arinaya wrote:

harimalla wrote:

Dear Mr.Arinaya, How do we know that there is precession.of the equinoxes? Is it not with reference to the star background.? Agreed that there is no  solstices and equinoxes in the sidereal zodiacs. Netherless is it not, on the background of fixed stars, that we see the motion of solstices and equinoxes of the…

[Read more]

Dear Jc,

Cool… I am expecting all these outbursts.. so I am cooler inside. Look at another emotional outburst by you.

Did you expect me to reply to Ms. Thea without reading what she wrote. I think that would have been just an emotional reaction to an emotional starting action….and would not have been fair to her.

Instead of all these bad fee…[Read more]

tim wrote:

The gravity of a particular system may have more to do with the position of the observer than with the system itself. My perception is certainly influenced from where I stand. If you stand opposite me, or separated by some degree then we may be traveling at different speeds along the curve of our understanding. This ought not to be too…

[Read more]

Devinder, it is disheartening to see that after reading Thea’s FACTS NOT THE FICTION OF DENIAl you can only write “I wud reply Madam Thea’s emotional posts later.” I find it insulting and dismissive. It means you have distorted the Power and Force behind her writing as ’emotional’, an adjective you have thrown out before. The beauty of the Knowl…[Read more]

Madam Thea,

Leaving aside your emotional outburst and referring pundits, nirayanis etc…, I would straightway come to the point.

By referring to numbers 2, 5,9 and 2 and then aligning to birth dates of Mother, Sri Aurobindo, yourself and one else, and then speaking vedic alignment in same breath, you are making big mistake. You must know that C…[Read more]

Dear Arinaya,

Let us start from reverse since you have agreed on point 4.

4) I wud reply Madam Thea’s emotional posts later.  But our agreement does not mean that it has to be the way you people are specifying as. It means we need to udnerstand right in logical/ academical manner and then realign.

3) Here also you have agreed that vedas don’t s…[Read more]

Arinaya, we always come to the same point: contemporary Indian astrologers and pundits have lost the knowledge of the meaning of the zodiacal signs. Therefore they have eliminated them and refer only to Nakshatras and to the astrological houses for interpretations; limiting them to a very superficial layer of the Art. This being the case,…[Read more]

Devinder,

As to your second point, in my study of the Veda, I have yet to find any mention of any constallations whatsoever, whether of lunar mansions or the modern IAU ones. As far as I can tell, constellations were not part of the symbolism used by the Vedic rishis. On the other hand, we find several references to a wheel of 360…[Read more]

Devinder,

In this reply I want to focus on your first point. Harish already addressed it, but to reiterate:

mrigo…bhimah kucaro (mriga: beast/animal, bhimah: terrible/formidable, kucara: roaming). Sri Aurobindo translated this as a “terrible lion that ranges…” Griffith translates it as “some wild beast, dread, prowling”. It’s interesting tha…[Read more]

FACTS NOT THE FICTION OF DENIAL
It is time to instruct Devinder and others about FACTS as per the Supramental Manifestation. When I present these FACTS, I request our friends to come up with answers, not what has been recently posted by Devinder when faced with the Capricorn Symbol-Map: to him this is ‘emotion’: I am caught up in a wave of emo…[Read more]

Dear Robert,

You can sort the issue of Hari Malla’s cosmology with Hari Malla. I don’t belong to it.

Instead of writing a lengthy post again and again with the contents similar in nature, why don’t you try these questions that I posed to Madam Thea:

1. Rigveda 1.154 does not have any Sanskrit word that can be translated as lion, bull or Friend.…[Read more]

Dear Hari Malla & Devinder,

One of the great mystics once said that there is a quality in the Soul called ‘Light’, a knowingness, which brings in more light than any intellect can give, indeed, all the light which the intellect can give is but a drop in the ocean beside this light. The perceptual power of this inner light is called ‘Se…[Read more]

This was posted on a new topic (The New Myth of the New Age), but I believe belongs here in this thread of discussion because Devinder makes reference to this comment above  [‘All I wrote in my last post is that you need to either do it independent of vedas or else understand the vedas and then realign it.’]

Dear Lori,

I find you people strange…

[Read more]

The gravity of a particular system may have more to do with the position of the observer than with the system itself. My perception is certainly influenced from where I stand. If you stand opposite me, or separated by some degree then we may be traveling at different speeds along the curve of our understanding. This ought not to be too difficult a…[Read more]

Madam Thea,

I can understand all your emotions that are natural when your heart and soul is into something. All I wrote in my last post is that you need to either do it independent of vedas or else understand the vedas and then realign it. There is no factual support in it, believe me.

In fact, if you realign, it lacks on the following fronts…[Read more]

I need to conclude what I started above, unfortunately without the graphics.

The point that needs to be made is that there is always only One Circle. That is the Constant, and it is the circle of 12 with their zodiacal signs and symbols. Why? Because that is where one finds VEDA – the Knowledge content. Otherwise it is a meaningless wheel that…[Read more]

There is an important part of this discussion that is being overlooked. It forms the heart and soul of my work; it is the basis of Myth across the world, and more particularly the Vedic Myth. It holds the key to the Dasavataras as indicated in the verses of the Rig Veda discussed above. Those very verses provide the exact key to the time of each…[Read more]

Dear Arinaya,

Your reply to Mr. Malla is biased with one observation i.e. tropical. You all seem knowing astronomy and texts, which is good but remain biased otherwise. When we say Sun revolution, that itself is geocentric world. And Sun revolution is tropical when it comes to equinoxes/ solstices but as standalone is not tropical, even in…[Read more]

The question has come up on this forum – What is Thea’s cosmolog?

A year ago, Thea wrote a series of articles, titled The Cosmological Perspective and in the first piece she says: “There is an underlying premise or backdrop for events transpiring on Earth, which, though ignored, is on the order of a cosmological constant that serves not only as…[Read more]

harimalla wrote:

Dear Mr.Arinaya, How do we know that there is precession.of the equinoxes? Is it not with reference to the star background.? Agreed that there is no  solstices and equinoxes in the sidereal zodiacs. Netherless is it not, on the background of fixed stars, that we see the motion of solstices and equinoxes of the year?  If not this ,…

[Read more]