience showed me that there was never present in those circles any understanding of what the nature of that choice was, nor what it demanded of them.

I see the matter quite differently. To me it is more than evident that that ‘choice’ is first and foremost a responsibility of HIS OWN PEOPLE, so to speak. The onus lies primarily on them, and it has very little to do with having ‘accepted’ Sri Aurobindo and the Mother. That would be too easy. But wasn’t a choice present in the adoption of the Mother’s original plan for the Matrimandir rather than the architects’? Or concerning the ‘burning at the stake’ of The New Way in the Ashram?

Of course, if people and governments wish to continue pouring money and energy into a construction that further exalts the ego of the architect, the choice is entirely theirs. Or if devotees and disciples insist on focusing their attention on symbols of the old creation, the choice too is entirely theirs. For together with that much tooted ‘freedom of expression’ goes that other favourite: freedom of choice.

A Future in chaos is the condition that plagues Auroville because its choice resulted in the loss of a ‘centre that holds’. Imprisonment in the Past has been the result of the Ashram’s choice, where inertia impedes an embracing of the new Future. But while these two centres of Sri Aurobindo and the Mother’s work stand as symbols of a dying Past and an inchoate Future, a third arises which is the bridge, harmoniously joining the past and the future and integrating those time-energies for the formation of a new Cosmos, a new creation of the Supermind, within which ‘the symbol is the thing symbolised’ and central to which stands that superb Symbol of the Future Realisation.


Aeon Centre of Cosmology
Deepavali, November 1986

Discussions with Patrizia Norelli-Bachelet 15 June 1986, Stone Ridge, New York

Well now, your teachings. Could they have been taught in the Piscean Age?


Definitely not.


That’s right. The time is right.


Oh, absolutely. It would have been impossible. Out of that Age came what we have! And it is as clear as a bell that that is the way it had to be. No. It is only now…and remember, it is very interesting, this whole period, because if you’ve read The Gnostic Circle one of the key factors is the 9th Manifestation of Sagittarius. This is what most of these new age groups fail to appreciate, that, yes, it is the Aquarian Age, but we are in this larger arc of the 9th Manifestation. And that’s what answers a lot of the questions. Otherwise, just by looking at it in terms of Aquarius, you cannot understand what is happening. You cannot understand this total breakdown. But if you understand it in terms of the birth process: 9 months, 9 ages, 9 manifestations, and either you live or you die — but there is a new creation that comes out. It is very simple and very clear. Then you begin to understand why.

Just because it is the Aquarian Age doesn’t mean that we have to be going through this hell. And poised on the brink. You understand? Where the only solution is a new birth. The only solution is a new creation. There is no other, because we cannot find a solution based on any of the old pillars that we’ve clung to for so long.

So this is the big key. The Piscean Age, the Aquarian Age. Yes, this is important. It is clear: space travel. Before it was discovery of the Earth by sea; now it is into space. All this, the openings to new things…but the real key is this larger arc of six thousand and some odd years, which is this 9th Manifestation, which is the time of the Birth. And, you see, we are dealing with a long arc of time.


But this is the turning point.


Of course. In this very Age.


Are we going to make it?


Well, I have no doubt about it. But just because I have no doubt doesn’t mean that we don’t experience difficulties. Good Lord, just in my work, the difficulties…you cannot imagine. So, it is difficult, but as long as you can see what is going on, as long as you know, then somehow you have the strength from that; and you go on.

You can imagine. This being a new work, the difficulties that it faces are tremendous. You have to literally open a path…and what are you opening? You are opening through a…


A jungle!


So, it is not easy at all.


If I understand it, it is not a question of will we make it, because the fact that you have written and given us that message, is a sign that we have made it.


Well, this is the way I feel about it. That you would not be able to formulate things like this if it was not already done, let’s say, and manifested in time in certain levels. Of course. That’s the whole point. So, that’s why I can sit here and laugh about it.


On the mental plane, it exists. The battle is bringing it down into the physical, before the planet is destroyed.


Yes, of course. It is like two things are joining, a new heaven and a new earth. You see, so they have to reach the same point. This is what is happening now. But what she says is absolutely right. And that is what I felt: that it would be impossible to even formulate…you see, I always talk about this work in terms of a language, which is the formulation of a new synthetic language. And people don’t perhaps realise what that means. It means that you could not create this language if all the elements were not there to make it possible. And those, being there already, means that that creation exists, in seed form. It must grow and overtake the other.

You know, when you look at it in these long cycles, then it is immaterial. Because, as I say, if you see it in the moment, this is your greatest joy — because you realise that you are participating. Even if you’re not connected consciously with a work like this, you just bear in mind that you are living in the times when this magnificent thing is being decided and is getting done.

So, whatever…somewhere in your being It knows that, or you would not have taken birth now, you see?


Is there something unique about this planet? In terms of a mission in the universe, or a function?


Well, I feel that way. I feel that way very strongly, because it all has to do with the soul, what is the nature of the soul. That being so utterly wonderful, this question of the soul, what it is…well, definitely in this solar system that is the contribution of the Earth. Whether in another solar system the same process exists…. It may. But it would be still different. And then there is a beauty here, a certain combination that has come together: its position in the solar system.

When you think about it, the immense combination of circumstances that had to come about in order to allow for such a manifestation. It boggles the mind. And that makes it very unique. Very unique. So, for me it is a grace to be born on this planet. In matter…just to take birth, for me is a grace. Quite the contrary to what people think, that it is a hell. It is only here that you can become conscious, that you live the experience consciously, and the process to evolve and understand that evolution, and enjoy the whole process. On other planes you cannot. You don’t evolve. There are planes where there may be perceptions that are even, let’s say, closer to the Divine. But there they do not evolve. And then when you go even higher, you obliterate the capacity. You see? And this is what is so unique that takes place in a body. And that is what the ego is all about. It serves its purpose; it provides you with a separate instrument of perception; but at the same time then you have to surpass the ego.

There is an aphorism of Sri Aurobindo: ‘The ego was the helper, the ego is the bar.’ That’s the point. It allows you to evolve this instrument that grants you the capacity to have this conscious experience of the Divine, this evolution. And at the same time, of course, you have to surpass it at a certain point, if you really want to attain the new consciousness.

So for me it is completely the opposite. So completely that, I tell you, it gets to be a problem now, because everything is just so old. You know, I look at all of this and I say: It’s just so OLD. How can they presume that that is going to be the solution. You know, it is something for me that is like coming out of the Dark Ages. Whereas the other is so simple. So clear. So new. Because it is a new manifestation. We have had it in seed form. But we have not consciously lived it yet. And this is what we are doing in this Manifestation.


I haven’t read The New Way, but does it then obliterate what I have understood every religion is, the ancient wisdom which has been passed down through, I don’t know, small circles? So, The New Way just obliterates the ancient teachings?


I don’t think so. I think rather it’s just simply carrying all that forward into this new thing, because I often refer to certain teachings — myths, especially, where you really have very profound truths. Because in these myths you always are dealing with the soul of the Earth, the soul of the species.

No, I wouldn’t say that it obliterates them, but I would say that it certainly does make a lot of sense out of what all these things were for. Why they did manifest. But at the same time, it is giving you the New Way. It is saying: That is what it was all about up until that point. Now we are dealing with something new. But this has evolved from that. And you cannot disconnect it from its past also.

It’s like the birth of a child. While it is a foetus it is one thing. But when it is born, it is a new thing. And it’s a thing on its own. Complete in itself. Any woman can understand that. Your experience of it in the womb is one thing, and this is exactly what we have known as a civilisation: we are a civilisation as yet unborn. And it is very clear…but of course it will be much clearer once we have gone through this period. But the important thing is to see it while it is happening, because the process of birth is so exciting. All the conditions that are forcing this Birth.


I think the question that I asked earlier was, will this new consciousness be able to come to our planet? Or will the planet be destroyed before that can take place? And if the planet really is destroyed, does it really matter?


Definitely it does matter. This is a very interesting question, because it comes up all the time, in the sense that even in the work in terms of this microcosmic element that I am dealing with, for example, there were crucial points in this process where you said, ‘Well, one has got to overtake the other at some point.’ As a matter of fact, I just briefly referred to a certain work that I was doing in India in 1983 and 1984…and there, as a matter of fact, this whole point was really at stake. Well, what is going to emerge? Is one thing going to overtake the other? And I can happily say that, in terms of the modest yoga that was being performed individually and collectively, we got through that period and something really very fantastic did happen, which was the big breakthrough. In other words, now, that new consciousness overtakes the other, and the danger, I feel, is passed entirely. In fact, that is the only reason why I am here today. It is because it did succeed, otherwise it would have been useless and irrelevant to go anywhere and open my mouth about anything.


Is there any way we can make a dent in the minds of our world leaders?


I think that is again irrelevant [laughter]. In the sense that…I mean, they are just going to be carried along by a process, and what seems to be the way is that those things will go on, the old forms will continue like this.

Now, what I was telling you about just briefly was something on the seed level. A breakthrough occurred on the seed level. And this is the most important thing, because if it doesn’t occur there, it doesn’t occur anywhere else. I could go into this in very great detail, but now is not the time, and I don’t know if it ever will be in this type of…. It concerns a very intense collective process that went on. But it can be described very accurately.

All of the other things are simply ‘influenced’ then, they are carried along in the process, and they go on and on and on. I can tell you, for example, when you are dealing with individuals — you asked this before. You said this; that we are serving even though we are not perfect. This is what you mentioned before… It is the same condition, where a person is used as an instrument. Let’s say Ronald Reagan, — and he is totally unconscious of what he is doing. But he is used to create a lot of tension in the world — the arms build up, and all of that. The moment he came in power I said, ‘This is it: this man is there to create this particular tension.’ And he is doing it beautifully. Now, he can be unconscious, or at a certain point he can have a choice where he can do his role consciously, which of course would change his role entirely. But those people generally remain unconscious instruments.

But you take people, for example, who are involved in this microcosmic element, that are people who are working on themselves and they are really offering themselves. They get bogged down in their difficulties so they don’t see their instrumentation; and they suffer from that. Now these people, they are used also. They are instruments in this. But there comes a point where they are no longer needed because that work is done.

Take what happened in the work we were doing. Those people served the purpose at that time. Now, after that, it becomes a personal choice. Up until that point they are helpless; they are made to serve that function, like Reagan is in the White House, like Gorbachev over there, like this one and that one. But after that work is done, they are really no longer needed in that sense, and then it becomes a totally personal choice. Then they fall back into a sort of individual instrument where they can choose to continue that way, or they can fall off completely and they are not taken up again.

So, that’s the whole point. You see, it is virtually impossible that Ronald Reagan is going to open up to the new way! I mean it would never…it is simply not in his ‘style’, his role.

I have had certain things to do with so-called politicians in India because they were involved. That was something entirely different though. And those people were rather conscious of what they were doing. And of course it was India also: you can talk to anybody about these things, no matter who. The Prime Minister, the President and on downward. They listen and they understand, and deep inside they know that that is where the solution lies. They know it because it is in their tradition. The Brahmin was the highest caste and he had spiritual knowledge and he was above the king, and he advised the king.

So, we start from a different level which is nonexistent here in the United States, for example. When you go into this thing about influencing:  Yes, influence. But you have to influence indirectly, I think in this case. And that is by working on processes where the work is really done; and these people are simply carried along. In other words, it is important to get on with the work.


There are groups that pray that the minds of world leaders will be opened.


Have they been opened? I believe we are going to get into another delicate subject, about prayers like that, and all. Well, everybody has to do what they feel is right, but usually…you see, if these things are not done with knowledge, real knowledge, then they make them feel good, the ones who are praying; that is positive in itself. But actually changing…?


Is that a manifestation of ego, that we think we can change things?


Well, also. But also there are a lot of people who are sincere and they really want to do something, but they don’t know. They have no knowledge…


I wanted to ask you, in terms of being an unconscious instrument and getting on with the work, do you think that many people do work while they sleep? Or do you have to be in your body?


Yes, they do. This is a fact. I find it a very important part of the work, in dreams, conscious dreaming, coming out of the body, and all these things. But these again are stages that one reaches by work on oneself, by having that knowledge to deal with these things. But the sleep element is very important. Far more important than what many yogas consider. Let’s face it; we spend an awful lot of time sleeping, so if you’re unconscious when you’re awake, you will be equally unconscious when you sleep. We have gone into that, PH and I, about conscious dreaming and what it is all about. I mean, coming into a dream state consciously. This is quite different, — very different, your experience of it. But it is no different than you experience in life, it’s no different than that. You can be caught in the outer whirlwind of life in the waking state, and the same in dreams. In dream you can stand as a witness and everything revolves around you, if you are poised and conscious in life, you see? In the waking state. Then when you go into the dream state, you can go into it in the same condition and your dreams will become entirely different. They are more objective, and they influence — because in dreams of course you are touching very deep levels of the unconscious and the subconscious.

In this yoga, for example, there are stages where your dream work is very important. And generally it is important. You may keep a record of your dreams, the dates when they occur, and like that. As you would do in psychotherapy.


When you said, ‘This yoga’, is ‘yoga’ just a synonym for ‘work’?


In the way I am using it now, yes, of course. I use that term interchangeably; I am usually referring to Sri Aurobindo’s integral yoga, but with something else now which is the Supramental Yoga that he was alluding to, really, because he never really described it. So, that is the different phase that we are coming into now. When I say ‘the work’, I mean work on oneself within the framework of this particular discipline.


What would you suggest for people who haven’t read your work? Where would one start?


I always say The Magical Carousel, because I think that is so easy. It’s like cosmology without tears! But nobody else seems to realise that! They always seem to go to The Gnostic Circle. To me it seems so easy. Everything is there, in that little story, with the Commentaries especially. But most people like The Gnostic Circle. It really depends also on the type of person. I personally think The New Way can be read even first. That is because of the way it is written.


That’s your latest.


Another thing is the Newsletter that’s coming out now. This, I have to say, is a very exciting development, because…it came out not because it was a mental decision: ‘Well, now we’re going to print a newsletter!’ But because we had made that transition, and then came the time to start contacting people and creating a certain ‘web’ around the world, with people connected in the process. So that was the purpose of the Newsletter.

The Newsletter is giving out immediate…I mean, every two months it is coming out, and I am writing things on the immediate yoga. What is being done. So there is a process at work there. Of course, people, they read it, they may not realise this in the beginning; but later on, after the first few, you will see what an impact that will make.

That’s another thing. That has carried it [the work] now to another, very immediate stage, because it is possible now to contact people, after a certain nucleus is solidly there. And draw them into the process.

So there are various things. I think you have to just let yourself be guided in that, and what you feel. It is very difficult to be dogmatic on that: start with this, start with that. I think you have to make the selection yourself. Maybe have the books with you so that you can, at a given moment; and maybe in your conversations, if you refer to things, then you gradually get into it.


I picked up The Hidden Manna early, and simply couldn’t read it, it was so overwhelming. But now a year later I am reading it. It’s interesting. I had all the books at home, and some of them, like that, I couldn’t go to. It wasn’t the right time. And then I picked it up recently…


But, you see, you can probably understand why in your particular case that was so. Because of your Catholic background.


That’s right. I had to work through some emotional thing, about letting go of St. John and the Revelation.


And being ready to understand it in a different…and not afraid of it! That you are going to be pulled back into it again? If you feel that, you must follow your feelings. You must always follow your inner promptings, even if it is a negative manifestation. As long as you are sincere, as long as you really want THAT, you know, you will find your way. That is why you have to be very careful: no dogmas, no mental formulas.


I think it is like a new language, and if one is willing to take it up and not try to dissect every word, but let it really seep inside, and get the deeper meaning; that is the important thing about your work. It is affecting all the levels, and not to worry if you don’t understand the language. Don’t worry about it, not understanding the language. Because then you come back a year later, and you absolutely know the language.


That’s true, and why? Because I said it is really…if you could label it anything, it is an applied cosmology, an applied ‘language’. So that language doesn’t exist for you unless it is applied. Not applied mentally. Not that you sit there with the Gnostic Circle and you say, ‘Today, we are at this point, this and this is going to happen, this is what I must do.’ That’s not the point. The circumstances of your life must bring that alive. In other words, you are going to see the Divine in every circumstance of your life, and you grow then into that Consciousness. The Gnostic Circle is a blueprint of a “consciousness” which you are growing into. You are becoming That. And the Gnostic Circle is like the ‘ABC’. I have always said this; it is the ABC of this work, of this cosmology, and The New Way was making the sentences with it, creating, writing the whole book based on this. So, essentially one should be, or could be, read before the other, but not necessarily.


I tried to start with The Magical Carousel, but I really didn’t understand it; and as I read it, I knew I was going to have to have the whole thing explained to me. So it didn’t seem worthwhile to continue. I went on to The Gnostic Circle, which I really liked very much, much better. I haven’t finished it yet, it is slow going, but it has a lot of rich things in it for me, and 1 really…I wanted to ask you, do you sense yourself evolving? Do you sense the evolution occurring?


In myself?


Yes.


Well, what I sense is: hewing the path. And that is a process that is evolving. Of course. Very much so. And in all my books that ‘growth’ is there. The Magical Carousel was the first one, that was the ‘seed’, you know, mythic; and all that was there. And then they have all evolved out of that. Certainly there is a growth. But I must say that I started…well, can I say…the total vision was there, and then just different aspects of it came up. But, you see, for me that was the most important part. Because I remember in 1972, I was in the Ashram [in Pondicherry], and I had this overwhelming experience which in India is called the Brahman Consciousness, when you go into That. Of course it was something magnificent. It lasted for a number of days…in that state, which in other yogas is the height. You attain that and that’s it. Well, for me, at that time, I said, ‘Well, this is It.’ I didn’t even formulate it to myself like that. But I was in that state where it seemed to me that that was the totality. Because it was everything. The Fullness. It was no ‘void’, at all.

But, fortunately, as luck would have it, the Mother was there, and she just kept pushing me on; of course, without any resistance on my part, because I am made that way. And the beauty of it was what evolved out of that; and later on I realised that that was really just a ‘seed’. So, this ‘growth’…but it has come from that, and then just develops like a flower, on and on and on and on and on. So the growth is there.


What I meant was more like when you refer to the Divine jelling in the material. That’s what I meant, in terms of the evolution. Because some of the people have been talking about evolving to another level.


But, in what sense? Were you asking this personally?


Yes. Do you experience that? Do you experience that, the way…


I don’t think I have got the question. Which probably means I haven’t done it! [Laughter]


…the Spiritual, not manifesting on a higher plane but on a physical plane. That kind of thing.


Oh yes, definitely, that has taken place. I mean, that is the Consciousness. Period. That is the reason why I find myself at odds completely with everything else that is going on now, because this direction is so totally different. You see? I would have no work, I would be ‘jobless’!


Yes, that notion is what really struck me in your work. I think that, to me, was the central point.


I have to say…perhaps this will clarify too, that I never write anything on the basis of speculation. Every line has been a direct experience. Because I don’t write unless that has come. It is the ‘yoga’ that is performed, the experience that comes. And then out of that…it just so happens that it took the form of writing, because that is the medium today. We can communicate like that. But nothing is written that has not been experienced. Even in seed form. It may not be the full aspect of it, but the seed, which is enough for me to see the development of that particular process that I may be discussing. So every single thing has been a lived experience; and I think that that does come across in the books. I know that in a certain sense that is what may disturb people too. Someone who is writing from a lived experience and is not quoting this one or that one, and the endless bibliographies, and they feel a little bit at sea. They don’t know.


This concludes our transcript of
15 June 1986 Talks with Patrizia Norelli-Bachelet

On “Beelzebub’s Tales”, or the question of Objective Art

I have started reading Orage’s commentaries on Beelzebub’s Tales* which you have sent me. And right at the beginning he makes several points which I have to discuss. These are the very points that summarise largely my impressions of Gurdjieff’s teachings, especially certain flaws.

On page 126, Orage makes this statement:

‘The book [Beelzebub’s Tales] is an objective work of art. Objective art consists of conscious variations from the original according to the plan of the artist or writer who strives to create a definite impression on his audience.’

Now this, to me, is a remarkable statement. It reveals in no uncertain terms just how little Gurdjieff and his pupils understood about objective art. But there is more. This exposes one of the main flaws of his work, especially evidenced in his writing phase. It is the question of deliberate ‘manipulation’. Every person I have ever known who has been a serious student of Mr. G’s teachings perpetuates this failing, passed on to him/her by Gurdjieff himself, and nowhere more clearly demonstrated than in his writings. But it colours his whole teaching, its method, and the results, having to do with a certain key feature of his work: the creation of will.

I am not going to write abstractedly on this, for as you are aware this is not my way. In order to bring the points across that I wish to make on this subject, I am going to indicate exactly where you can find a living example of objective art, so as to fully substantiate what I write. But first, let me go into Orage’s definition.

A work of objective art is NEVER a conscious process in the sense that is implied in Orage’s statement.  Consciousness is not at all what he means here. Rather, it is willful manipulation to achieve a particular result. This sort of manipulation exudes from all of Mr. G’s books. Objective art, on the other hand, arises out of a condition of being; and to this we must add that one does not ‘strive’ to achieve anything in this superior art form. But Gurdjieff more than anyone should have understood that. And perhaps he did. But the moving thing is that he desired throughout his whole life to leave humanity with a sample of objective art because he was so aware of its importance as a vehicle for ‘spreading the Word’.

But to ‘spread the Word’ (and I don’t mean Christian proselytising) one has to have the Word. Mr. G had fragments. Remember the sub-title of In Search of the Miraculous?  It is, ‘Fragments of an Unknown Teaching’. In that book, Ouspensky presents Gurdjieff’s teachings. And indeed ‘fragments’ they were and ‘fragments’ they continue to be. On the basis of fragments plucked here and there, from one system and another, one place and another, one cannot produce a piece of objective art, ― be this a statue, a song, a poem, a piece of architecture, a book, or whatever of the numerous art forms. Any of these can be OBJECTIVE, provided that certain conditions are fulfilled.

Foremost there has to be an intrinsic, essential harmony between essence (to use Mr. G’s terminology) and form. It is not at all sufficient to have a right insight or even a profound grasp of truth based on certain realisations. For objective art to come into being, one must have the key to the truth of Form. This Mr. G never had, and it is so evident. How can anyone miss the point? Beelzebub’s Tales is simply Gurdjieff’s laborious attempt to find that Form, that key. Hence to consider the book an objective piece of art is to deceive oneself, and others.

You understand, the moment you bring in the question of Art, you are immediately in the realm of Form; and consequently to evaluate a piece that proposes to be this higher experience, it is required that we consider concurrently not only its content but its Form. The two go hand in hand, as I will demonstrate anon. This pertains to the written word as well as the more materially structured forms of art. Take poetry. Sri Aurobindo was experimenting with various ‘forms’ in order that one could be found, or more, which would be the proper vehicle for inspirations from the planes of the Truth-Consciousness. But the time had not yet come for that revelation in full, because the link had not yet been made between certain planes that allow for that perfection of Form to materialise. That is, the yogic process had not been completed which would permit an example of objective art to come forth.

In Gurdjieff’s time (he was Sri Aurobindo’s contemporary), the same limitation prevailed. But Sri Aurobindo was poised in the right ‘line’ for this work, and hence he contributed accurately and dynamically to the future manifestation of that objective Truth-Form. He did nothing to hinder that process, of which he was a direct part. Whereas Gurdjieff was only a peripheral agent.

Gurdjieff’s case is immensely interesting. He ‘saw’ so much, intuited the role of certain essential elements which indeed did enter into the process at a later date. And in this sense he contributed to this manifestation. But he never had the WHOLE, notwithstanding Orage’s assessment that he did. This was not the case. Mr. G started with ‘fragments’ and ended with ‘fragments’. Beelzebub’s Tales is a laboured attempt to find a way to that Wholeness, as his last effort on this planet, in that body.

And this brings me to another point. For a real manifestation of objective art, not only must there be a harmony between essence and form, but the interesting feature is a marvellous coming together of right essence, right form, and right INSTRUMENT. The instrument through which the creation is passing must be perfectly suited to the process, fashioned to provide the right channel which will not distort that essence and that higher form, since this is precisely what qualifies a work to be objective art. If you consider Gurdjieff to have been such an instrument, you are mistaken, and I shall indicate why. The instrument he was provided with was inadequate for the task undertaken; and the choice of the medium further revealed this inadequacy, insofar as it was not a medium through which Gurdjieff could present the world with an objective art form. That he did not see this, tells us much. But I believe he was aware of this in the beginning, hence his efforts to secure good instruments whom he could inspire to present his teachings to the world through the written word, which was the most powerful channel available at the time, and perhaps continues to be so. Ouspensky was one of those instruments, and his In Search of the Miraculous continues to be a classic in this branch of literature, regardless what we might think of Ouspensky’s contribution in other spheres.

But what do we find in Gurdjieff himself as the instrument for the written word? We have a jumble of languages in his head, given his background and the part of the world he was born in and had his early conditioning; none of which were the right ones for transmission of a message to the world at large in a direct, wide manner, not dependent upon intermediaries. In the case in question, perforce intermediaries played essential roles, given his limitations in this regard. Orage indicates this when he seeks to justify the final form Beelzebub’s Tales took:

‘Some of you still criticise the faulty grammar and punctuation and ask why I do not do something about it. Well, although from the first writing the sense is in each chapter, Gurdjieff is constantly rewriting and revising. As you know, he writes in pencil in Armenian; this is translated into Russian, and then into literal English by Russians; it is then gone over by one or two of the English and American pupils at the Prieure who have only a rough knowledge of the use of the words. All I can do at present is to revise the English when it obscures the sense. Although I have talked over the chapters with Gurdjieff and discussed the sense of them, he will never explain the meaning of anything. The style and sense are Gurdjieff’s. The surprising thing is that, in spite of the difficulties of translation the sense and style come through so well. It can be said that in English, this being a more flexible language than French, it is possible to play with words so that the English translation will have a quality of its own.’ (pp. 125-26)

This justification is a futile exercise, and lamentably people are cajoled to believe that since we are dealing with ‘higher’ truths, we cannot apply to them the ordinary yardsticks that would reveal the flaws in the form that Mr. G’s efforts produced. Orage and others are simply seeking to cover up those flaws of the instrument that Gurdjieff was provided at birth. It may well be that they never really had adequate answers to explain this evident failing.

And why was this so? Why was Gurdjieff not born into a body and an environment that would provide him with the vehicle he would need to accomplish his task? I believe the answer lies in the fact that he did not have a clear understanding of the exact role he was to play in the evolution of consciousness on Earth, in particular within the context of world conditions; and also in the fact that he did not have the key to Time, which in itself would have helped him to know his role.

Therefore, how could an objective piece of art come through an instrument so terribly limited by the conditions of birth playing upon his knowledge and use of language, which would be the tool for his creation? He first wrote in Armenian, and then followed the laborious process of carrying his thoughts over into some type of adequate form that could be the ‘vehicle’ for the message in a global capacity, for a larger audience. It is clear that Armenian would not do, and I wonder whether the original Armenian even exists. But still there is more, it is the question of the style chosen, and this I shall discuss anon.

You cannot seriously believe that this is the way a piece of objective art comes into the world. Don’t you see that this very fact indicates that there is no element of objective art present in the creation, where Form is so hopelessly conditioned by the inadequacies of birth and conditioning? Indeed, there is a further point to make: objective art is wholeness, completeness, unity of form. With such a torturous, laborious creative process, how can any wholeness emerge? And it hasn’t. But I feel that people like yourself are carried into the belief that Beelzebub’s Tales is objective art simply because you cannot recognise the real thing when it is presented, having never been exposed to this type of creativity. But to hide these flaws, Gurdjieff, it seems, manipulates. His conscious will interferes with the process constantly, and finally he ends by purposely obscuring the text, using, as you call it, ‘difficult terminology’. This, we are exhorted to believe, is the correct way to convey objective truth.

This brings me at this point to a very important part of the discussion. It is Name and Form, and the link between the two, as evidenced in almost all ancient and new traditions of higher knowledge. We even find it in Genesis. But perhaps nowhere has the place of these dual aspects been given more prominence than in Hinduism. In ancient Vedic times they were given a position of preeminence, but later the central stage became occupied almost exclusively by the Nameless and the Formless. Be this as it may, the point I wish to make is the relatedness of these two aspects of creation. Where Form comes into being, simultaneously Name arises. These are aspects of the multiplicity. Regarding Gurdjieff’s work, this relatedness manifests most coherently. He purposely makes his texts obscure and refuses ‘to explain’ anything, as Orage points out. This same condition is logically carried over to the ‘names’ he chooses throughout Beelzebub’s Tales, impossible to pronounce for the most part. It seems that obliging the student to memorise those impossible names in his terminology, would somehow keep attention awake and perhaps make the knowledge so hard won, one’s own! But in my view, this is simply a further distraction from the real work, where real effort should be focused. Transformation of the nature is difficult enough without introducing this added complication. This may well be Gurdjieff’s personal teaching technique — but what has this to do with objective art with its harmony of form and essence and hence Name? This is simply the way to obscure further what little truth there may be, in addition to distracting the seeker and focusing attention deliberately on questions of little relevance. Instead of introducing the true ‘name’ of things, the result is merely more cacophony. Does the world need this?

In any true objective piece of art (and I shall soon provide an example), the form and name never obscure the message — which implies a distortion in the dimension of form in order to carry out this obscuring process. How can it, please be logical? But one throws first and foremost all discrimination and logic to the winds, and then believes oneself to be in tune with something ‘higher’. Anything ‘higher’ will never contradict true logic and good sense. Admittedly, the qualifying word here is ‘true’. There is not much true logic and good sense around these days, particularly evidenced in these matters.

In actual fact, one does not require anything higher than the ordinary mental faculties the human being is provided with to realise that we are dealing with contrived manipulation and willful obscuring, which help to cover up certain basic flaws in the teaching. Or the ‘gaps’ in the knowledge, as I have called them. And we are encouraged to believe, by Gurdjieff and his disciples, that this is the way Truth is best transmitted. Yes, there is a ‘secret language’, but this is something else. It is an initiatic language but one that also uses a perfection of form, though this may be unknown to the person who is not initiated. However, in this case we are dealing with a deliberately chosen ‘style’ by Mr. G. And that is the objection I have, when this style is purported to be a means for creating objective art. It is simply Gurdjieff’s private style, his idea that this is the best way to teach. But it has nothing to do with objective art.

I am faced with this question of logic and coherency all the time in my work. And unlike Gurdjieff and most others, I encourage people to use ALL their faculties in their approach to my work and its assessment. I find that these enhance the experience and add to its richness. But the point is to attain the right poise whereby these faculties are honed to a perfection rarely achieved; and this of course requires that they be influenced by a higher light and wisdom. Deliberately obscuring a message and consciously adopting a style that does so, can never lead to this enhanced poise. It simply makes the existing chaos and confusion more chaotic and confounding!

Hence, if one pretends to convey truth objectively, then the medium of expression, the style and the resultant form must be a faithful, living expression of that truth-essence. There cannot be any gaps along the way, any distortions, any manipulative obscurations and interferences from the vital and mental will and the lower planes of consciousness. This has always been the case in the past, and it remains so today.

Gurdjieff was under the impression that truth had to be obscured in order to drive people to make super efforts to attain it. This coloured the thinking of many groups that believed themselves to be channels of higher knowledge during his time. There was a certain romanticism attached to the matter, a desire to be mysterious, esoteric, an elite. But this again displays a lack of real understanding of the human instrument. We have all been witness to the fact — and certainly Gurdjieff was — that simple, clear, direct expressions of truth are AUTOMATICALLY veiled to the inner consciousness of a seeker who is not ready to receive the Word. There is no need at all to increase the veiling, because this condition already exists in the ‘eye of the beholder’. What then would be the Point? Why add to this condition of ignorance? Indeed, this is one of the major problems in our civilisation: forms are not connected to the inner truth; they are DE-formed and hence add to the spread of ignorance throughout the world. The same can be said of ‘names’.

Let me provide now an example of objective art; and fortunately we do not have to turn to remote history to find one, and thereby indulge in those orgies of speculation that seem to delight the masculine mind, — yours in particular! The only existent objective piece of art that I know of today is the Mother’s original plan of the Matrimandir. As you know, what is being built in Auroville bears no relation to that original; and indeed, it provides us with an example of interference and manipulation, when lesser minds pretend to be in a position to ‘improve’ upon that truth-form.

The Mother’s original plan is objective art. It conforms to all the prerequisites — the true ones, not Orage’s definition, some of which I have already discussed. In drawing your attention to this piece, I am also going to illustrate how indeed a special ‘language’ evolved in order to be able to convey limpidly and accurately the essence of the creation. There was certainly no attempt to render the message difficult to perceive and grasp. Just the contrary. The new language evolved in order to provide the seeker with the correct and enhancing element by which he/she could understand, could have an experience of the truth-consciousness in its phase of actualisation today.

One of the main aspects in the Mother’s creative act is that there were no flaws along the way, no interferences, contrived manipulations on her part. Moreover, the Mother at no point indulged in any so-called conscious act of creation, — read studied and contrived. As you can see, this makes her creation totally different from Gurdjieff’s, or even Sri Aurobindo’s for that matter, but for a different reason. In those early years of their yoga, the links had not been made with those formative planes bearing upon the physical; and hence the ease with which the Mother undertook the creative act was something rather special and a landmark in this work. Out of BEING the Temple was created. That is, it arose from the Mother’s consciousness-being in a spontaneous act of creation, as a result of her yoga successfully completed, a yoga which had to do precisely with the physical, with ‘form’. Had she not done this first and come out victoriously, she could never have presented the world with this splendid example of objective art. But it is more than this. It is truly a ‘new model of the universe’, another item Gurdjieff was in quest of.

I would like to take up the question of FORM in relation to this creation. In the original plan she gave us, we have an exquisitely simple form; and above all a unity of design, from which no item can be eliminated otherwise the creation’s ‘wholeness’ is marred. In this particular sample of art, there are no elaborate artifices. Forms are pure, clear, even transparent. But an extraordinary ‘richness’ does enter the creation. This richness, abundance, exuberant fullness is found in the content. This is what is ‘concealed’ in those simple, limpid forms. That is what the seeker has to make an effort to discover. But the structure itself does not create difficulties for the seeker and harden his/her task. Just the contrary. Objective art creates an ‘atmosphere’ in which the seeker is almost automatically carried into the dimension of truth, from where that creation has emerged. This indeed is its purpose. In Beelzebub’s Tales there is nothing of the sort.

Even in the right atmosphere for such a discovery, it is still an immensely difficult task. Why complicate the issue and make it even more difficult by willful, contrived style and terminology, as a pretext to goad the aspirant to ferret out the truth camouflaged behind this distortion? In fact, if the form itself is distorted, how can the seeker hope to come upon real truth-essence? Objective pieces of art are aids to seekers precisely because they help to focus the unfocused ‘lens of their seeing’ by presenting a FOCUSED OBJECT, outstanding among all other objects of our world by this very fact. Now, if you distort those forms, as Gurdjieff does, convincing yourself and others that this is the way to ‘help’ seekers find the truth, you are either a fool or a hostile force bent upon interfering with the descent of real Knowledge which can help to create a better world. This is certainly what abounds today….

What actually happens in an act of creation like the Mother’s? The object is not distorted in the process of finding its ‘body’ in this material world. (Isn’t it obvious that a feminine instrument is best suited to this function?) In the Mother’s creative, formative act, truth-conscious planes are reached. Her Temple ‘exists’ in that plane. That is, its essence, its supramental content exists therein. The yoga the Mother performed so concentratedly for the last twenty years of her life was precisely to forge the link with those more subtle planes and our material universe, in cosmic dimensions. This was her ‘yoga of the body’, that has so befuddled people and given rise to so much speculation. When this was completed, out of that resultant condition of being, the Temple was ‘created’, or rather MANIFESTED through her consciousness in a spontaneous outpouring that was itself the signal that she had completed her task victoriously.

Having an instrument that harmonised perfectly with this Condition of Being, a prepared, perfected channel through which this creation could emerge, we find that there was no interference along the way; and above all no contrivances to conceal flaws in the seeing and essential content. Indeed, this was her lament when the architects came upon the scene to execute the plan and proceeded immediately to alter all its details. Distortions were then introduced in the original by them and marred the perfection of form that her consciousness had given birth to. Let me quote her final attempt to get those architects to collaborate:

‘…For the construction I know very well that people are needed who know their job and who do the work, but for the inspiration I must be sure that the source of inspiration must be AT LEAST the same level as mine. And I am not sure, because I saw it so clearly. And suddenly, with P’s ideas [the architect] I see the mixture. His ideas are all mental, I can guarantee that because it is easy for me to see it. Well, they bring the same MIXTURE there is in everything that is done in the world. And that…what is the use in having to begin over again, again, again, again…?’ 

L’Agenda de Mere, Volume 11, Institut de Recherches Evolutives, Paris (1981)

From this quote you can appreciate that there is no need at all to distort and obscure truth. The human being handles that beautifully!

Thus we have in the Mother a condition of Being out of which spontaneous creation arises (How else was the universe created?). And then you have a perfection of Form that accurately expresses the truth-consciousness upholding that Form. Indeed, Form then becomes the most precious instrument of Truth.

The result of the Mother’s creative act is that we have on Earth today an example of objective art and its process of creation that draws into the physical the truth of the supramental planes of consciousness. At no time along the way did the Mother seek to obscure that essence, make it difficult for seekers to fathom, to penetrate its mysteries. These are the mental interferences she refers to, and the manipulations of the vital will. They are techniques resorted to when one has not truth-conscious Being, out of which real Knowledge and Power issue forth. The Mother was THAT, and her Temple was not the means for her to SEEK that, as Beelzebub’s Tales for Gurdjieff. We do have a record of her seeking in what is called, The Mother’s Agenda and Notes on the Way. Consequently, one has to make a supreme effort to discover the truth in those records, since they were precisely that: notes on the way, and nothing more. The result of that ‘way’, its victorious outcome, was her original plan of the Temple.

Now let me briefly discuss a related creation which arose also out of the Mother’s Temple: The New Way. Indeed, the book’s central protagonist is that Temple, and therefore it too partook of that special quality which links essence to form. Here is one example: on page 288 of Volume 2, note that I make this statement: ‘We have crossed the midway point of this study, the work’s 4.5 Orbit of universal being.’ As you can see, given the fact that the book consists of 578 pages, this was virtually its true midway point. I am aware that when people read this they believe that I ADDED this line once the book was written. However, this was not at all the case. I simply ‘knew’ when I had reached its halfway mark because of the experience and the knowledge that was being developed in the creative act, the ‘building’ of the Temple in book form. Moreover, as everyone knows, it is not possible to calculate with such accuracy just how many printed pages will result when composing of the manuscript is finished, especially when there are so any diagrams, foldouts, etc. Rather, since we are dealing with experiences in the creation of true objective art, what happened was simply that the essence (knowledge) contained in the book was perfectly married to and productive of the same higher manifestation of Form. Essence and Form were one. There was moreover no interference in the channelling instrument along the way. Because The New Way too arose out of a condition of Being.

There are other examples of this sort of harmony in my other books. None of this was contrived, mentally planned and arranged. All the experiences of such harmonies were simply the result of total processes.

In closing, and in all fairness to Mr. G, I should mention that I do have a high regard for his teachings, and in particular his quality as a teacher, his insights into human psychology and the condition of the human instrument and the necessity for an integral development. These may be ‘fragments’, but they are at least TRUE fragments. Most teachers today do not even offer this much. Also, there is a coherency in his fragments — let us call it a fragmentary coherency — in that he clearly perceived the need for certain tools to carry out the transformative work, and they were by and large the right ones. The Enneagram, for one. Also his attempts to formulate a new cosmology. The fact that his knowledge of the Enneagram was incomplete (he did not include the Zero and hence missed the diagram’s important relation to Time) or that he did not have the new language, an indispensable ingredient for the formulation of the new cosmology, does not mean that his work cannot be of help to people. But when one does have that complete system, the new language, the accurate and precise keys of knowledge, it seems to me futile to waste time indulging in the torturous effort to read Beelzebub’s Tales. But some people like to suffer!

But as a system I hasten to emphasise that Gurdjieff’s is one of the better ones. Only I question whether or not it is possible to make real progress in this system without the man himself as the living guide, in view of his unusual ‘essence’ which was central to the whole affair. But since you are pursuing this school, I repeat, you have chosen one of the more serious, better ones, in which many elements of real knowledge can be found.

I have only dealt with one subject in this letter basically: the question of the book’s style, because that is why you sent me Orage’s commentaries which you consider to elucidate ‘quite a bit of Gurdjieff’s deliberately difficult terminology’. I have not therefore gone into the knowledge he gives out, as such, and certainly there is much of real worth therein, which can be of effective help to seekers. But as a system of transformation, again I have to question its efficacy without Gurdjieff’s living essence at the centre. His system was very much bound up with the man himself.

Regarding the other book you mention: The Revelation in the Wilderness I have no time at present. Perhaps later. I have glanced through it in the bookstore…but, does the author know of the ‘temple’ and the ‘book’, since he uses The Revelation as his central theme, and both of which are key features of St. John’s prophecy? I doubt it. And so, one can only find in this work a similar incompleteness and effort of men in the quest of knowledge. Since there is not much time to waste any longer, for there is little time left to do the Work, I counsel the people who are studying with me that it is best to get down to the serious business of yoga, of work on oneself. And with this I am certain Gurdjieff would wholeheartedly agree!


Kodaikanal
7 October 1986


* C.S. Nott, Teachings of Gurdjieff, Chapter III, Routledge & Kegan Paul.


(Part II of this letter appears in the next issue.)

Discussions with Patrizia Norelli-Bachelet

              What is your view of Kundalini? What I have been taught is that the whole process of Kundalini, is that it rose from the lower chakra and came up to the top of the head. And then…we were in another state of consciousness; and the lower sexual energies ― whatever ― were transcended. Hasn’t that always been a traditional part of yoga?

 

Well this I find a very interesting question because, you see, you’re getting into…they call it Kundalini Yoga, but really the basis of this is the Tantra. Tantric Yoga, a very old path, an interesting path. Dealing with the Shakti, the Divine Mother. Very interesting this, because apparently this is a path that accepts the Mother, that accepts Matter. It deals with that. But yet, you understand that the whole process is to come up and out. So, basically it’s using this energy to project oneself again out. Because your body then becomes the image of the cosmos. It becomes that thing. And you are doing the same thing. You are projecting yourself out. And you do attain this higher consciousness, this Brahman Consciousness. Surely.

 

This is a part of Sri Aurobindo’s work — precisely this Ascent and Descent. And this is the important key because then it is contained in the body. Now, the discoveries that I have made are certain key points where these two things join, and what happens when they join. So, in this work, for example, you don’t experience the rise of the Kundalini as such, which you may experience in other paths, when really you can feel it. In this, you may and you may not. But you do experience the centres. At certain points they become active. And the difference is because at the same time, simultaneously you are experiencing the Descent. And the Descent is your protection really. The Descent is what keeps you in the body.

 

           The descent of ‘What’?

 

That’s a good question too, because you see you experience it as a descent of the light, as a descent of the force, the peace, whatever. The only difference is that when it is combined with this other movement, it is always dynamic. This is the point. So, it is contained in the body, and this makes it a dynamic aspect of the Divine Consciousness. You feel it as a Grace, you feel it in many ways. Usually people who are doing this Yoga physically feel a force, coming in and descending. Of course there are different degrees. We can go on saying, well the Supramental Descent, YES, but wait. Because that requires an integral process also. So, there are different degrees of this descent of energy, force, Divine Consciousness…whatever you want to call it. Depending on what you are able to receive, and also depending on the total conditions that allow for this. So, it’s a force. Call it Consciousness, that takes forms according to your particular needs, your particular stage of evolution. You may call it the Divine Grace. I mean, the Dove coming down…that photo of Agni-in-the-Core in The New Way. The impression is that. But of course there you have geometrically this combination, that you do not have anywhere else.

 

          We were talking about the spiritual ‘supermarket’ that exists in the United States. There is so much. Could you say a word; How does one find the right path? How is one directed to find the right path for himself?

 

Well, you know, that is why in India they consider that in a lifetime when you find your real guru, that is the most blessed lifetime; and that is why they revere the Guru — because of this. Because it is not easy. And you may pass many lifetimes and you don’t come upon it. It is really a supreme grace when you come to the point that you have met your master you see? And what can I say? It is not something that anybody can impose. The only thing that you can do is to put yourself inwardly in the condition to receive. And it will definitely come. Now, a way that you can go about this is this opening to the Divine, and this conscious call, this conscious offering of yourself for this purpose: that you be given this grace. There is really nothing else that you can do, to leave yourself inwardly prepared. That doesn’t mean to become stupid and accept anything, because one of the sayings of Sri Aurobindo is that people came to the Ashram for his work, they came to lose the ego but the first thing they lost was their common sense!

 

(Laughter)

 

This is certainly what happens in America! Not only America. All over! You know, when people start justifying things. There’s a breakdown of a certain ashram, and then you hear all of these justifications: Well, the Guru really meant this and he…What? He meant what he meant! Unless you really have a perception to see that this is a certain strategy…. But mostly in these movements things are very clear. You have to be very careful and be discriminating.

 

          And also it seems, at least in this country, many movements start out quite pure, and then these energies come into them….

 

In our latest newsletter, the Vishaal [1/2, June, 1986] I discuss this situation, especially in terms of eastern teachings that have come here. I was talking about movements coming from the East and getting swallowed up…

 

          And good teachers becoming really corrupted.

 

It is remarkable, what goes on. Because they are coming here and they are confronting a power that is the contribution of the United States to this world process. And they are confronting it here, really the heart of materialism. I mean in its purest sense. As a solution. As a poise. As opposed to Spirit. Solution, on the material plane. This emphasis, this focus on that. And they come here, and they tell you — all of them — (again we come right back to the same problem) they tell you: It’s an illusion.

 

Buddhism is very strong in this country, and though the Buddha didn’t preach that, this was the general outcome of his teachings. That it is an illusion and you must accept it as that, and be done with it as soon as possible. So, they come here and they think that they are going to save everyone. What are they basically preaching? Again it is some otherworldly reward, or state…. And again, because they are not…it is an escape process and they are not poising themselves properly to deal with this phenomenon that is the United States, they are undermined in this. And they succumb to this. They must. Again, it is almost mathematical. They have to succumb to that. They think they are going to bring eastern spirituality here, and what happens is they don’t have the power, they don’t have the poise to withstand this impact. And these collapses come; they are overtaken. Because they are denying the truth in this. Constantly. So that denial leaves them vulnerable. And the process goes on.

 

This is why the solution has to be this real integration of what the East represents and what the West represents; and that is then something higher. It is not taking this and taking that and putting them together. It’s this higher thing that integrates those two. And that is what we are in the process of bringing down, and discovering: this higher poise that brings about integration. If you ignore that, if you ignore that there is such a possibility of doing such a thing, you get lost over here, you get lost over there. It is inevitable. And money! That’s the key to it.

 

          That doesn’t make the philosophies bad, it’s just somehow they don’t travel very well. I wonder how effective the eastern philosophy is in the West, at all.

 

They’re ineffective. Certainly they are not the solution. I don’t mean to sound intolerant, but I am just telling you the fact which I think you can see for yourselves: that we haven’t found a solution. Of course people are very disturbed because then they say, ‘Well, the problem is that we must find a western solution.’

 

          Yoga for the West.

 

Yes, you know, it goes on and on like this. But it’s all the same thing. There is a universal work, there is something that goes beyond this kind of division. And this is what is being born today. This is mainly the reason for this interchange: so that everybody is ready for it.

 

          A lot of people have had very significant and powerful experiences, no matter how impure the teaching was by the time they got it. It has helped them on. I have had experiences that have helped me on my path, to get to a point where I am receptive to other things.

 

Yes, this is it. And exposed you to things. Thirty years ago young people did not even know the word yoga existed. They didn’t know what it was. The terminology. If you are interested in astrology: look how many people can now appreciate better the Gnostic Circle because they know that something like the 12 zodiacal signs exist. They know the symbols. Before this wasn’t possible.

 

          Another thing we were discussing was our relationship to the religion we were brought up in. And all three of us said we were no longer very interested in Judaism. And yet, what was the significance of having incarnated in Jewish bodies? Do we have to come to terms with that in a certain way, or are we free to become yogis or whatever we wish? Do you see a conflict there?

 

There’s the same conflict that anybody would have who was born…I mean, I was born into a Catholic family and, well, I don’t find any traces of that at all. However, culturally of course there are, and we carry that along.

 

          Spiritually, do we have to come to terms with this spiritually in any given incarnation?

 

No, I really don’t think so in terms of spirituality; but, you know, when you do find your way, there is that immediate recognition. As happened to me, for example. The language was the one. You understood it right away, you vibrated to it. And this had nothing to do with what a Catholic…but it wasn’t Hindu also. It was Sri Aurobindo’s language which was also new. This work is as revolutionary in India as it may be anywhere else. In India the only difference is that they’ll all sit and say, Yes, Yes…because the Hindus accept absolutely anything! Everybody says yes-yes-yes, but nobody does anything! So they all agree, and you don’t get any flak. It’s all wonderful, and the Divine is wonderful, and everybody is so full of bhakti. That’s it. And they mean it sincerely. It is not a pose; in every fibre of their beings, they are the most tolerant people in the world.  I mean they really feel everybody is an avatar or Mohammed or Jesus or whatever.  Mohammed they have a little bit of difficulty with.                                                             (Laughter)

Jesus is not an Avatar to them.

 

Yeah but they can accept Jesus.  Mohammed is a little bit violent; chopped off a lot of heads there and destroyed a lot of Temples and all that.  With Christianity the main problem there was the British Raj, otherwise there would be no problem at all with the religion as such.

That’s the difference in India where yes, of course everyone accepts, but you know they will have [unclear speech here].   But at the same time those are the foundations of Hinduism.  They are, and they carry them forward.

 

But you see, in India too they have moved away from this, and they have not accepted this solution here. They have finally come to that grand proclamation that material creation is an illusion. That was the height of what they reached, until Sri Aurobindo came along. It was in the Middle Ages that they reached that; and believe me, it is such a strong imprint that it seems almost impossible to get over it.

 

          You’re talking about the Lila?

 

Yes, it is supposed to be an ‘illusion’.

 

So, the problems for everybody in this respect are the same. The Jewish problem is very interesting because of the condition of western society — Jewish and Christian at the same time. Again you have to look at these things: What are these religions, what are these peoples? I have written many chapters on this in the third volume of The New Way, on the Jews and the Arabs and this development of the mental and the vital. Each one representing that. Now, it seems crazy: How can a people represent this? Well, you take the Arabs, — just to give you a little detail of the Arabs representing the vital being in the world sense. And isn’t it clear: ENERGY. Look at what they did to the world in 1973. That turned everything upside-down. They had this ‘black gold’, and everything was in reaction to that. And you take it just in terms of animal symbols too, because you have the Horse that represents that vital energy from very ancient times. And you have the most magnificent horse that came out of the Arab world: the Arabian, and the Thoroughbred.

 

Little things like that will give — apart from the characteristics of the race, of the religion that formed out of it — the nature of the race. And then you have the Jewish, of course, that represents the mental. Very clear. You see?

 

So right now they are at each other’s throats, and rather than be integrated…

 

There is no solution.

 

 There can’t be a solution.

 

On that level there is no solution. Only when the higher ‘thing’ manifests.

 

 But wouldn’t you have thought it would have happened earlier when there was the transition from the vital to the mental, rather than at this point, when we are in the transition from the mental to the spiritual?

 

No, because now we are going into these higher levels where this is possible. Before it wasn’t at all. You have to complete these circles before you get to the point where you can…

 

          But it is more possible?

 

Well if it is not possible now it is not going to be possible at any other time! Because it is one way or the other now. Remember, it is the 9th Manifestation. That’s the key. It is the 9th Manifestation. From the 9th you extend your boundaries. And that is exactly what is happening now. Then you go to the point of integration and unity, — the 10th, 11th, and 12th.

 

          I have another question which is, how, if at all, does this teaching deal with the concept that there are souls that incarnate on other galaxies,  and then come to Earth; either as rescue souls, or whatever, at certain points in evolution here.

 

Oh gosh, I have had to deal with this problem….

 

(Laughter)

 

          I can see it’s not one of your favourite subjects!

 

(Laughter)

 

No, I…again, it’s slightly irrelevant, in a sense. You know, anything is possible. Well, I certainly believe that we are seeing something from outer space, that the people that are seeing these, are seeing. But the question is, What are we seeing? Where is it coming from? Is it coming really from another galaxy? Or is it from another dimension that now has taken this form, because we are in this Age. There are so many descriptions of things in the Bible; of visions that people have, or angels. Well, now people see a man from Mars, or something else, from Sirius, or some other galaxy. Much of this is conditioned. So, there is something behind it all, you see. But people have to realise that the form that it takes is very largely conditioned by our stage of evolution. We are in the space age; so obviously we like those kind of solutions. That’s one aspect.

 

The other aspect is; what has that got to do with the Earth, really? I think that again this is a solution from outside. This is saying, ‘well we are going to be saved by something from outside.’ I know that that is not so.

 

          When I ask, I’m not coming from that point. I almost didn’t ask, because I felt, it really is not relevant. There still is the work that needs to be done here. But I do think it’s relevant, on the other hand, because while you were talking…you know when it came into my head actually? It was when you were talking about the human being evolving and at certain points in the life if the right choice is not made, then these crusts will develop. It occurred to me that perhaps a soul…I’ve been told that I am a soul that came to this Earth during the Atlantean era and that I was from a place called ‘Arcturus’.

 

You too!  (Laughter)  Great!… I’m not ridiculing this, I just find it interesting.

 

          It doesn’t matter. It doesn’t mean anything to me. It’s not useful for me to know that. But it still is perplexing because it makes me want to know, do souls incarnate on Earth and take part in the cycle and then just go off somewhere else?

 

Well, they may. But honestly I’ve dealt with this VERY DEEPLY lately. I can’t tell you how deeply I’ve dealt with this very galaxy!

 

(Laughter)

 

And I have great respect for certain people…prominent ones from that galaxy! But the point is that…they don’t have the answers. And why? Because they really are closed in that perception that they have come and that they are bringing something, and they have a special mission to help. They are involved in this whole lifting off the planet when the axis…. Well, now what happens here again is that they have not understood what the nature of the work is, what the Earth as a planet signifies, and what its purpose is in the solar system. And that’s all I’m concerned with.

 

If you’re coming from Arcturus and you’re going to help, that’s well and good; but you’ve got to do this. Whatever you bring from Arcturus is not going to be any solution here at all, because, you see, it is the total conditions at each moment; and you cannot reproduce those any place else. Or else you don’t come into this body. Then you really come in a space suit, or whatever, with all your gear, and you go back again. But you cannot reproduce this. The work must be done in the body, and rooted here and with all the solutions that all the totality of these conditions can provide. And they cannot come from outside.

 

They may be souls that are evolved, in a certain sense they have experienced different things, and have a certain maturity and wisdom; but those people are still infants when they come into this. Because the conditions are different. And require different solutions.

 

Again, I find this another escape. It is fascinating because it’s a wave going through the United States. You get these communications, from automatic writing, or whatever, and people believe absolutely anything that comes through. And it’s all very flattering…probably they even told you that you have a mission, you’re going to do this, that and the other. That is usually the way it goes on. It was obviously an ‘evolved’ soul that has come back. Nobody was just a little sweeper, a garbage collector, or something like that. It’s something very grand sounding. And as you said very rightfully, So what?

 

There you are, stuck in that body, with all your complexes or your whatever…and you’ve got to deal with that, and how are you going to deal with it? It doesn’t help you in the least to know these things. Even if it were true. And most people that really are that, don’t bother with it. In fact, they don’t even know. And it never comes to them. It may very well be, but it’s just that somehow these things then take possession of people and they deviate from the…

 

          That’s right. This came through a psychic and I had put off going to a psychic for a very long time because I saw a lot of people using information that came from psychics as a way of avoiding responsibility for their own lives and dealing with external solutions.

 

How did she get this, by automatic writing?

 

          She has a source. It comes through a source, and she is a channel.

 

Well, it’s the same thing.

 

          Right. But I had the same response which was, on one level, this was very interesting, but it doesn’t really change what…you know, it doesn’t change…

 

And the point is that it may not be true, and then you are carried…. Usually it is not true. Usually it’s imaginative, and there are beings that are playing a lot of games in other dimensions. You know, they are communicating a lot of things to create a very big confusion.

 

And why? Why is this taking place? Because really, now comes the crunch! Everybody wants to stamp their own image on what is taking place here. It is not even wicked, as such. It’s just that there are forces, as there are forces that work for the destiny of the Earth itself, in attunement with the Earth’s soul, there are forces that have a completely different purpose; and would like to see their solutions, or their image stamped upon this, in total ignorance.

 

You know, what I find very interesting is that some of these psychics, for example, are contacting people who lived here and have died, right? They have their sources and they contact those people, and they have their ‘friends’ on the other side, or whatever. And somehow, just the fact that it’s a disembodied entity, makes everything true! If they had a limited consciousness here, they’ve got the same limited consciousness on the other side. They may know a few other things, they may be able to predict, on a very limited scale, happenings; because they can manipulate certain forces and allow for things to happen. But this is all on a very, very limited level. And this is the danger, because if you know this, and if you deal with this consciously, it can be very interesting. If you don’t, it can be extremely dangerous. Really dangerous. Or else just distracting.

 

          Can all the comments that you’ve just made be applied to Ramtha?

 

I’ve heard that name, among all the…on the West coast, isn’t it? I’ve heard through another person, who has a different ‘source’ (!) I haven’t read the writings of this Ramtha, so I can’t comment directly; I would have to see them. Somebody said it was awful, and this, that and the other. There were things apparently that were positively awful! I’d have to see it myself. But, I can say that usually the level of these things is very old — old consciousness. This is what I have felt of any of those communications that I have picked up. It is an old, old consciousness. And it really has nothing to do with the real work.

So it’s a problem, because some people are greatly uplifted by these things. For some people it is their only contact with something out of the material, something which they can term ‘spiritual’. And they don’t see the limitation. In India people understand this in very great depth: the occult planes; how these forces work. Tantra deals with that.

 

So in India they make a clear distinction between occult practices and spiritual practices, while in America they don’t understand this at all. And therefore they just push it [the distinction] aside.

 

Now in this Yoga you don’t. You cannot say, I want only the spiritual and not the occult, because the occult practices are dealing with that Cosmic Body of the Mother. That is where all of that is going on; and that’s a very important part. But you see, it can be that ‘maya’, that temptress, that illusion; in terms of the Rig Veda, she is called ‘Diti’. Or it can be Aditi, the Mother of Light, the Mother of Unity, the Mother of Bliss. So, you have these two things, and it is a very fine line. One of the most difficult experiences is when you see these two sides of the thing, — the dark and light of the same Mother, and you don’t know what the ultimate solution is.

 

So, it is not possible to say: Just leave it all aside. I think what really one has to say is, ‘Be very careful and find a guide who you can trust in these matters, if you really feel…’ If it is not your destiny to go along that way and you really want a spiritual level, it’s best then just to leave it alone because it can lead you astray. And if it is your destiny that you work on a more integral thing, then it’s good to have somebody who knows about these things, as a guide. And usually the people who are serving as mediums are not very evolved in that way. They are usually just channels through whom this is coming. So, between you and that disembodied entity, whoever, you have got to rely on your own discrimination. And most of us simply do not have the knowledge.

 

          I saw part of the ‘Ramtha Tapes’, which are being circulated in this country. It was very interesting to watch just what happened to the woman when she became that, and the way she spoke. A lot of what was said was said in humour, almost in a flippant way. There was a great deal of flippancy. But, oddly enough, some of Sri Aurobindo’s teachings were presented.

 

They do. They do.

 

          It’s not the old teaching. There are new teachings coming through, about the evolution of the new body. It got so silly…a really mixed bag.

 

That is the whole problem. These entities do have access to certain information. Everybody is now onto the thing about the new body. It’s clear that something has happened, cosmically, let’s say, to allow these things. But it is what you said: a mixed bag. That’s the problem. That’s the most serious problem, it is that how are you going to distinguish? And one thing is a contact like that. Another thing is really getting involved. Now I know this because I have dealt with this thoroughly. I’ve done this myself, and I know it thoroughly, how it works. And I know the point at which you have to be very careful, because, yes, so many things come through that are simply astounding. But it’s a mixture. In the experiences that I had it wasn’t so much the mixture; that wasn’t the problem. But I could see…. I received years ago volumes of things, that today people are publishing. Well, I destroyed them all because I said, what’s the point, what am I going to do with this. It was like a weight. So one day — I was in India — I just made a bonfire of the whole thing! It wouldn’t have occurred to me, ever, to publish these things. Yet these people go on doing it. Well, it can be very important for your own personal development. I had a particular contact, and of course it identified itself as the Divine Mother…well, but I had to test it constantly, and really put itself and myself through very difficult situations, in order to be able to come to the truth of what was behind it, how it functions. For your own personal development, if you have a contact like that, sometimes it can of course be very important. But the way it is being used today is simply another ego manifestation. Usually the solutions are old, as I say. They may say some things…and they usually say what you want to hear. I mean, it is very clever manipulation that is very difficult for people to deal with. We don’t know how. We don’t have that knowledge.

 

Tantric yogis, for example, can deal with those things, but they go through very long and severe initiations, a whole process that allows them to do this. And still there is always a danger, still. But because they do worship the Mother, the Shakti, they have to deal with that. They cannot…because, as I say, all of this is taking place within the cosmic body: the Mother, within that Cosmic Body. And if you are following a path like that, you invariably come to this point, when you have to discriminate. But you make a discrimination. And you know what is coming from an even higher source.

 

So, that’s all I have to say. Each case is very individual in this. You have to go into it, you have to see what it means for that person. What I always say is, ‘All right then, MOVE ON.’ That was interesting, it mentioned Sri Aurobindo, it might have reminded you, might have been a source to remind you of something. But you move on to more solid work. But I find a lot of these people don’t because they are flattered and they create then a whole cult around this. This is happening in America.

 

          Including a lot of money.

 

It’s phenomenal the money that people pour out because of these kind of…

 

          The spiritual teachings I received from Indian teachers always said that you can’t take money for teaching about God. You know, that knowledge has to be given free. Or if there is some, it is minimal, just so that the teacher can continue to function. But I always feel that when people come to teach about God and they say the seminar about God is $400…. There is something not quite right about that!

 

There was one who had a happy balance in all this, to whom I was rather close at one time. I may disagree with some points, but in this…. That was Krishnamurti. I think he handled that beautifully. You know, he was involved with a lot of money always because the people he was with had money. And he lived the best…I mean, his attire, everything. It was always the best. Yet, at least all the times I saw him, in Rome and Gstaad, of course we didn’t have to pay to go. He had money, because he started schools, so he needed it for that. But he kept a happy balance in this; he dealt with it in the right way.

 

You need money. You have to have it, to publish books, to do this, that. I had a terrible conflict in the beginning, where I thought, Well, money, that’s out, that’s really awful. And of course I had a shock to see the Mother dealing with money. I thought, at that time, that it should have been like Ramakrishna…who couldn’t even touch a coin, because if he touched it his fingers BURNED! It was awful.

 

Well, that was totally stupid, also. It was obviously something unresolved in me at that time, that couldn’t deal with this problem. So, there has to be a balance. Sure. Money represents something. We can’t deny it; and we have to deal with it, I won’t say spiritually, but we have to understand what the force is and why these movements get so much. How is it that they can draw in millions, they become multi-million dollar organisations. And at that point the whole thing is lost.

 

But I think in a case like Krishnamurti’s, for example, whatever he started out with he did not lose. Whether one agrees with what he says or not, is a different thing. But that never contaminated it, this contact with money never did. And he had very rational, very sane dealings with people that followed him. There was never a difficulty, never the scandals that come out…. First class, you know.

 

That was Krishnamurti’s destiny. It was that from the beginning; in fact, that was why he was able to handle it so well.

 

          It’s gotten out of hand in this country.

 

Of course. But everything in that sense has gotten out of hand.

 

          I think part of the reason is that people are so desperate for an answer, they’re willing to pay and they think…

 

          …the more they pay, the more true the answer will be.

 

          It follows from that that we are imbalanced, that we work from the left hemisphere of the brain, altogether, in this country?

 

Well, I really can’t go into that deeply. I think that there is a certain amount of truth in that, but I would say that we are functioning from half levels of both. You know what I mean? This is more the answer, that there is a distortion on both. Because if you really go into it, in the areas that each hemisphere governs you find the same kind of distortion. So, I would say that we tend to think of it now in terms of the left being prominent. But, only apparently, really; only on the surface is that true. I think that the problems we face as a society are projections from both sides that are simply not integrated and in harmony, because, again, something else….

 

This is where Sri Aurobindo’s teachings come in, very strongly. This whole matter of a manifestation of what he calls the Supermind, which is something beyond all of this; that is, that would be the governing principle of a new race. And that is why all of this is breaking down now, you see, because this higher principle must come in and establish itself. And then put into right perspective everything. Every part of the being, governed by both — the more emotive and the more intellectual — what we call the mental and the vital.

 

          There is a lot of confusion in this area. For instance in India they talk of the mind; but what I think they’re referring to is a mixture of the emotions and the intellect…

 

I think there is a confusion. I agree with you…they often refer to mind also as the spirit. Like the hymns that Vivekananda, that Ramakrishna used to chant, you often find them translated as, ‘O Mind, soar above’ and so on. And there it clearly gives the impression of the spirit. This is what they mean. These are the technicalities that at some point become important to clarify. In the beginning it is just semantics; it is unimportant. But when you get into the Yoga very seriously, at some point you really have to start defining. You want to know what you are dealing with, what Mind is, what Consciousness is, what the Soul is. Make distinctions between these things. Right now it is very interesting the work they are doing on the brain. I think it is extremely interesting, but I think that, again, it’s like everything else: it’s just the beginning. There are very big possibilities of discovery, as yet not really fully understanding…

 

*********

 

 

Change and Stability — the heart of the ‘New World’

I write these lines in the United States of America, the nation whose coming into existence changed the face of the world. For a new world was indeed born, where new energies could find their freedom of expression, largely unburdened by the weight of past traditions.

The impression of a new and vibrant vitality is unmistakable in America, as anyone coming from an older, ancient civilisation can affirm when entering within the borders of this vast country. Indeed, one feels ‘burdenless’, and this creates the impression that anything is possible in the United States, the impossible appears totally possible, the attainable is there for all to attain. This is so largely because one is free of the weight of the past.

In terms of the new way, this condition is especially meaningful. I have delved deeply into the question of ‘time energy’. By specific yogic processes it was discovered that the experience of time ― the lived experience of conscious awareness, on this planet, in our particular physical bodies ― revolves around the question of energy, much as all else in this universe. Time is energy, or the executive force of Consciousness. As Sri Aurobindo wrote in Savitri: ‘The executor of my will, eternal Time.’

But an experience lived in an unconscious state, with half or more of the energies of the being asleep, results in the fact that time begins to condense energy within one’s consciousness-being. Consequently, one way in which we can describe the ego is by this formulation: the ego is the pivot formed by those accumulated, unresolved substances that come into being because of a wrong poise of the consciousness of the individual, whereby the time energies of the past form a ‘knot’ and pull the being off centre. That is, one lives one’s life pivoting this off-centre, which is the dross of our experience in time. The past becomes thus our prison. It is the burden we carry and which nails us to our cross in the lowest chakra.

Certain Yogas have sought to release this energy by various techniques which would bring about enlightenment. Tantra is one such path. The rise of the Kundalini in Tantra Yoga is one method to bring about a release. But there are certain limitations in the Tantric and Kundalini Yogas which I have described in the third volume of The New Way. Suffice to say here that seers have long been aware of this ‘knotted energy’ — or the coiled Serpent at the base of the spine. The ego’s pivot, and hence the pivot of the present human race, is the sex centre. Consequently, we have the Left-Handed path of Tantra which seeks to utilise the sex act for the attainment of its highest goal.

This is the situation for each human being born in a human body on this planet. But it is also applicable to nations. Some nations are tremendously burdened by the past, to such an extent that in order to free themselves from these shackles, they do so by seeking to obliterate them completely. China is one example offering this type of resolution, in that it has dramatically cut away its past and introduced a new order. But there are others as well. In the Middle Ages we find that Islam stepped in to fill a void it had created by a similar act of cutting away the existing order. And what was once there, a force of the new, has today become a conservative power of the past.

The United States of America does not have this burden, but because of this we find an interesting situation prevailing, perhaps even more interesting in view of the astrological sign that rules the nation, — Cancer. This sign describes the ego pivot, given the present condition of the race. That is, it is the sign that describes where and when the separation occurs in the evolution of consciousness that permits an individual to emerge. In our present condition of incompletion and unenlightenment, and our difficulty in dealing with time energy in a manner which would allow for a gnostic race to come into being, Cancer thus describes the ego pivot. Hence it is the sign of the past in astrological tradition, and also the
‘end of life’ period and the ‘tomb’. Its hieroglyphic symbol pictures the void we orbit as a race, an ‘empty centre’. And indeed the past is cancer hieroglyphlike a black hole; it consumes precious time energy, the lack of which keeps us from enjoying a state of immortal being.

America is representative of this condition because though she does not carry the burden of the past, yet she pivots a certain void. Other nations fill that void with traditions that have accumulated and which eventually become forces of inertia. This, however, the United States has not been permitted to do. The nation has only a short history of barely 200 years, and this short span covers precisely the period of history that saw tremendous upheavals the world over with respect to tradition and continuity.

America is indeed part of the ‘new world’. But in the context of this work, we may use this term as synonymous with ‘the new creation’. That is, this is a global condition and the time of the discovery of America marked the period when a ‘new world’ was being born on Earth, involving the whole planet. The coming into being of the United States as a nation in 1776 (a year of 3 power according to the mathematics of unity) was part of the foundation-laying for a new world order. But an essential ingredient in this order is a vision of oneness and unity. When these become firm pillars of our seeing and are applied to international affairs, then a new world order will take the place of the divisive oldness we live at present.

This vision of oneness and unity must permeate all aspects of life, the individual’s daily experience as well as relations between nations. Similarly, it must refashion our vision of the zodiacal wheel. For the condition that assails us of an incomplete experience of time, forces a separative vision of the wheel; and this creates a fragmented view of the zodiacal signs, whereby each is analysed in isolation of the rest. But with the new perceptive faculties now emerging, such as the Mind of Light, (see TVN 0/2, December 1985) this limitation is overcome. Accompanying the vision of planetary oneness there is a seeing of the integrated, united zodiac. Thus Cancer is no longer a sign separate from the rest, since that would then describe the ‘void’ central to the old creation and hence be productive of the off-centre pivot in the individual; and consequently it would be the sign representing the ego. Any nation, therefore, ruled by Cancer during times when these perceptive limitations prevailed on Earth, would suffer also from the severe limitations the ego would impose. (The several bouts with isolationist policies that the United States has experienced would indicate the old poise and an ‘unintegrated’ Cancer influence.)

However, the United States of America is one of the nations at the forefront of the new world order, and she came into being precisely when those first foundations of human unity and global oneness were being laid. The last three centuries of this millennium are ushering in a radically different harmony among nations and individuals; and the final three decades of this century are carrying this process to its culmination. Consequently, America’s rulership by Cancer carries a different significance. The void is still central, this is a fact, but not having tradition to fill it, the nation has come to express another attribute of the sign: Change. The result is a country caught up in a process of compulsive change, attempts to fill the void. The economic system America champions in the world is also strongly coloured by this factor, since the consumerist society is one that feeds on this need. New products must be churned out with relentless fury to replace old ones; and this, when accompanied by sophisticated marketing and advertising techniques, drives the public to desire ever better products with an insatiable appetite. The new technology is heightening this condition because daily new inventions render obsolete those of yesterday. The consumer is thus driven along on the crests of this compulsive wave of change.

Yet this situation lies very close to the key purpose for America’s existence, her true dharma, we may say. It is a very special attribute that she offers the world and represents her contribution to the symphony of nations, and in particular for the new world order that is upon us. This drive to renew, rather than a clinging to tradition and the ways of the past, is the expression of her Cancer heritage. But since this is a harmony of the One and the Many, one cannot appreciate this heritage and contribution unless the vision of oneness replaces the old seeing. Thus Cancer in the new holistic vision would not be the ego, if taken in conjunction with the other signs, all constituting one evolutionary ‘journey’, one united and connected process. More pointedly, Cancer must be viewed in conjunction with the sign that stands opposite on the wheel, Capricorn. We then find that these two poles form one axis, so to speak. Capricorn then fills that void with the stable core that it provides, for that is its dharma; while Cancer offers to Capricorn the essential ingredient it needs: the drive to renew, to change, without which the stability of Capricorn would become its power of undoing by virtue of a stagnation of energies.

India is known to be ruled by Capricorn, and within the symphony of nations she does provide us with that stable core, which has resulted in the fact that India has given the world so many philosophical systems and spiritual paths and leaders. But a harmonious interchange between these two nations, India and America, is essential now, especially for the latter, which has yet to fulfil her dharma. The United States may have been born as an independent nation in 1776, that year of 3 power, but her journey in the discovery of her soul is still incomplete. Likewise, though India — the new India — was born in 1947, also a year of 3 power, she too awaits the moment of her psychic fulfilment.

Both nations have reached a very important crossroads, and this has become especially apparent to me in my recent travels in the United States. But opposing any true expression of the American soul are forces of inertia which are making a concerted effort to fill that central void. The rise of conservatism in this decade, accompanied by a phenomenal increase in fundamentalism, indicates that occult forces are seeking to draw America away from her true destiny, — a destiny which in fact she has not yet fulfilled.

This of course may be said of all nations: none have fulfilled their destinies. It may be said of the entire Earth. The planet stands at a formidable crossroads: on one side lies collapse, caving in of energies, destruction, and on the other we find the new creation which the Earth is meant to house and which is the true and sole reason for her existence. This planet is to provide the physical base for this evolution to a higher species and a gnostic society.

The turning point America (and India) faces, is thus the same the whole Earth faces. What is going to emerge? Out of this great churning will the Earth’s soul be victorious and her child live and take his place in the complete harmony of the System? Or will the forces of Inertia prevail and cast this new creation into the black hole of the past, aborting the birth of the One Earth and the harmonious interrelations between nations and between individuals?

It is clear that this crucial juncture is upon us as a species, as a planet. There is no longer any possibility of an individual salvation, — read ‘escape’. It is abundantly evident that isolated parts cannot disengage themselves from this decisive reckoning. Thus the critical juncture that America faces expresses the turning point of our entire civilisation. What is to come? What is, in the first place, the real nature of the victory?

This may be said to be the central issue of the present discussion, and about which we seek to be very clear. At stake is the destiny of an entire civilisation. But more than that, it is the destiny of a planet. The decisive moment of which we are witnesses and participants, concerns the unveiling of the Earth’s soul.

In our racial memories we carry truth-seeings of our planetary psychic being. These have been conveyed in various ways and handed down throughout the Ages, — in epics, myths, or in records left by individual seers of their truth perceptions which all traditions have preserved. These are veiled prophetic glimpses, of seeings into that soul dimension. Yet the difference with our times is of capital importance. We are now living the actual Birth, a condition which the world has not known prior to our Age. Or if it has in the endless recurring cycles of Time, that event has receded deep into our collective unconscious. We have lost the living and conscious connection with that planetary condition. Some attempt to reconstruct this past, to ferret out traces of cultures and civilisations which seem to indicate that the Earth has known the full birth of her soul. But I am not especially concerned with what might have been thousands of years ago. I am solely concerned with the actual birth we are living now; and I realise that the times we live in are, for this reason, the most glorious and exciting that our race has living memory of. We are experiencing that great Birth. We have the possibility to be conscious participants in this unique event. For out of the labour pains of our times, the new creation emerges. Can there be any more sublime grace than to be offered by destiny the possibility of a conscious participation in this revolutionising happening?

An event of such phenomenal importance and proportions is clearly a global involvement, concerning nations and individuals. Therefore, if one observes world events with the eye of a new Seeing, enlightened by this faculty of clear vision, they take on a different meaning. We view them in a new perspective. Accordingly, this introduces a heightened sense of responsibility. For example, the turning point that the United States faces becomes a matter of deepest concern for all nations and people. We cannot stand aloof from the consequences a wrong turn at this stage would signify. In addition, a true spiritual insight reveals that the old methods for dealing with our problems are not adequate to influence events and people or change the course of destiny during this entirely new Birth. To seek to usher in the new Creation requires a new way, a new process. And this is what we are concerned with primarily. It is more than clear that the right course is not going to be found in the old paths of the spirit, nor through the already outdated solutions science and political ideologies provide. Rather, it is abundantly clear that a new consciousness has to come into being which can deal with the tremendous mental development of the human race, — the major conditioning factor of our civilisation. That is, a supramental change has to come about — or rather, is coming about. And we seek to become more conscious instruments in this great Change.

However, this requires special Knowledge. In my travels in America, I have been able to observe that there exists a decided immaturity in questions of Spirit. Unlike India where for thousands of years sages, seers, and yogis have been exploring all the existent dimensions open to the individual in his or her quest for Truth — from the highest reaches of the spirit, down through the innumerable occult planes and into the physical — , America is barely at the first portal in this investigation. Consequently, I have found that this lack of a precise Knowledge about those subtle, occult dimensions and the forces working therein has placed in jeopardy the realisation of the country’s higher potential. I feel that this matter is serious enough to merit a somewhat detailed discussion, and it is my hope that an explanation of the nature of the problem will help to arrest an incipient wrong turn and guide those individuals who could provide a certain amount of precious energies for the great Change back to the safe and real path of the Earth’s own way.

A great wave is sweeping over America, dispersing energies and creating a considerable amount of confusion among seekers regarding the nation’s true role in the new dispensation that the Earth stands poised to experience. This is occurring because, as mentioned, there is very little real understanding of the true nature of the occult dimensions that surround us,  — those subtle dimensions with their respective forces, entities, and so forth, that ‘fold into’ the physical, and permeate it. These entities seek to mould the consciousness of the people in ‘their own image’, quite simply. Yet they have no real role to play in this manifestation; or rather, no directional role.

This has presently reached alarming proportions. One of its main expressions is the rampant influences these occult forces have acquired by means of mediumistic channels — be this either through automatic writing, the pendulum, the planchette, or simply a ‘source’ speaking through a sensitive, all of which are means to receive ‘messages’ from disembodied entities. There are many ways to receive such communications, but the actual methods are unimportant. The resultant communications are, however, a matter of deep concern to anyone knowledgeable about such matters.

The position needs to be explained in greater detail. In an integral path, and above all a supramental manifestation which presupposes an integration of all levels of the being, from the subtlest realms of the Spirit to the densest dimensions of material creation, it is not possible to brush aside the occult realms and all their intermediate planes as ‘illusory’, or to consider them plagued by the scourge of impermanency and hence to be dismissed as unreal. This has been done in the past. In fact, all spiritual disciplines and philosophies have propagated this view in one way or another. They all prescribe an extra-cosmic apotheosis, and in so doing the question of knowledge about the occult planes becomes irrelevant, since the Cosmic Body of the Mother is dismissed as ‘unreal’. The aim is to escape those subtle as well as physical planes, which are labelled Illusion, or Maya. This attitude is reflected in zodiacal tradition by the aforementioned separation between Cancer and Capricorn. By this divisive view, Cancer then becomes Diti of Vedic tradition, the Mother of darkness and division. Aditi, the unifying Mother, only comes into being when this point is joined in the perceptive vision to Capricorn.

In calling creation ‘illusion’, this has not freed the race from an interpenetration by the occult forces of this physical dimension. In fact, today we find that this disregard fostered by the spiritual authorities has created fertile ground for occult forces to influence happenings on the planet and they have come to wield considerable power over people, especially those engaged in a quest for Truth. It is not that those forces can effectively impede the new Birth, or even that they care to do so. What is happening, however, and which is truly lamentable, is that channels that could serve the Divine as instruments for the Supramental Change are being taken over by these powers of lesser significance; and worse yet, they are cajoled into believing that they are those chosen instruments utilised for this change.

I must point out that this is not a new phenomenon. In India the role of these forces has long been accurately known. But what is new is the all-pervasiveness of the happening. Yet Tantra, for instance, is a specialised Indian path with a specific body of knowledge concerning those occult realms. Indeed, any path that places the Divine Mother on its central altar of worship — such as the Tantric and ancient Vedic — perforce has to accept the reality of those innumerable occult dimensions that constitute Her consciousness-being. In her cosmic form she is the Body of the Absolute; and even as our own physical bodies contain subtle as well as denser material sheaths, so too does the Cosmic Mother’s ‘body’ embrace these same dimensions in macrocosmic proportions. Consequently, in the Supramental Yoga, in which the union with the Divine Shakti is paramount, it is not possible to either deny or ignore the existence of those occult planes with the forces that inhabit them.

However, it must be cautioned that an even more finely honed discrimination is required in this new path, insofar as it harmonises both the individual and the collectivity and by consequence it integrates all aspects of existence. This means that in the Supramental Manifestation, we cannot disengage the individual from the circumscribing collective consciousness. It is all one. Thus the phenomenon of communicating with the occult entities we are describing is of major concern to us since it is a primary influence today in the nation that has a special role to play in the dawning new creation.

These occult forces are seeking to gain influence on Earth by usurping certain channels, and especially by using the extensive communications network for the express purpose of extending their influence as widely as possible. At stake is the destiny of the planet. Is she to be the home of the supramental creation and thus fulfil her true destiny, or are those forces going to succeed in disfiguring the message and usurping the individual channels and moulding the vision into their lesser image? Each force in those planes attempts to do just that. The proverbial war between the Dark and the Light revolves finally around this conflict: the dark simply represents those forces of Inertia which strive to impede the forward movement and the establishment of the New. They are those blocked energies of the Past that resist change at all cost. And the seeker today faces an arduous task, for those influences come under the guise of the Good. It may also be said that as far as those entities are concerned, given the limited knowledge they possess, they are good. But as far as this work is concerned, though we must agree that a certain goodness exists, in the context of the new creation, what does ‘good’ really mean?

The point to bring forth here is that what may have been valid and true in ages past is not necessarily the light of today. Quite the contrary. Or what might be valid and true for another galaxy in another star system, may not be relevant and healthy for this planet, Earth. But let us briefly analyse this situation.

The Supramental Creation is a thing indigenous to planet Earth. Therefore it emerges from this planet’s own consciousness-being and in harmony with her own evolutionary laws. Via these laws that new creation comes into being, therefore resulting in an expression of the Earth’s particular and unique inherent Truth-essence, — not something imposed from outside, no matter how romantic such interventions may appear to our fanciful and imaginative tastes. It may be safely stated that the salient feature of this new creation is precisely a society in which each individual and every aspect of that society expresses their inherent truth of being.

One aspect that is perhaps the central ingredient in this evolutionary development is the gestation and birth process. The cycle of 9 is thus fundamental and it is the means used to create a new blueprint of the new consciousness to establish new ‘forms’. Therefore to expect that this new world is to come into being on Earth through channels external to that process and through guidance from other galaxies, or by the help of guidance from the occult dimensions through any particular ‘source’, is to fail to understand the real process and its full mechanism for introducing change.

The forces in these other dimensions are typal entities (see TVN 1/3; Sri Aurobindo on the Supramental Evolution). They are not engaged in this sort of evolutionary process. Yet they do seek to spread their ‘word’ on this planet, in this physical dimension, a fact which is made especially evident today by the great proliferation of mediums and ‘sources’. But lacking the capacity to discriminate on those planes, the seeker in America is being drawn into an area of occultism that can be extremely dangerous for the layman who has no secure grounding in the knowledge required to deal with those planes and forces. This situation has long been appreciated in India, and from very ancient times a distinction was made between spiritual attainments and the occult. In addition, it has always been recognised that to attain any proficiency in occultism a specialised preparation is required, and, in particular, the guidance of a trusted and reliable master or guru, to assist the disciple in the early stages in order to avoid a catastrophic possession by the forces operating in the occult planes.

To illustrate, I would like to reproduce a portion from a Tantric text that deals with this matter. It cautions the seeker on the spiritual path and lays bare the dangers one faces. The same advice can be extended to seekers in America, who unquestioningly accept all that comes through occult channels. The passage is from, The Ten Great Cosmic Powers, by S. Shankaranarayanan, (Dipti Publications), page 2:

‘…There is a regular hierarchy of Gods, some of whom are far above the highest heavens of human reach. But there are also Gods and Goddesses closer to the human level. They are more readily accessible to those who aspire to them and in some cases the seeker on the Tantric path looks to the aid and lead of these deities in his effort. They are endowed with capacities and powers beyond normal human possibility, but they are not at all for that reason divine in nature. There are higher and lower classes of them, ucca and ksudra Devatas. Those that are nearest to the earth-plane, swarming in the vital world overtopping the physical, are usually of the latter type. They respond very readily to the approaches of those who seek their help but they do so mainly for their own purpose, namely, to get hold of the particular human vehicle and convert it into a centre for their activity on the earth. They may and do answer the call of the seeker in the beginning, but in the end they let him down, rather roughly, once their purpose is fulfilled. The seeker is mislead, his inner progress comes to a standstill if it does not end in disaster. The Kshudra Devatas mislead the seeker with petty glamorous gifts, induce a false sense of progress and siddhi, prevent the dawn of real Jnana [knowledge] which would expose their whole game and succeed in enslaving the man for their purpose at the cost of his soul which is betrayed into misadventure.’

In addition to the above, I would like to draw the reader’s attention to the article that appeared in this Newsletter, 0/3, February 1986, on Pendulums, Planchettes and Automatic Writing.

To conclude, it is clear that the time has come for the American seeker to extend his or her boundaries, to begin to forge truly secure foundations in a more central domain of Truth-Seeing. During my travels it became apparent that a certain saturation had taken place; it was abundantly clear that something else has to manifest now, something that represents the culmination of two decades of intense involvement with the paths of the Spirit, something that in fact can reconcile the two poles of existence — the material and the spiritual — and which are translated into our life on this planet as the presently antagonistic poises of change and stability. For us at this time, one of the most relevant attributes of the Supermind is its inherent harmonisation of these two aspects of universal manifestation, and the new way has evolved as a tool to apply this higher principle in our individual and collective lives. This path is universal in its scope, as well as the language that characterises it, and by means of which it extends its influence in the world. It was born on Earth and is of the Earth. There is no question of its subjugation to the dictates of beings from other galaxies, or entities from the occult dimensions; nor is it dependent on sanction from disembodied spirits whose consciousnesses ‘on the other side’ retain the same limitations as when they were embodied on this planet. Nonetheless, this is indeed a vision connected with certain higher planes of consciousness, those realms of the Truth-Consciousness, as Sri Aurobindo described them. But these are intrinsic parts of the Earth’s own inherent truth of being. The Supermind is the mode by which the connection with the Absolute is made, as it is for each individual born on this planet.

India can provide the central stable core with its spiritual foundation and mature knowledge and wisdom born of the ages.  But America must contribute the element of change and force of renewal, an element which is essential in any creation in matter.  A forging of an axis of this sort, balancing change and stability, is the means by which an integrated new creation, expressing itself individually and collectively, can come about and hasten the establishment on Earth of the life divine.


Kodaikanal, August, 1986





A silent Cause divine…

A silent Cause divine
Has settled in my heart
From where a laughter mocks
The busyness without.   

No movement now,
Mobility coils out from one point:
A vibrant core of quiet joy,
A snow-white ocean of fathomless Power.

Gone, gone the asking
Gone the yearning.
Nothing but that Cause remains.
Silent, impeccable and alone. 


Aryaman
3 September 1986

Discussions with Patrizia Norelli-Bachelet

…And, that’s why basically it doesn’t matter. [The order in which Patrizia Norelli-Bachelet’s books are read.] It depends on the individual development. You know, this is really a process that we are talking about, it’s not just reading books…


So, the basic material is complete in each book, would you say?


Yes it is complete according to that aspect that’s touched upon. I mean, I always find that The New Way is the most complete. That was the last book, and everything that was developed in the other books is brought to fruition in The New Way. It’s a rather different experience from the others. More total. And it has a different purpose also. Let’s say they have different purposes. But basically they can be read out of order and then what I find now is people do go back to them again. For example, if somebody reads The New Way and then reads The Gnostic Circle, they’ll go back to The New Way again later, after studying The Gnostic Circle and of course understand much more. But you can read The New Way alone.


And you read them for more than information apparently.


Of course, because that’s what I mean, it’s really a process.


I wonder if you had known the Mother. Could you tell us a little about her?


Well, there again we are talking about different levels, because I knew her inwardly before I went to the Ashram, and that’s the experience that really remained. Meeting her physically of course was a culmination. But she guided me before that inwardly to her, and that was really quite an experience, the way this was carried out. But that’s another story entirely. Physically, yes, I met her on five occasions, privately. No words, just there. The first time of course it was a very emotional experience. Having been prepared to go there and finally it happened…. I was struck by how ancient she was. Sitting in her chair. She wasn’t old, it was just ancient. And she had done a lot of work and you could see it. She was breaking through barriers and physically you could see it.


Wasn’t she going to change all the cells in her body?


Yes, but…there is a lot of misunderstanding about that. Of course that was a fundamental part of her work. It is quite interesting what she was actually doing. I see the matter quite differently, in the sense that her body was a field of this work, and the work that she did of course was a microscopic form of the larger universal body. And there were certain things that she did…but this is in the context of this work as it is developing, and the Mother had a particular task and she did that. Sri Aurobindo had his task and he did that. And we go on now and each one has to do what he has to do. So, if you look at the Mother’s work isolated, as such: what she was doing and what we suppose that she was supposed to have done, then you think… ‘Well, nothing happened’. Everyone presumed that she would transform her body and come out looking like a young girl, or Lord knows what. But of course these ideas had no bearing on what she was really doing. So, in that particular work there were so many different levels you had to simply find your way through this labyrinth, through layers and layers until you got to the true work that was going on, that she did complete.

I don’t know if you’ve read any of my things on this. It’s in The New Way basically…you know, it was very difficult for people in the Ashram at that time, especially for those who had no understanding of what was to come. The experience was very difficult because it seemed that everything ended there, with no clear understanding of what it was she had actually done. And like Sri Aurobindo, she didn’t really announce: ‘Well, I’ve finished and I’m going.’ Sri Aurobindo didn’t do anything of the sort either. He just left in a very unusual fashion. But he had completed what he had to do.

And I must say…I have to say, now, in this work…the people who are drawn to it and finally get involved, are those who are not concerned only with an individual development. This is very important. You cannot take it out of the context of the collective development and the world situation. In many other yogas and paths you can do that. But this particular work is almost, I would say, meaningless…in order to really understand it you have to see it in the context of the total development. As it is an integral yoga that Sri Aurobindo brought, in the same way the process is integral and has to deal with all levels. This may be very different from what we might…from the idea we may have of a collective work. That’s another story. But…people, for example, who are only interested in their own personal development usually become rather confused at a certain point. They don’t understand why certain things happen, what does it all mean. When you do though, it is very exciting.


Does your work include summarising their work?


Well, it’s a continuation. Very definitely. It’s building on the foundations. Let us say, my work is the outcome of the foundations that they laid. I couldn’t have done a thing without that. Especially in The New Way you come to see that. In The Gnostic Circle also, but in The New Way it is very clear, because there is this formula that I’ve given there — 9/6/3/0-, 0/1, and this includes the first two stages that they laid down, comprising the numbers 9 and 6. And then we go down the scale. So, it would be totally meaningless — well, it would have been impossible…I wouldn’t have been able to see a thing if they hadn’t come and done what they had to do. In the first place having been born when they were born. That is one of the main keys.

Often people say to me — you know, some people who don’t understand Sri Aurobindo and the Mother’s work — that they are disturbed by the fact that I do refer to them. But you see, it is impossible. They say, ‘Well why don’t you just leave it out and do your own thing’, so to speak. But that ‘thing’ would be meaningless without them. It’s a fourfold foundation, this is the important point. It has its cosmic harmony that is rooted in four cosmic principles. And it has to be. They represent two of those principles. So, it’s impossible to do otherwise.

And they also…their work corresponds to different levels of the being. We have the physical, the vital-emotional; we have the mental and then we have the spiritual. Those levels are also comprised in each section of the wheel. Notwithstanding that each time, each stage that we arrive at is complete in itself. All of these parts are present always and worked upon. But the emphasis or the angle from which each one works corresponds to either the physical or the vital, and so on; that’s the stress. And it corresponds also to world conditions; what it is in the world that is being worked upon.


…I’m a member of the Theosophical Society. And that is a very familiar concept to me: giving up the ego…when I first started [therapy] I was very happy to give up the ego, just kind of sit off on a cloud somewhere…But somehow that didn’t seem to be the way therapy work was going. It was more talking about ego development. I see a conflict in that….


I can understand this because in psychology the ego is one thing and in spiritual work it means a different thing. Usually in psychology it refers more to what we would consider to be the personality level, and that is quite different from the individuality, which is closer to what you seek to achieve in a spiritual path. Almost any of them. The ego in terms of the work that we do is just that element that isolates you, that…it is really a pivot of the being. It is a pivot unfortunately of our whole race, which simply means that you are an isolated entity working from a very egocentric point. You’re cut off from the whole. And this is a property of the whole race, you understand. So, it is very important at a certain point to understand this distinction because what it does, in almost any spiritual path,…it does not allow you to attain any sort of consciousness that is more universal, a cosmic consciousness for example, or to experience any of the…Samadhi, Nirvana, whatever. You see?

Now in this work we go further. There’s a framework here which is far more complete in the sense that you must deal with the personality also. The direction of this work is entirely different from all spiritual paths, as far as I know. Here the direction is Earthbound. You are to establish this new consciousness, this…as Sri Aurobindo called it, the ‘life divine’…upon Earth. So we have to deal with absolutely every aspect of life, and into that comes this development of the new pivot of the being that is not the ego and therefore that does not isolate you as an individual, but rather allows you to integrate and harmonise. To integrate. This is probably the fundamental point to discuss, because I think this is the main problem that we face. Everybody faces. And they don’t really understand the dimensions of it and what it requires to overcome this situation. It is something that has developed since man first began, you see? It is the pivot of the race, so it’s very difficult.

You know, there have been many experiences that allow us to feel that we have transcended that, and in certain aspects we have, spiritually. We have, we can disconnect ourselves from all of this, we can experience states of consciousness that are very far beyond, or that give us the impression of being totally egoless. On the human level there are certain times in our lives when we do touch that…moments of real loving, and so forth. But you always have to deal with this physical body which is structured in such a way that the pivot of our physical bodies right now is the ego, and it is located in the sex centre. So, what this means is simply that we have this atavistic drive there, and as a race we pivot that point.

Now this doesn’t mean that…it has nothing to do with sex as such, with the enjoyment of sex, or whatever. But it does have to do with the purpose of our coming into being, of our evolution. And this is the whole point. So, what has to happen now, and when people talk about a new consciousness, when they talk about the ‘new Earth’, the ‘second coming’, and Lord knows what…as far as I can see they really don’t understand the process. They don’t understand what it is that has to change. And not understanding that, usually there’s an undermining, constantly: they seek to attain this, and they end up over here, because not understanding the process, it is undermined constantly. They are doing things that would bring you to the opposite point, you see? Like for example a direction that is otherworldly in the quest…to go to heaven or to go out of the cosmos, extra-cosmic, — namely the Void, Nirvana, or any of those experiences. So, these undermine any possibility of establishing anything here. In fact, they fortify…they are experiences that have evolved precisely because it is an incomplete species.

You take for example the phrase, ‘the new heaven and the new earth’, in The Revelation. Well, that phrase alone is simply extraordinary in its import, and it happens to be also the phrase that we find in the very ancient texts, the Rig Veda: A new heaven and a new earth. Everybody understands that in their own way, but the important point there is: a new heaven; which means a totally new understanding of God, of the Absolute, the Higher Reality. So, what really does this imply, and this is where one must be very clear. The direction is completely different. In most paths, in every path, in every religion you are working on yourself in order to get out of this condition, and even in Buddhism, especially…in any path you take birth because you have to work out a karma. When you finally do that you are liberated and you don’t have to take birth any more. And so there we are, stuck with this problem. Now, these are all solutions based on a condition of incompletion, of a race that never really reached any higher development — physically, I’m talking about, which of course is based on Consciousness. But physically this is very important, you see.

So, when we talk about the Mother transforming her body, we are talking about a completely different poise which allows for an integration of every aspect of the being and which means then a shift in the whole pivot. We raise it from the sex centre to a higher position, and then everything changes, and every possibility becomes then possible. So this question of the ego is fundamental in this because all our solutions are based on this incomplete species, which has obviously come to a point where we cannot survive any longer as we are going. You see, there is an imbalance in the development. So what do we do with this imbalance? We are receiving these higher forces, these tremendous inspirations of…in technology. Just take technology. It is astounding what they are doing today. But it is clear that the consciousness has not followed that development, and so we are faced with what we are faced with. We are faced with a situation that…ah, we are going to end it all. Somehow, by hook or crook. And in the midst of all of that, however, comes this new creation. And this is the whole point of this work. To be able to see this rise of this new world in the midst of everything that is collapsing, because that is the way that it is taking place.

So, it is a very important point. The ego is something that has to be transcended now, but not abolished in the way that perhaps you may have experienced, where you let go. No, you’ve got to deal with it in ‘a new way’. You have to deal with your problems in a totally new way.

This is also a question of destiny. Some people are destined to do this work, which is very difficult in these stages, in this transitional period. Some are not. Some must come back again. It is basically the soul’s choice. But I think everybody, I think most people now are being brought to the point where they realise that all of these solutions have not worked. I mean the spiritual, the religious, the psychological; nothing is stopping this decay. Whereas we are all aware that people are becoming far more aware. In my travels now I am astounded to see how aware people are. They don’t have the answers perhaps, but they are aware, and they are informed, they are curious, they are asking questions. You know, it’s a very exciting moment in this respect. People are very ripe to really have this complete shift in the lens of their seeing; and to put everything into the right perspective.

So, what I can say about that is that this is the whole point of the ego. It is a question now of a completely new manifestation. And it is something that you just cannot even compare to the old thing, because the whole of our vision, of our past projections were from that condition of…I can’t say a wrong pivot, but of course it’s wrong in the context of what is developing now. But it was necessary for the time that it was used, and now we have to transcend that. We cannot just abolish it and say, ‘let’s let go!’ We have to say, ‘Well, now, what’s the higher truth?’ And then you come into something that is of course very interesting. You come to the point of…What is this Earth all about? What is meant to happen? What is this species for? Why is it evolving, and where is it going? Of course these are the questions that Sri Aurobindo touches when he brings in the whole point of the Supramental Creation, the gnostic being, which would be this new species that would ultimately take the place of the mental being.

When the ego is the pivot, it is not possible to have this complete balance, of all the parts of the being integrated. Therefore you have an imbalance and you have…generally it is the mind that dominates, which is the prominent power of our civilisation; which is the problem with all our technology. It is simply the mind gone wild, completely and absolutely enamoured of what it is discovering, and has no means to restrain itself any more. In order to really rectify this then, there must be a work that allows for this other element to manifest; and this is what we are involved in and what is actually taking place.

I don’t know if that has answered you. Do you have anything else to ask on this?


I’m wondering if nuclear war is inevitable, if we’re all just going to blow ourselves up and this little group is going to then take over.


Well, now we get into another very interesting example, especially since I have been travelling — and even when I was in India. You know, it’s the question: Who is going to be saved? [Laughter] Usually the people who are going to be saved…well, you don’t want to have anything to do with them. I’d rather go down under. [Laughter] If that’s the consciousness that is going to prevail…all these groups…what about the ones who are going to be lifted off the planet? You know, there is to be a shift in the axis of the Earth, and great catastrophes, so space ships are going to come and lift off certain select people. Well, all of this is really very childish. I mean, I have to say that though this work is involved with what is coming, and what we must…what we expect that will ultimately take the place of this, it is something that is developing right here and now. And so at that point it becomes rather immaterial. In fact, in my books I never deal with things like that: Well, we’re going to be saved. I don’t think I have ever even thought about it for a moment: whether I am going to be saved, or you, or whoever. It’s just totally irrelevant. The whole point is to do the Work. And that’s all. And then whatever is to be will be, whoever is to enjoy it…Because you see, it is all wrong positioning. It is an enjoyment of EACH MOMENT. I think this is the most exciting time to be alive! In ten thousand years it couldn’t have been better! [Laughter]


Have you been to New York City lately? [Laughter]


No, but I was in 1981, and I said, this is Babylon…This is Babylon. Really I had an extraordinary experience…it was like a cathedral. It was extraordinary. It was this Money God, I mean the real POWER behind money — power in the occult sense, you know, not in terms of what money power can buy. In the occult sense, what money means really, the energy…And there it was. And I said, ‘Well, if anything happens here, the collapse of this is going to be really enough to reach the centre of the Earth.’ You know, the caving in…but a very exciting place at the same time. And I felt at that time…I said, ‘I have something to do here. I just hope and pray that it doesn’t mean living here.’ [Laughter]

Now that’s another point. You see, we’re all concerned now about this problem, especially people who have children, and see that in their lifetimes, and probably our own, but in their lifetimes certainly — well, I would say within the next 15 years at the most, probably before the turn of the century — either there is a solution found, or we have to play it out to the hilt. But, the way I have seen this Force work, operate in the world, it has such a total control over everything. So total that it seems to me rather that it’s going to be, again, a very controlled process that will not be totally destructive, as such, but will be very clearly leading toward this new world, this new creation.

A very big destruction? I just don’t think that that is the way, that that is really necessary. And I think really that more or less what happens is that these things just sort of cave in on themselves, destroy themselves. You can see what is happening around. It is really a caving-in process constantly. And that’s the process that takes place in each body, each human body. So, we are really playing it out in the world as it is in each physical body where, because of this pivot, as I mentioned — in the sex centre — there is a void at the centre of the human being, and that is the void that just consumes these energies. And that is the definition of mortality, why we cannot regenerate our bodies. You can see that also this is something very interesting because there is so much concern now with the physical.


I think also the concern with transplanting organs and keeping everybody alive.

That’s kind of useless, isn’t it?


Well, I think the really important work being done now is the question of prolonging life. Not necessarily by transplanting organs but genetically, by trying to find out how we age, why we age. I think that that is the point. Because the way I have been able to see it — at a certain point in my own work, my own yoga — was that the question of a certain extended lifespan is very necessary, in order to do this particular work, to be able to see this transformation process through; and that for the time being I’m sure that will happen. We already are extending [the lifespan]. If you look at it, at the turn of the century the lifespan must have been, what, 50, 45 years old? Probably the average. And now it’s into the 70’s. Usually a person now dies in the 80’s, when [it is] anything less than that you think something is really wrong. Especially in the United States. So, I think that this is a very important part of the Work as it is being experienced on the mass level, unconsciously. These signs are very clear and they do correspond to needs…in order to carry out such a work, to extend life, to be able to complete a work.

And now this, for example you can see it now, those of you who have looked into the Gnostic Circle…there are these cycles. Well, what usually happens then, when a person is working on him or herself, and if you have the Gnostic Circle as the backdrop when you are studying these cycles…what usually happens is that there are key points that are missed in the process; which means that, for example, there are certain pressures that occur in life, certain tensions that tend to close you in and create a condition in which there is an immense amount of pressure. And at those points, what happens is that in order to escape that pressure…that’s precisely what we do: we escape, we find some way out. Ordinary psychology I think knows this abundantly. All right, and what happens is that you go on like that and you go through these cycles, and your time runs out. Quite simply. There is no time left to deal with it, because, you see, if you don’t do a certain work by a certain age, crusts come up; and then in order to be able to reach very profound levels, very deep levels, there are these crusts and this force then has to create such pressures that, by a certain point, physically you cannot sustain it any longer.

So, you know, if a person is very perceptive, and you’re following the development of someone over a long period, you can see the point where this person steps out of any higher possibility. I mean ‘higher’ in terms of this complete work. And you see it, and you see that it is no longer possible, because in order to be able to carry that person through, so much pressure would be needed as to bring about death. Because it would be physically impossible to sustain this. Therefore, when we talk about an extended lifespan, this becomes very important in the context of work like this. Because, you see, your lifespan is a totality. If you’re meant to die at 90, this exists already. I mean, it’s sort of programmed in your soul and your cells, let’s say. So, you have a halfway point at 45, you understand. And that would be a very critical point. If it happens to be at 72, well your halfway point would be at 36. These would be crucial points. Now, you don’t need to know the totality of your lifespan, but if you are very sensitive you can feel in your own life when you come to really important, the important crossroads.

Now, the ordinary person lives like this, but usually people that are doing some amount of work on themselves, keep themselves supple enough to be able to continue benefiting. But a lot of people of course do not at all. And they are caught in what is called that eternal hell. They just go round and round, round and round, and never really develop beyond a certain point. They can enjoy life more, but in the context of really what the destiny of the Earth is all about, and the participation of each individual, it is almost meaningless.

Now, if you don’t know it, it really doesn’t matter. But when you begin to perceive these things, then it becomes very important to be very aware, and very conscious of the state that you are in, what pressures, why those pressures are acting upon you. And to stand up to it, you see, in the right poise..

 


The ideal would be to start when you’re very young, so that you’d have 50, 60 years then to do it.


Exactly. Well, look at what is happening now. Look at the young people. A lot of them are of course being destroyed by what is happening, but they are also so aware. Even at 10, 12…and the things that they ask you, the general awareness.


And yet the pressures on teenagers in this country are almost unbearable if they are very sensitive.


You see, for the same reason, because these are, — let’s call them cosmic forces that are acting, that are stirring up things, injecting all this into the ‘pot’, you see. And so, there’s a saying in Italian, Si salva chi puo! Who can save themselves, save themselves. Those are the sort of sacrifices along the way. Because when you get to a certain point you look at these things as sort of universal movements. You understand? You see ‘teenagers in the United States’. Period. And you don’t see individuals. You see that all of them — the ones that have fallen, and the ones that…all are being carried by a ‘force’ that is carrying out a process.

So, it is very important. They are aware of things that…I mean, just the drug situation. Let’s stop there. That’s sufficient enough to see what a dilemma they face. But on the other hand, out of that there will come this group that starts very young and has a greater possibility to do the complete work.


Also, some yogas I have studied say that if you pass on and then come back, reincarnate, you begin again at the level you attained in the previous incarnation. So in that sense, wouldn’t we have an endless amount of time to do the work?


Of course, that we must always consider. As I say, we must look at the universal force working; you also have to look at the larger endless cycles of your life. But there I must say that we do, in this respect, have a rather immature understanding of karma and reincarnation. So immature that I say, well finally it’s best to leave it alone. You see, we always project. We look at it from a moral standpoint. This is good. This is bad. I do this bad deed, I’m going to get paid in this way. And frankly, in the Divine Consciousness there is no such perception. Things are harmonious or disharmonious; or those very ‘bad’ acts may be the very things that do make you make a progress.

Now, I’m not saying by this that…I’m not condoning these activities, because that’s the whole point. It is to become aware, conscious. What I am saying is that we are projecting onto the Divine our very limited mental…And you look at the universe. Where is the morality in the universe? The whole process of life, this whole creative and destructive process certainly doesn’t take into consideration the individual prayers. And yet it does too. Of course every one of us has had the experience where you’re in a dilemma and you…you PRAY. And you get an answer. So, in that sense of course on the personal level there IS a response. There is a personal God, as the Hindus know quite well. There are all these different levels.

But, I find that generally all of this is very immature, spiritually immature. We’re projecting onto the Divine our mental formula, which is based on Good and Evil.


Is it true that if you don’t accept the idea of karma, then you don’t have to play it out? That karma only exists if it exists for you in your mind.


Well, I wouldn’t say that, but what I would say is that the entire process changes when you are aware of it. For example, when you are doing yoga. Now, I think almost everybody has had this experience. You feel, you experience an acceleration of what would normally be called karma. In other words, you do an act and right away…you do it in the morning and in the afternoon — WHAM! It comes right back at you. And this is one of the most important, one of the most positive aspects of doing a serious work on oneself. That this begins to happen. And so, what does it mean? Any of you who have been through psychotherapy know that in order to find the root cause of whatever it is that you are working on today, my gosh, you’ve got to dig and dig and dig; because you’ve lost the thread in between.

So, in processes of yoga, you accelerate that. And there’s a force working to show you very clearly, right away, the connection. This is also necessary. And this makes it possible to deal with the problems, to find the roots; and of course then to solve them.

In a way it is true. Of course if you don’t pay attention to it, it doesn’t exist. But you’re the loser in the process, because you are not taking advantage of…I mean, it is the same thing as saying, ‘All of this is illusion, and it really doesn’t exist.’ Well, you can live in that consciousness, and then it is illusion for you, and you miss out on the beauty of certain things that this manifestation in matter represents. Of course it is the attitude that you have toward it. But that doesn’t mean that the universe really doesn’t exist; it means that you believe that it doesn’t exist, and that’s the basis of your life.

I firmly believe that what you do now is very important and has an effect. I just mean that what we consider ‘good’, what we consider ‘evil’, all of these are simply projections from our incomplete condition. That’s all. And that when it starts changing, when that shifts a bit, you really look at things and say, ‘Well, that was really very infantile, all of those ideas.’

And yet of course at certain stages of your life, of your development, it can be very important to believe that. It can help a lot of people to understand themselves, their motivations. The problem with believing in reincarnation…is this delegation of responsibility: to the past, or to the future. A lot of people indulge in that, though they believe they do not. You know…because I did this in the past, that’s why…. And then suddenly they are relieved of the problem. But they really haven’t dealt with it, you see. And I find that this is one of the most damaging aspects. So that’s why I really don’t deal with it too much.

In the third volume of The New Way which is in press now, I have gone into karma very extensively, but for a totally different reason, because I’m interested in the collective web of karma. How it is that this has come about. You see, it is very interesting because finally you come to the point where you realise that if you change one item of one individual, you really are affecting the whole. Negatively or positively. In other words, our world is what it is because we all sustain it. I’m sure that all of us realise that now. Just a little bit of work on yourself, you realise that your state of consciousness is affecting the totality. But the point is, here again, how is this mechanism sustained, and what does it mean to sustain it, and what does it mean…that we must obliterate this cosmic web entirely, this karmic web? Or establish a new one? You see? So I am interested in this mechanism, and for that you have to come to terms with the individual in the collectivity, to find how this works.

I am interested also in the question of undoing the past karma, and how an individual does that, what really is the almost ‘physical’ mechanism that abolishes it. This has to do with time: the past, present and the future. It has to do also with the incomplete condition of the being, with the wrong pivot, which accumulates a sediment. I see it physically. I see it as a physical sediment that weighs you down, that creates that pivot in the sex centre. And this has to do with incomplete living, in the present…then the past becomes, as I say, like a sediment. It condenses there and pins you down to what in certain paths they would call ‘the lower nature’, and to be nailed to that cross, you see. And this had to do with the experience in time.

Now, you cannot deal with this unless you accept time, first of all, as part and parcel of the spiritual experience. And this is another problem, because people usually don’t. Since you’re dealing with experiences in time and time energy, if you don’t accept that to begin with and you say, ‘Well, it’s all illusion and it doesn’t exist and let’s go beyond it’, again you cannot solve it. You can save yourself individually in the same sense that if you don’t pay attention to your karma it doesn’t exist. But that does nothing to change anything here. And I think that really mature people, I mean spiritually aware, let’s say, have reached the point where we obviously do want to change things here. One would have to be really insensitive not to understand that…we have a certain responsibility. And we have to do something. The question is how, what, and for what purpose.


Would you say something about what you mean when you talk about ‘working on ourselves’.


Well, I just mean that…most people who are undergoing psychotherapy consider that they are working on themselves for a certain transformation, to become more aware, more conscious. I use that term because I often refer to this as ‘a work’, and I say ‘work on oneself’. In India we would call it yoga, doing yoga. So…Is that what you’re asking? Or are you asking, what is this?


Yes, more or less. But I feel there’s a concept behind what you’re saying, namely, awareness; getting more aware, getting conscious. Isn’t that the work?


Yes, of course.


Is that the whole work?


No, no, because…you have many paths that bring you to that point. They’re engaged in this process. The difference is that you must be aware or become conscious on many different levels. They transcend. And, you know, this is what I consider to be one of the most damaging legacies of spirituality, as we know it. It is this problem, because in order to be able to open people to this possibility that there is a different process, ‘a new way’, something else, there’s a lot of resistance. You see, it is very easy then to label all these things as ‘unspiritual’; you don’t want to deal with them. I’ve found, for example, a very great conflict in people in terms of carrying on with their ordinary lives, their ordinary work, and also a so-called spiritual discipline. Just recently I experienced it very profoundly, with someone who really could not reconcile these two things. Though this person thought she was, or probably thought she was. But of course she was in conflict. And I could see the conflict very clearly. I don’t think she saw it at all; but I saw it very clearly. The problem is that there is no possibility of integrating all this. So for her — and she was following an Indian path — well, it was: spirituality is one thing, and it’s in an ashram, or it’s in this and that…and here I have to do this kind of work which seems to be in total conflict.

So, I have found this all over to be the problem. And I’ve also understood that no more is there a solution in a monastery or an ashram, or whatever. That this really is irrelevant. Now what is important is something entirely different. This means a ‘centre’, where a particular type and quantity of energies are gathered, in order to be able to do a particular work. And that is to create a microcosm, which, because of this interesting way in which a certain amount of energies are brought together, you can work on the whole. This doesn’t require great numbers…. And, another thing, it requires a certain environment, in which you are dealing with life, as it is, you see. Now, in strict ashrams or monasteries, of course it is entirely different. An atmosphere is created which is completely contrary to the life we lead in the world. So, this I feel has come to an end. A lot of the collapses of these ashrams that we’re witnessing now are due largely to this. But finally, that’s not the answer. People come out of them, they cannot cope really. And they cannot cope in the sense that they have not even found the other yet, you see? Because this is of course the tragedy of it. They haven’t found one and they cannot survive in the other.


Yes, I see that in the case of certain individuals it is sort of tragic.


Yes, it is. So, in terms of my own work — I have to speak from the standpoint of this work — this is the process that has been followed. We have always had a certain amount of individuals gathered together who represented particular ‘knots’, and those ‘knots’ had to be unraveled. But when you unraveled it, you unraveled it for the whole. You were establishing something that could then serve as a blueprint.


Like group therapy?


Well, in fact it is just like that. Of course it is a group therapy, with a lot of the experiences that you might experience in group therapy, of the psychological level, with the difference that it is put into a larger context.


For more than the group.


Yes, that work cannot be done unless you have the larger perspective, the total vision. Otherwise it falls through. It’s precisely the question: you’re not there to work on yourself, isolated. You are there to work on yourself, others, and to form this integrated system.


In other words, you can start serving before you’re perfect.


Oh, of course. That is the whole point. You have hit upon something else: this whole question of utopias, let’s say, working toward a.…This is again ludicrous, because, you see, in this work you are really not working toward, you are working as you say, you are serving in your mixed-up condition, as it is. But provided you are aware. Now, usually people are not; because when they are in that state they are living in the ego, completely closed off, so they see themselves as the centre of the universe. And then they don’t benefit by it. It is very amusing to see. It is amazing. Of course for the person it’s rather tragic, but I always consider it rather amusing to see people in that state. You say, ‘My God, if they could only see what they are contributing.’

This is very important, what you say. You are serving in your process of development, very specifically. Well, there again, provided that you’re working with someone who is aware; or that you are able to have this awareness in your daily living, your interaction with everybody. That’s a tall order. But that is ultimately the purpose of a book like The Gnostic Circle, in which you are to apply it. It is completely useless for me to tell you: This is how it works, this is what it means in your life. I can say, ‘Yes, this is how it works mechanically. This is it.’ But you must apply that in your own life because the Gnostic Circle is something that you grow into. You grow into the understanding of it. So, if you take it [the book] up today and you read it and you say, ‘Well, I really don’t understand this.’ But that’s sitting there. Even just the diagram. It is sitting in you, and that is working on you. And then you’re going to pick it up later on and you’re going to be at a different level of understanding. So you are growing into that ‘blueprint’. It is really a blueprint of the new consciousness.


It’s not an intellectual process.


No.


I loved the beginning of THE GNOSTIC CIRCLE when you talked about the purpose now being to divinise the material. And for me that encapsulated exactly what I felt was the direction I needed to go, because I had also been involved with teachings which kept on focusing on the Transcendent. You know, transcend suffering, transcend everything. Just shoot yourself right out there into the soul world. And it wasn’t enough…


It left too much unresolved and unexplained. This is the point: then WHY? What is this all about? Because ultimately that’s what you ask.


Yes. I also wanted to ask, what does the work teach about what happens to the souls who, for whatever reasons, do not come to participate in the last circle, and does the Earth go through this greater circle more than once? Is this cycle also something that continues? So that souls at different levels of evolution would enter the cycle at different points?


Yes.


And ultimately all souls will move toward that…manifesting, operating from the higher centre…the higher pivot point.


Yes, of course. This changes constantly, in the sense that the more conscious you are of the process, you will be seeing it entirely differently. This question of recurrence, this becomes very different as the consciousness changes and widens. But basically that is what it is: these recurring cycles. Like the Gnostic Circle…just like your own life. You start at zero years and you go on, and you complete a cycle at 9, and one again at 18, and it goes on and on. At a certain point you step out of that wheel. You step out of this vision of Time as seen from this point, this solar system, let’s say. You step out of it and of course you come back in again. Now, there will be a point, though, when you come back very conscious of the process. Right now you cannot because we are living in this condition of ignorance. You couldn’t possibly bring that burden back in again. Otherwise you would not be able to survive. At a certain point though, death as well as birth becomes far more conscious. There are signs of that already happening now…people becoming more conscious; all this emphasis now on these near-death experiences. All these things that are taking place; another indication that people are realising…. They are not realising, they are just carried along by a movement. People are beginning to have these experiences, and isn’t it interesting that suddenly you’ve got books written on everybody’s near-death experience. You see, this is simply indicating this greater consciousness in death and in birth ultimately. And so, the cycle goes on. Your development continues. But again, there it is: it is a memory that is contained in the soul. It’s not a ‘memory’. It is a condition of being. You come back in a condition of being; and there is no memory as such. You ARE that BECAUSE of your past development; and you start from that point again, unburdened by the outer layers of the physical, vital, memory, and of course the mental memory, which would be an unbearable burden.

So, it is a recurring process. And of course in the Gnostic Circle what is important to understand is that this is now a vision of a complete, total development. Whereas what we usually do…. You know, you have your 12 and 9 superimposed. So, one is the signs of the Zodiac, let’s say the ‘space dimension’, this horizontal dimension. Then you have the ‘vertical’ which is the 9, the 9 planets, and our number system, and time, and how we measure time. But you see, as a race, most people only get to the 6 point, or the 8th level, which is Scorpio, and that is the sign of Death, as any astrologer will be able to tell you. And that’s where we end the wheel. So, the rest, that slice of the circle, is non-existent in terms of the lived experience of the human being. And this corresponds also to that void that I was describing. We just ‘cave in’. So you can just visualise it. You see, you make a circle and you come…and at the point where you are ready to get into a higher possibility, the pressures become so intense that you find a way of escape from those pressures, and you slip out and you fall back again; you never really attain this. The rest of the wheel, let’s say, is experienced unconsciously. Now, it doesn’t mean that your time stops. It means that that particular heightened consciousness that would allow you to then live the total circle is non-existent because you have ‘copped out’. You see?


What does that mean, to live the rest of the circle?


You see, your time goes on. In other words, let’s say a person is 24 years old, which is the 6 point. The pressures there become very intense at a certain point. All right. Now, time is going to continue. He is going to be 25, and then 26 and 27. You are living that process in time. But, let’s say psychologically or spiritually you are not, because you have not accepted that more total state at the point where you should have, and this is what I mean by the ‘crusts’ coming in. Each point that you miss in that condition creates stronger barriers. And then finally, yes, you go on, you’re living out your time; but you are living it out as a pygmy — as a spiritual pygmy. You are undermining all the time. There is a caving in of energy. You see? So the point in all of this then is this total awareness and this poising of the consciousness in such a way that at each moment this process, this caving in, this escape is no longer possible; until finally the total integrated being comes about.

So, you are experiencing all the ages of your life, all the cycles; but you are experiencing them at, let’s say, half of your potential. Usually even less. But in any case, this must be taken always in the context of the total human species. The instruments that we are only provide for so much. And the exciting work that we’re involved in, what we are witnessing, is that we can see this. And we can see now the ‘seeds’; and from this we can see the formation of the new thing, and realise, Yes, that’s it.


Up to this point it hasn’t been possible for individuals to have completed the entire circle, until your realisation and your work.


No, and it is because it involves world conditions, you understand? It’s not…. We are talking — and this is what people really fail to understand, because we have been so focused on individual solutions all the time — we are a species. Why are we in these bodies? You understand? I mean, is it just to get out of them? The whole thing is rather senseless.


To come into a human body and the whole point is to get back where we were. It doesn’t make any sense.


But at the same time, as I was saying, now we have this marvellous condition where we can perceive clearly what it is that is really going on, what’s behind it. And why? And that is because the world conditions now have reached the point where.… These are the tensions! You understand? As a species. So imagine it as something caving in, caving in.… Well, as a species there is this thing coming down upon us. Now, the escape is: blow ourselves to bits. That’s the escape. But you see, you understand that it’s the same process for an individual. In your life, the circumstances of your life are oppressive, oppressive, oppressive, and when they become too much, you take a drug, or take a new lover, or who knows what! And you get out of it for a time, and you come back again, you repeat the same…. You will see, if you are very perceptive when you are working with the Gnostic Circle, you will see that when you come back to the same points, almost the same conditions prevail. They are apparently different, and that’s how they fool you, you see? But they are the same conditions; in other words to create the same amount of tension and pressure. And then what happens is you escape. As I say, as a civilisation the same thing. So, these pressures are coming in, and what are we going to do? Everybody says, ‘Well, there’s no way out, we’re just going to be blown to bits.’ Obviously there doesn’t seem to be any solution. But then there is a solution in the sense that a core survives…and it’s going through the process that is not experiencing escape because it says: It is to be established here, on Earth, in the physical body, in matter. And so, it withstands this pressure and it does not accept the escape of Nirvana, of the Void, of Samadhi.…

You see, this is the main key. Because you cannot…this Core has never been formed as a collective group. It must be a collectivity who does this. It cannot be any longer an individual solution. So, in order to get that core one has to reject any possibility that gives you a way out. And this is the point, you see. And then to do that, of course it is very difficult. And at the same time it is a glorious experience because it is so immensely beautiful, what is happening…so immensely beautiful.


I’m a little confused about this…shifting of the pivot. Are you saying that we in this room could consciously or sub-consciously do some kind of work and we’d shift our own pivot?


Of course. That’s the whole point.


It is? Because when I was reading I got to a point in The Gnostic Circle, and it was like — I don’t know if you saw the film ‘Star Man’, but it was like…it was like science fiction. This ‘gnostic being’, this ‘being’ coming, super-intelligent…and not, I mean sex was not…


No, this is an evolutionary process. Evolution. It comes from this. I mean, it is not going to descend.


But you’re saying that we can evolve ourselves. And I was thinking that only in many hundreds of years that this gnostic being will come.


Now wait a minute. Of course, that’s a different thing. What you would call the Age of Truth, the Satya Yuga as they call it in India, where they consider that the Earth is to be populated by Gods. That’s of course a different thing. Well, it’s not different. It is what we are working to establish, but there is something that is established right now. The particular stage that we are at in this cycle of the Ages, this Aquarian Age right now, is that we are creating a ‘nucleus’. We are planting the ‘seeds’ right now. So, yes, you definitely can do this. It doesn’t mean that physically you’re going to transform your body, which was the problem with the Mother, when people were projecting this onto the Mother, about her changing her cells. Yes, the work was being done, but it didn’t mean that physically she was going to walk in the room as a 16 year old when she was 95. But she was doing that.

Now, it depends on how deeply you see. So, in your own life you have to be able to perceive that. And this is what you must be engaged in if you are an intelligent person. You don’t want to accept the old solutions. You just say No. And you’ll see how the force works in your life to be able to present this completely other solution that we haven’t ever dealt with before.

Yes, it is something that is going to grow — constantly. You have to look at it like this: it’s a constant manifestation of a perfection that is. If you see the perfection that is at each moment, that doesn’t mean you don’t see the dynamic aspect. This ‘thing’ is perfect in its seed. And it grows. And so it increases, and this we are able to perceive. And it goes on and on and on and on and on…I mean, there is no end to this. We are only at the beginning really. Just like Sri Aurobindo’s work. That was only the mere beginning. Most people take it as an end: Sri Aurobindo left his body, and that’s the end of it. He planted a seed that he had not even given the full details of. He gave this vision like this [gesture of vastness], and that is a part of the ingredients of this ‘core’.

So, you can be very aware of the process that you’re living. And you can be aware by the present conditions in the world that force you to see in your own individual life; and you have a possibility of something else. And that’s your responsibility, it is to find the way to that…


And that’s the tough part….


Another misconception here is the question, ‘Oh, we have to give up so much.’ Now, I don’t want you to misconstrue and think I’m on the bandwagon of: ‘Enjoy yourself to the hilt!’ and all of that, because ‘everything goes’ and ‘it’s all part of the Divine.’ That’s really not the point. What does happen though is that as you evolve, of course things simply fall away. And that’s all. That’s the process. And that brings us to an interesting point regarding the shift of the pivot from the sex centre. Well, now, you see, we’ve been dealing with sex all wrong. From 5000 years at least, we’ve been on the wrong.… Certainly in our times, in this Manifestation; let’s say from 2000, 3000 years ago, something began to go really haywire in this situation. So you indulge or you abstain. And you do nothing to change that condition of being, really. Now this is the ironic thing, because we’ve devised so many systems, and finally now we’ve come to the point where there is this outrageous license…. And with all these remarkable manifestations of Herpes and AIDS and whatnot. It is really something very interesting that has happened.

But then, on the other hand, of course you have no solution in suppression and oppression. And so, what is the answer? You’re all the more nailed to that cross by these solutions. So, the solution is not to deal with that sex pivot at all: Create the higher one. And the other simply goes…

That’s just to give you an example of the problem that has been faced all along: a vision that is incomplete can only give incomplete solutions. Temporary solutions.
So, everything will change. You know, really, ‘All things made new’, is the biblical saying in The Revelation: All things made new.


In that connection, would you say that the spirit of Herpes and AIDS are like plagues of the second chakra?


I think that they’re just the logical result of people exposing themselves, in ways that they don’t understand. Unconscious processes are going on and these diseases are simply manifestations of very unconscious forces, energies that have taken these forms and that people have allowed — you know, because before we were keeping it under, keeping it suppressed. And so I see illness in that way. This is really a form of Consciousness — a twisted form of Consciousness involving the physical. And these are simply manifestations. You know, when everybody says, ‘Well, I’m sexually free, now I can do what I like’, you are liberating…not liberating. You are letting off, opening a Pandora’s box, and if you don’t know what you’re dealing with…. Now, individually you can do this and nothing much happens. But, again, when it becomes a collective movement, then the problems start, because you are creating, really, a new form. This is really what it is.

Again, it is not moralistic in any way. It is no plague being inflicted. It’s simply the logical result of this kind of behaviour. But behaviour in terms of unconscious exposing. I’ve written something about AIDS in that respect. And, I don’t know how aware people are, why they don’t see that this developed at the same time that homosexuals came out in the open. So, it is simply not possible to not see this, because it is a fact. They came out in the open, then AIDS came at the same time. Clearly you are dealing here with something that was released by this process, that was very unconscious — which I consider to be the guilt that was involved. Especially in Christian society. So, this simply takes a ‘form’. Now, I think if you go into illness, health, all of this in a certain way, you will see of course… what is an illness? You’re dealing again with physical substances really. And so, the basis of it is always consciousness. That is the ‘stuff’ of which all of this is made. You twist it this way, you twist it that way, and you get a ‘form’. It throws up different forms. I can’t go along with it in the sense of…this is a chastisement, a punishment. Again that’s really the ‘good and evil’, the moralistic way of looking at it. It is simply logical: You expose yourself. That’s fine. But then you have to accept what happens.


You’re saying that this is a manifestation of suppressed guilt?


Yes, of course. And look at the type of illness: this question of a breakdown of the immune system. They are vulnerable to everything and anything. And this is exactly what happened. Well, then you have to face it, you see.

Now, what is this going to level off to? That is the important question.


Some people have said that this is going to be like a plague that wipes out half of humanity.


We have a lot of guilt, an awful lot of guilt. So I wouldn’t doubt it! Of course. I mean, it could very well be, in that sense: that you know that our Judeo-Christian society is plagued by guilt. It’s not plagued by AIDS or Herpes, or whatever. It is plagued by guilt. Now, again, there we go. How does psychology deal with it? Well…free love, free whatever! Free sex — and that solves the problem.

Not in the least. And so, it only takes this form now because they really haven’t solved the problem of guilt, which had its roots in something entirely different.

That’s the point: what is at the root of the problem? Where, I mean, how did this arise? Why is it a religion that centres on guilt? How did this come about? What are the seeds of that, you see? And of course this is the whole of our society. The Orient is a little bit free of that, but it constantly is overtaken by these waves too, because again, you see, it is no longer isolated. It’s a global thing. It’s our whole civilisation really that is living out something.


Western civilisation?


No. Civilisation in general. We are living out something very important that has to do with everything we have talked about here.


Would it be our guilt that’s calling upon us all of these destructive forces that are in the world today?


Yes, but maybe not calling upon…but it is simply the logical result. You know, it’s not that you are calling, but…there again, the true idea of karma: you do this and then it’s going to come out like that.


It is not just guilt though. And the teaching is, I think to the degree I understand it, is that we are at a time right now where there has to be a certain amount of destruction and dissolution of the old, in order to prepare for the new, I mean, that’s just part of the cycle.


Exactly. That is the whole point. That is what I say: every moment is a perfection. Even in our ignorance. You know, when you really perceive the Divine, when you identify with that, in every moment…it is something just glorious. Because, you see each perfection of each moment. Yes, of course, you cannot live in that consciousness always because you’ve got to deal with the working out process. We are here to do that. So of course you have to come back and deal with the negative things. And you can’t say, ‘Well, no it is all God, it’s all the Divine, it’s all perfect’ — which is what a lot of people have done, as a solution. It isn’t. I mean, you have to respect the Being and the Becoming. And this is another key of this work.

I was just reading the latest book of Krishnamurti and David Bohm — a conversation. There you are going to find exactly the contrary: Becoming is like a mortal sin. So, then I say, what solution, when you start saying that there is no becoming at all? Then it is really a joke — because then what are we doing here? Then really there’s no purpose, no sense to it.


*********

Expansion and Structuring

In mid-1984 the work at the Aeon Centre of Cosmology in Kodaikanal, India took a decisive turn indicating that the moment for expansion had come. A reversal of consciousness in the collective yoga transpired, a process akin to the formation of a solar system. Elements of this ‘system’ had matured, or had found their correct poise in relation to each other and to the centre. In terms of the applied cosmology which is the main work of the Aeon Centre of Cosmology, the ‘planets’ were then in correct orbit around the ‘sun’.

As the Aeon Centre of Cosmology took shape, the expansion process also called for the establishment of an organisation representing and promoting the research of the Centre, outside of India. Given the close destiny ties between India and America, it was natural that Vishaal, the vehicle created for this purpose, was located in America. The office began its work in September of 1984. Its location in upstate New York was clearly indicated when housing was offered in the very community where Vivekananda had been a guest many years before during his mission to the West. In fact, the estate of his benefactors, where he rested and met with students, is less than a mile from the Vishaal office.

Vivekananda’s role in Sri Aurobindo’s spiritual development has been acknowledged by him in the following passage: ‘…The voice [of Vivekananda] spoke only on a special and limited but very important field of spiritual experience and it ceased as soon as it had finished saying all that it had to say on that subject.’ (CE, Vol. 26, page 68.) To this day we feel a spiritual bond with Vivekananda and his Guru, Ramakrishna. Their work served to prepare the ground for Sri Aurobindo both in India and the West. Many of Vivekananda’s observations about America remain relevant today, and his experiences in Europe and America and the repercussions of his teaching among certain Hindu sects in India have served to unsettle old attitudes about the spiritual life and its conduct in the world.

Since its inception Vishaal has been able to expand the distribution of Aeon Books and to put many people in touch with Patrizia Norelli-Bachelet’s yogic work. In October 1985 we began publication of The Vishaal Newsletter, a vehicle that permits a closer and more frequent contact with students of the new way, the third stage in the establishment of Sri Aurobindo’s vision. The Newsletter is offered to a world wide audience with the deep hope of bringing Eastern and Western thought into harmony and revealing more fully the new consciousness that is emerging and making itself felt in world affairs.

Sri Aurobindo’s presentation of the guiding principles of ‘Arya’, the journal that published his major works in the second decade of this century, are equally appropriate to our effort today in bringing out The Vishaal Newsletter. The dichotomy Sri Aurobindo discusses in the following passage is still present. However, where our experience differs is in the dramatic world conditions which demand a more earnest dedication in order to bring about the harmony of spirit and matter Sri Aurobindo saw as an imperative necessity. The Vishaal Newsletter, like the ‘Arya’, seeks to be an organ for this fundamental change.

‘…Our idea was the thinking out of a synthetic philosophy which might be a contribution to the thought of the new age that is coming upon us. We start from the idea that humanity is moving to a great change of its life which will even lead to a new life of the race, – in all countries where men think, there is now in various forms that idea and that hope, – and our aim has been to search for the spiritual, religious and other truth which can enlighten and guide the race in this movement and endeavour…

‘Our original intention was to approach the synthesis from the starting-point of the two lines of culture which divide human thought and are now meeting at its apex, the knowledge of the West and the knowledge of the East; but owing to the exigencies of the war [1914] this could not be fulfilled. The ‘Arya’ except for one unfinished series has been an approach to the highest reconciling truth from the point of view of the Indian mentality and Indian spiritual experience, and Western knowledge has been viewed from that standpoint. Here the main idea which has governed our writing, was imposed on us by the very conditions of the problem. All philosophy is concerned with the relations between two things, the fundamental truth of existence and the forms in which existence presents itself to our experience. The deepest experience shows that the fundamental truth is truth of the Spirit; the other is the truth of life, truth of form and shaping force and living idea and action. Here the West and East have followed divergent lines. The West has laid most emphasis on truth of life and for a time come to stake its whole existence upon truth of life alone, to deny the existence of Spirit or to relegate it to the domain of the unknown and unknowable; from that exaggeration it is now beginning to return. The East has laid most emphasis on truth of the Spirit and for a time came, at least in India, to stake its whole existence upon that truth alone, to neglect the possibilities of life or to limit it to a narrow development or a fixed status; the East too is beginning to return from this exaggeration. The West is reawakening to the truth of the Spirit and the spiritual possibilities of life, the East is reawakening to the truth of Life and tends towards a new application to it of its spiritual knowledge. Our view is that the antinomy created between them is an unreal one. Spirit being the fundamental truth of existence, life can be only its manifestation; Spirit must be not only the origin of life but its basis, its pervading reality and its highest and total result. But the forms of life as they appear to us are at once its disguises and its instruments of self-manifestation. Man has to grow in knowledge till they cease to be disguises and grow in spiritual power and quality till they become in him its perfect instruments. To grow into the fullness of the divine is the true law of human life and to shape his earthly existence into its image is the meaning of his evolution. This is the fundamental tenet of the philosophy of the ‘Arya’.’

(CE, Vol. 17, pages 399-401.)

Along with book distribution and publication of The Vishaal Newsletter, we have been giving legal form to our organisation, both in India and in America. Aeon Trust, in India, was registered on 27 March, 1986. A few days later, in America, Aeon Group, a Corporation for Spiritual Renaissance, was granted non-profit status, on 3 April, 1986. These twin organisations are intended to serve the Aeon Centre of Cosmology, to give support to the facility and to make the research of its Director, Patrizia Norelli-Bachelet, widely available. Both organisations are supported solely by contributions and we expect to be able to offer donors tax exemption before long.

In early 1986, a handsome contribution enabled the purchase of land that will be the permanent location of the Aeon Centre of Cosmology. The property is located 18kms. from Kodaikanal in an area with an ancient sacred tradition.  The significance of the site and its meaning in the establishment of a new consciousness will be discussed in detail by Patrizia Norelli-Bachelet in a forthcoming article. At the present time work is being carried out there developing the land, putting in a road and preparing for the construction of housing. This is an unusual opportunity to assist in the building of a new centre, and we hope that supporters of its work will come forward at this time.

In closing I would like to mention that while Vivekananda lived at Ridgely Manor, he planted a tree known locally as the ‘prophet’s tree’. Need I add that this splendid white pine is flourishing today.


The Editor